The Role of Itraconazole in Recalcitrant Fungal Sinusitis

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Seiberling ◽  
Peter-John Wormald

Background Oral itraconazole is an antifungal that has been shown to be of benefit to patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillus (ABPA). It is hypothesized that itraconazole may similarly benefit patients with allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), a disease similar to ABPA. This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic response of itraconazole in patients with refractory chronic fungal sinusitis who have failed maximal medical and surgical therapy. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of 23 patients with AFS and nonallergic eosinophilic fungal sinusitis treated with oral itraconazole. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, comorbidities, allergies, fungal cultures, type of surgery performed, and amount of oral steroids used before and after itraconazole. All patients were given a 6-month dose of itraconazole (100 mg b.i.d.) when recurrence developed after surgery. Time to next recurrence, change in oral steroid use, and outcomes were noted. Liver function tests were taken at monthly intervals while on itraconazole. Results Twenty-three patients, 13 men and 10 women, were started on oral itraconazole for recurrent fungal sinusitis. Nineteen patients responded to the medication with a decrease in symptoms and fungal mucin/polyps on endoscopy. Three patients had to stop because of elevated liver enzymes. In the remaining 16 patients a decrease in oral steroid use was noted. In addition, 11 of the 16 patients are disease free to date at a mean follow-up of 15.7 months. No permanent complications occurred from the use of the medication. Conclusion Oral itraconazole may be of benefit to those patients with recalcitrant fungal sinusitis who have failed maximal medical and surgical therapy. Itraconazole may prolong the time to next recurrence and may enable the patient to significantly decrease or stop oral steroids.

Background: Ambiguity persists regarding the dosage, frequency, and duration for the use of oral steroids in Allergic Fungal Sinusitis (AFS). Objective: To assess the efficacy of post-operative oral steroid (prednisolone) for the control of disease in Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. Methodology: This was a comparative study, conducted at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur from January 2019 to March 2019. A total of 40 patients, aged 18 or above with weight over 50 kilograms, having proved Allergic Fungal Sinusitis (AFS) as per criteria defined by Deshazo and Swain, were recruited for this study. All the patients were enrolled within 14 days of excisive sinus surgery adopting endoscopic sinus surgery with or without open methods. Group A (n=20) received oral steroids while Group B (n=20) received a placebo. Patients of both groups also used fluticasone nasal spray and oral itraconazole. Evaluation of all the patients was done at the time of enrollment, 6 and 12 weeks. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21. Results: Out of a total of 40 patients, 17 (42.5%) were males. After 6 weeks of continuous therapy in both the study groups, 14 (70%) patients of Group A showed complete relief of symptoms in comparison to none in Group B (p-value = 0.001). After 12 weeks of therapy having tapering off in both study groups, all patients in Group A had complete relief of symptoms in comparison to only one (5%) in Group B (p-value = 0.001). Conclusion: Oral steroids of prednisolone, along with inhaled steroids therapy for a minimum of 12 weeks after excisive sinus surgery were found efficacious for the control of disease in patients with Allergic Fungal Sinusitis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Cellai

BACKGROUND We identified patients with coronavirus disease 2019 that were followed by a telemedicine clinic and eventually referred to a post COVID clinic due to persistent symptoms of COVID-19. Of those patients requiring referral to the post COVID clinic, equal percentages of patients treated acutely with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and/ or oral steroids required referral to a pulmonary specialist. OBJECTIVE To determine if there was a difference in long term outcomes when prescribed ICS versus oral steroids METHODS Chart review comparing new prescription ICS to new prescription oral steroid RESULTS No difference in long term outcome between the groups CONCLUSIONS It is safe to prescribe ICS or oral steroids for symptom relief, but cost may be an issue


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
R Schneider ◽  
R Verstegen ◽  
J Hulst ◽  
S Ito ◽  
V Ng

