Spray Structure in Near-Injector Region of Aerated Jet in Subsonic Crossflow

Author(s):  
Jaiho Lee ◽  
Khaled Sallam ◽  
Kuo-Cheng Lin ◽  
Campbell Carter
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lee ◽  
K. A. Sallam ◽  
K.-C. Lin ◽  
C. D. Carter

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1065-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Martin ◽  
M. Cardenas ◽  
Philipp Pischke ◽  
R. Kneer

Author(s):  
Liu Changjiang ◽  
Li Zhiming ◽  
Guo Runqiu ◽  
Feng Lansheng ◽  
YangShun Tao

Author(s):  
A. L. Kastengren ◽  
C. F. Powell ◽  
K.-S. Im ◽  
Y.-J. Wang ◽  
J. Wang

The near-nozzle structure of several nonevaporating biodiesel-blend sprays has been studied using X-ray radiography. Radiography allows quantitative measurements of the fuel distribution in sprays to be made with high temporal and spatial resolution. Measurements have been made at different values of injection pressure, ambient density, and with two different nozzle geometries to understand the influences of these parameters on the spray structure of the biodiesel blend. These measurements have been compared with corresponding measurements of Viscor, a diesel calibration fluid, to demonstrate the fuel effects on the spray structure. Generally, the biodiesel-blend spray has a similar structure to the spray of Viscor. For the nonhydroground nozzle used in this study, the biodiesel-blend spray has a slightly slower penetration into the ambient gas than the Viscor spray. The cone angle of the biodiesel-blend spray is generally smaller than that of the Viscor spray, indicating that the biodiesel-blend spray is denser than the Viscor spray. For the hydroground nozzle, both fuels produce sprays with initially wide cone angles that transition to narrow sprays during the steady-state portion of the injection event. These variations in cone angle with time occur later for the biodiesel-blend spray than for the Viscor spray, indicating that the dynamics of the injector needle as it opens are somewhat different for the two fuels.


Author(s):  
Qinglin Xu ◽  
Shangze Yang ◽  
Di Xiao ◽  
Xuesong Li ◽  
Min Xu

Author(s):  
Shaji S. Manipurath

The development of higher thermal stability fuels and the development of onboard fuel deoxygenation systems may permit the preheating of fuel up to about 755 K before the onset of pyrolysis. At a sufficiently high fuel temperature for a given combustion chamber pressure, the flash vaporization of liquid or supercritical state fuel can ensue upon injection into the chamber. The performance of standard aviation turbine engine fuel nozzles, designed for mechanically breaking up liquid sprays, may thus be significantly altered by the employment of severely preheated fuel. An evaluation of heated and superheated Jet A-1 sprays from a pressure-swirl atomizer was implemented in a purpose-built test facility. Laser sheet imaging of the spray yielded simultaneous axial cross-sectional maps of Mie-scatter and fluorescence signals. In addition, particle image velocimetry was also used to measure the spray droplet velocity-field. The results indicated that increasing the fuel’s dimensionless level of superheat ΔT* from −1.8 to 0.6 yielded significant changes in the spray structure; specifically, finer droplet sizes, a more uniform dropsize distribution across the spray, increased spray cone angle till about ΔT* = −0.8 followed by a contraction thereafter, marginally increased spray penetration, and significantly higher localised near nozzle tip droplet velocities. The measurements supported the hypothesis that the initial hollow-cone spray structure evolves to a near solid-cone structure with a central vapour core as the fuel is superheated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document