Methods for Distributed Testing in Joint Environments: Results from INTEGRAL FIRE 2007

Author(s):  
Eileen Bjorkman ◽  
Frank Gray
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Hierons
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Kähkönen ◽  
Olli Saarikivi ◽  
Keijo Heljanko

1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Zimmer ◽  
Dennis J. Hocevar

The effects of massed versus distributed practice on achievement and test anxiety were investigated using a quasi-experimental design employing 56 college students under two conditions. Test anxiety was assessed using Sarason's four-dimensional Reactions to Tests, while classroom achievement was measured on tests using multiple-choice applications. Experimental subjects were given four Reactions to Tests items and 10-item examinations on a weekly basis for 10 weeks, while control subjects had only a 100-item final examination. Analysis indicated (1) significantly higher final examination performance for the distributed testing condition; (2) a significant reduction in test anxiety between initial sessions and the remainder of the term in the distributed testing condition; (3) no difference in test anxiety between the distributed testing and control conditions when test anxiety was assessed at the end of the term; and (4) nonsignificant correlations between test anxiety dimensions of the Reactions to Tests and achievement in both the control and distributed testing conditions. Results support the contention that relationships between achievement and test anxiety may be more complex than previously thought.


Author(s):  
Robert M. Hierons ◽  
Mercedes G. Merayo ◽  
Manuel Núñez
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Salma Azzouzi ◽  
Sara Hsaini ◽  
My El Hassan Charaf

Conformance testing may be seen as mean to execute an IUT (implementation under test) by carrying out test cases in order to observe whether the behavior of the IUT is conforming to its specifications. However, the development of distributed testing frameworks is more complex and the implementation of the parallel testing components (PTCs) should take into consideration the mechanisms and functions required to support interaction during PTC communication. In this article, the authors present another way to control the test execution of PTCs by introducing synchronization messages into the local test sequences. Then, they suggest an agent-based simulation to implement synchronized local test sequences and resolve the problem of control and synchronization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1352-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Battey ◽  
Jianqing Fan ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
Junwei Lu ◽  
Ziwei Zhu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document