Abstract Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome occurs with 1 in every 1,000 to 10,000 drug exposures and has a mortality rate of up to 10%. It is one mechanism by which medications can induce liver injury with elevated liver enzymes seen in the majority of cases. In children, aromatic anticonvulsants are the drugs most commonly associated with DRESS syndrome. Valproate, a non-aromatic anti-epileptic, is not known to have a heightened risk of hypersensitivity syndromes and is often the anti-epileptic of choice in patients who develop hypersensitivity syndromes from other anti-epileptics. Valproate hepatotoxicity is normally caused by its inhibition of fatty acid transport and mitochondrial β-oxidation; vanishing bile duct syndrome is also reported. Aims We present a case, to the best of our knowledge the first in paediatrics, in which valproate causes DRESS syndrome and a secondary, predominantly cholestatic, liver injury. Methods Literature review and case report. Results A previously healthy 14-year-old girl was diagnosed with new-onset seizures and started on valproate. Three weeks later, she developed a pruritic exanthem. Despite discontinuing her valproate, the rash persisted and she developed fever and jaundice. She was admitted to the ICU at the Hospital for Sick Children with a diagnosis of DRESS syndrome (RegiSCAR DRESS score 7) for treatment with IV steroids. At admission, she had a skin eruption, fever, leukocytosis (22.86 x109/L), eosinophilia (1.03x109/L), atypical lymphocytes (1.62 x109/L), lymphadenopathy, and internal organ involvement (BiliC 138, GGT 501, INR 1.3, ALT 543, AST 370, Crt 109). Of note, her EBV PCR was positive. By discharge, her rash improved and kidney function normalized. Her cholestasis persisted, despite improvement in her transaminases and eosinophilia (BiliC 163, INR 1.0, GGT 338, ALT 506, AST 220, Eos 0.98x109/L). She was discharged home on an oral steroid wean, ursodeoxycholic acid, levocarnitine, and levetiracetam. Upon reaching a daily dose of 20mg of prednisone, her rash and pruritus worsened, she had lost 7kg, and she was readmitted for IV steroids. Her rash improved within 4 days and she was discharged on a slower steroid taper, with the addition of cholestyramine and insulin for steroid induced diabetes. At present (2 ½ months after diagnosis), she continues her oral steroids and has persistent liver injury and pruritus. Conclusions We report the first paediatric case of valproate induced DRESS syndrome causing a significant cholestatic presentation with otherwise preserved liver synthetic function. The prolonged cholestasis and pruritus may be a result of the natural course of DRESS syndrome, EBV reactivation/infection, or polypharmacy. Early recognition of DRESS syndrome as a mechanism of valproate induced liver injury in children is essential for earlier diagnosis and initiation of targeted therapy. Funding Agencies None


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3922-3922
Author(s):  
Maurille A. Feudjo-Tepie ◽  
Susan A. Hall ◽  
John W. Logie ◽  
Noah J. Robinson ◽  
Dimitri Bennett

Abstract ITP is a disease caused by inadequate platelet production as well as increased platelet destruction. Oral systemic steroids are recommended as first-line treatment. Prolonged use of oral steroids in other disease populations has been associated with an approximately two-fold increase in the risk of developing a cataract. This study aimed to quantify the underlying risk of cataracts among ITP patients compared with non-ITP patients. Using the GPRD, a retrospective matched cohort study was conducted in which each ITP patient newly diagnosed between 1992 and 2005 and age 18 years or older was matched to 5 non-ITP patients on gender, age, practice and duration of follow-up. ITP patients and cataract events were identified using specific Read/Oxmis disease codes and validated by a clinical epidemiologist. The exposure of interest was oral steroid use and the primary outcome was cataracts (recorded as cataracts or cataract surgery). Patients with a history of cataracts were not excluded from the study. Potential covariates of interest were diabetes, schizophrenia, glaucoma, splenectomy and hypertension. The risk of cataracts was quantified using incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, the difference between groups was estimated using a rate ratio and 95% CI. All analyses were further stratified by age and gender. Adjusted rate ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Seven hundred sixty ITP patients were identified, 745 (98%) of whom had 5 matched controls. The entire sample had a mean age of 56.4 years and 60.1% were female. Among ITP patients, users of oral steroids had a cataract incidence rate of 14.0 per 1000 person-years (PY) (95% CI: 8.7 – 21.4) and non steroid users 6.1 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 2.7 – 11.4). In the non-ITP population, these figures were 16.9 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 11.9 – 23.3) and 9.2 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 7.6 – 11.0), respectively. The incidence of cataracts was observed to increase with age. Adjusting for steroid use and other factors, the risk of cataracts was similar in the ITP and non-ITP populations (adjusted rate ratio 0.8, 95% CI: 0.5 – 1.2) whereas, oral steroid use was associated with an increased risk of cataracts in both ITP and non ITP populations (adjusted rate ratio 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2 – 2.2). There was no evidence of increased risk with either inhaled steroids, or intranasal steroids. As expected, our study shows that the use of oral steroids is associated with an increased risk of cataracts in both ITP and non-ITP populations. However, we found no evidence of a difference in the risk of cataracts between an ITP and a matched non-ITP population.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 629-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alen N. Cohen ◽  
Marilene B. Wang

