scholarly journals Intelektuālā īpašuma aizsardzības loma valstu ekonomikas izaugsmē

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (19) ◽  
pp. 139-151
Author(s):  
Liene Vindele
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Innovative Products ◽  
Effective Use

Ņemot vērā intelektuālā īpašuma politikas attīstību, uzņēmumi arvien biežāk izstrādā intelektuālā īpašuma stratēģijas, lai varētu iegūt arvien lielāku labumu no to izstrādātajiem inovatīvajiem produktiem. Ir pierādīts, ka uzņēmumi, kuri savā darbībā izmanto intelektuālo īpašumu, ir ekonomiski konkurētspējīgāki, un tas paaugstina arī valsts konkurētspēju. Mūsdienās inovācijām un to efektīvai izmantošanai uzņēmuma attīstībā ir izšķiroša nozīme ne tikai paša uzņēmuma, bet arī valsts konkurētspējai. Tādēļ politikas veidotāji, lai veicinātu inovāciju un ekonomisko izaugsmi, cenšas pilnveidot intelektuālā īpašuma regulējumu. Lai arī jau gadsimtiem ilgi tiek atzīts, ka intelektuālā īpašuma tiesību aizsardzība ir svarīga ekonomiskajai attīstībai un inovācijām, tomēr pārkāpumu un viltojumu skaits katru gadu turpina palielināties, radot miljoniem eiro lielus zaudējumus. Today, innovations and their effective use in the development of the company are crucial not only for the competitiveness of the company itself, but also for the competitiveness of the country. Recent research shows that, as intellectual property policies evolve, companies are increasingly developing intellectual property strategies in order to benefit more and more from the innovative products they develop. In addition, these companies, which use intellectual property in their operations, are more economically competitive, which also increases the country’s competitiveness. That way, policy makers seek to improve the regulation of intellectual property in order to foster innovation and economic growth. However, although the protection of intellectual property rights has been recognised for centuries as important for economic development and innovation, the number of infringements and counterfeits continues to rise every year, causing millions of losses.

Protection and Promotion of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) for Economic Competitiveness and Growth

2022 ◽  
pp. 147-156
Author(s):  
Puneet Kumar ◽  
Abdul Sattar A. Al-Ausi
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Technology Intelligence ◽  
Economic Competitiveness ◽  
The World

The intellectual property they possess of an innovative technological invention that they have created is the only thing that matters to certain small businesses. IPR has genuinely grown as an “intellectual currency,” aiding in the advancement of global economic development, corporate prosperity, and creativity. In many fields of technology, intelligence, and culture, governments around the world are searching for ways to develop their economies, assist their people, and create national capabilities. This chapter discusses and describes the importance of intellectual property (IP) rights in achieving these vital objectives. This chapter will also offer an empirical summary of how a successful intellectual property rights regime can support or impede economic growth (IPRS).

PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF BUSINESSACTIVITIESIN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4(73)) ◽  
pp. 44-47
Author(s):  
A.A. Potravnov
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Property Market ◽  
Innovative Products ◽  
Effective Use

The article refers to the effective use of intellectual property rights for the development of the national economy. What characteristics characterize the market of intellectual products or innovative products and what features distinguish the market of intellectual property from the market of conventional goods. Legal regulation of intellectual property in national and international legislation.

scholarly journals Effects of patents on the transition from stagnation to growth

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angus C. Chu ◽  
Zonglai Kou ◽  
Xilin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Growth Model ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Theoretic Analysis ◽  
Schumpeterian Growth ◽  
Long Run

Abstract This study provides a growth-theoretic analysis of the effects of intellectual property rights on the take-off of an economy from an era of stagnation to a state of sustained economic growth. We incorporate patent protection into a Schumpeterian growth model in which take-off occurs when the population size crosses an endogenous threshold. We find that strengthening patent protection has contrasting effects on economic growth at different stages of development. Specifically, it leads to an earlier take-off but also reduces economic growth in the long run.

Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): The Case of Latin American & Caribbean Developing Economies

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Mumtaz Hussain Shah
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Market Size ◽  
Annual Data ◽  
Macroeconomic Stability

The growing share of knowledge-intensive products in international trade and the increasing sensitivity of multinational firms to intellectual property theft make it imperative to analyse the effect of IPR promulgation on their FDI decision. In this perspective the current article gauge the importance of Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement under World Trade Organisation (WTO) in increasing a Latin American & Caribbean (LAC) developing economy’s appeal for investors from abroad. Infrastructure and skilled labour availability, market size, macroeconomic stability, economic development, and trade liberalization are also considered. Time-invariant phenomena such as access to the sea, regional affiliations/proximities, income groupings and ability to speak one of the international languages, though desirable were not done because fixed effect panel estimation technique does not permit the use of dummy variables. Due to the 2008-2009 recession in the developed economies, the available investment funds withered, making the investors’ sceptic apropos the safety of their tangible and intangible property, especially in the developing world, causing a decrease in FDI to these nations in general. However, LAC countries were somewhat resilient and received a steadily increasing flow of foreign investment. Thus, it demands to analyse the factors that overcame the overseas investors’ scepticism and prompted them to invest in the LAC region. By utilizing annual data for 28 years that is 1989-2016 from 24 LAC developing nations it is found that infrastructure and human capital availability, macroeconomic stability, economic development, strengthening and worldwide harmonization of intellectual property right standards through TRIPS positively effects the overseas investor's investment decision. The host population used to measure market size is found to be insignificant when tested with other conventional FDI location pull factors. Similarly, liberalization, consistent with horizontal FDI theory, exerts a significant negative effect on inward FDI.

Do intellectual property rights involve a private power to tax

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-224
Author(s):  
Carla Marchese
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Mainstream Economic ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Monopoly Profit ◽  
Private Power ◽  
Bundle Of Rights

This article criticises the standard approach to intellectual property rights, interpreted as property rights conferring a monopolistic position, by showing that a public good is not a suitable basis for a private monopoly and that the bundle of rights included in an intellectual property right is so different from those enjoyed under a standard monopoly as to suggest that a different mechanism is at work, that is, a private power to tax has been granted. To highlight how this novel approach works, mainstream economic models of economic growth based on research and development, whether protected or not by intellectual property rights, are revisited. The theory of taxation is then recalled to show that taxes involved by intellectual property rights can range from an amount equal to the monopoly profit to Lindahl taxes. Finally, the principles of taxation elaborated by economic theory are examined for clues to improving the design of intellectual property rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document