Background Frontal sinus disease and its surgical management continues to remain an area of controversy among rhinologists. This is evidenced by the multitude of surgical procedures, both external and endoscopic, that have been developed in its management. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of frontal sinus minitrephination in combination with endoscopic frontal sinus exploration for the management of complex frontal sinus disease. Methods A retrospective chart review identified 13 patients treated with minitrephination, in conjunction with endoscopic frontal sinus exploration, at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center or West Los Angeles VA Medical Center from July 2004 to October 2005. Results Thirteen patients with diagnoses of chronic sinusitis (n = 10), nasal polyposis (n = 7), frontal mucocele (n = 4), allergic fungal sinusitis (n = 3), and inverting papilloma (n = 1) underwent either unilateral (n = 9) or bilateral (n = 4) minitrephination during primary or revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Median follow-up was 14.2 months. There were no complications attributed to the procedure, and all patients had improvement of their sinus symptoms and displayed no evidence of recurrence of their frontal sinus disease at last follow-up. Conclusion Minitrephination is a safe and effective adjunct in the management of complex frontal sinus disease, as it allows identification of the frontal recess and vigorous irrigation of the sinus contents.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (SEMAR) ◽  
pp. 85-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
SOHEILA NIKAKHLAGH ◽  
ALI KHODADADI ◽  
MALEK KANANI ◽  
LILA SISTANI KARAMPOUR ◽  
NADER SAKI

2016 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Bellmunt ◽  
Peter M. Vila ◽  
Jenny X. Chen ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld ◽  
Jesse M. Hackell ◽  
...  

Objectives Avoiding oral steroids for otitis media with effusion (OME) is endorsed as a performance measure by the National Quality Foundation, but data regarding current gaps and practice patterns are lacking. Our objectives were to evaluate oral steroid use for OME and the related diagnoses of eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and tympanic membrane retraction (TMR), to assess variations by visit setting, and to identify opportunities for measurable performance improvement. Study Design Cross-sectional analysis of a national database. Setting Ambulatory visits in the United States. Subjects Children and adults in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2005-2010). Methods Data were coded for patient demographic information, potential confounders (eg, concurrent conditions managed by oral steroids), and diagnosis of OME, ETD, or TMR (OME/ETD/TMR). The latter 2 diagnoses were included to meet minimum numbers for reliability of weighted estimates, but OME constituted the majority of cases. Multivariate regression was used to determine the variables associated with oral steroid use. Results Among 590,772 observations representing 7,191,711,480 visits for OME/ETD/TMR, 3.2% resulted in a new prescription for oral steroid medication (2.3% for children, 7.0% for adults). Adults were more likely to receive steroids (odds ratio = 3.50, P < .001) than those with other diagnoses, but a similar association was not found for children. Patients seen by an otolaryngologist or in the emergency department were less likely to receive steroids than those seen in other settings. Conclusions OME/ETD/TMR is infrequently treated with oral steroids, particularly in children. Opportunities for performance improvement are limited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document