scholarly journals Lingual split bone technique – Revisited as a standard operating procedure for surgical removal of third molar during COVID pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Sushmitha Mohan ◽  
Annamalai Thangavelu ◽  
Aravindraj
Keyword(s):  
Operating Procedure ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Standard Operating ◽  
Infectivity Rate ◽  
Alveolar Osteitis ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Objectives: The objective of the study is to revisit the forgotten art of Lingual split bone technique during the COVID pandemic as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. It was originally introduced in early 90’s by Sir William Kelsey Fry and also we have compared its advantages over the bone guttering technique. Materials and Methods: Twenty seven cases were operated during COVID pandemic in our institution using Davi’s modified lingual split technique under strict COVID protocol. Results: All impacted mandibular third molars were successfully removed. With regards to post-operative complication; 3 patients had nerve injury (11%), 2 patients had lingual paraesthesia (7.6%), 1 patient had alveolar osteitis (3.8%), 2 patients had postoperative infection (7.6%), 3 patients had trismus (19%). The overall success rate was 100%. Also the results of a comparison between bone guttering and chisel-mallet technique were stated. Conclusion: The use of lingual split bone technique deserves consideration during this COVID time as an alternate for bone guttering in surgical removal of third molar as it ensures minimal cross infectivity rate among both dentists and patients. Thus, patient care can be delivered with confidence even during pandemic.

scholarly journals Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani Arakji ◽  
Mohamed Shokry ◽  
Nayer Aboelsaad
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Bone Quantity

The purpose of this study was to test the effect of the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars using piezosurgery versus the conventional surgical technique on postoperative sequelae and bone healing.Material and Methods.This study was carried out as a randomized controlled clinical trial: split mouth design. Twenty patients with bilateral mandibular third molar mesioangular impaction class II position B indicated for surgical extraction were treated randomly using either the piezosurgery or the conventional bur technique on each site. Duration of the procedure, postoperative edema, trismus, pain, healing, and bone density and quantity were evaluated up to 6 months postoperatively.Results.Test and control sites were compared using pairedt-test. There was statistical significance in reduction of pain and swelling in test sites, where the time of the procedure was statistically increased in test site. For bone quantity and quality, statistical difference was found where test site showed better results.Conclusion.Piezosurgery technique improves quality of patient’s life in form of decrease of postoperative pain, trismus, and swelling. Furthermore, it enhances bone quality within the extraction socket and bone quantity along the distal aspect of the mandibular second molar.

scholarly journals TO COMPARE THE EFFECT OF PRE-EMPTIVE DEXAMETHASONE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE EITHER BY INTRAMUSCULAR OR BY SUBMUCOSAL ROUTE FOR THE POSTOPERATIVE CONTROL OF PAIN, SWELLING, AND LIMITED MOUTH OPENING FOLLOWING THE EXTRACTION OF IMPACTED THIRD MOLARS

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kiran Shubha ◽  
Ravi Narula ◽  
Navneet Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Intramuscular Injection ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Limited Mouth Opening ◽  
Submucosal Injection ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Better Than

Introduction: The surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars is an invasive procedure that involves extensive tissue trauma and a considerable postoperative inflammatory response. Although the inflammatory process is necessary for healing when exacerbated it may cause pain, swelling and limited mouth opening. Corticosteroids are among the most widely employed pre-operative medication administered for the control of such complications. Objective: To compare the effects of single dose of pre-operative Injection Dexamethasone versus Injection Methylprednisolone via Intramuscular or Submucosal route for controlling the post-operative pain, swelling and limited mouth opening in the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Material and Method:. The present study was conducted on 40 healthy adult patients with bilaterally symmetrical impacted mandibular third molar, reporting to the Department of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research Institute, Sunam. Clinically, pain, swelling, mouth-opening were evaluated pre-operatively as baseline and post-operatively on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days. Results: The results of our study are summarized below: In Group A: Submucosal injection of dexamethasone gave better results in controlling pain, swelling and trismus in comparison to Intramuscular injection of dexamethasone. In Group B: Submucosal injection of methylprednisolone showed better results in terms of pain, swelling and trismus when compared with Intramuscular injection of methylprednisolone. In Group C: Intramuscular injection of dexamethasone gave better results in terms of pain and mouth opening but, swelling was reduced with Intramuscular methylprednisolone. In Group D: Submucosal injection of dexamethasone showed better results in terms of pain, but swelling and mouth opening was reduced when methylprednisolone was used submucosal. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that Dexamethasone is better than Methylprednisolone in controlling post-operative sequelae after third molar surgery. This can attributed to the higher potency and longer half-life and less sodium retaining capacity of dexamethasone than methylprednisolone. The results of our study also concluded that submucosal route of administration of drug is better than Intramuscular route because of the repository effect of the submucosal route, also this route is beneficial to the patient as well to the surgeon because needle penetration is done in the pre-anesthetized area, also it is an easy technique to be mastered by the surgeon.

scholarly journals The Growth Factors in Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) Reduce Postoperative Complications after Mandibular Third Molar Odontectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (24) ◽  
pp. 13343
Author(s):  
Anna Starzyńska ◽  
Magdalena Kaczoruk-Wieremczuk ◽  
Michele Antonio Lopez ◽  
Pier Carmine Passarelli ◽  
Paulina Adamska
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars constitutes one of the most frequently performed procedures within oral surgery. This surgery procedure is associated with many post-operative complications. Advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) belongs to the second generation of platelet concentrates and is rich in numerous growth factors. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of A-PRF on selected clinical features following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. The research was conducted on 100 generally healthy patients, who underwent a lower third molar odontectomy in Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland, between 2018 and 2019. The research group consisted of 50 patients (immediate A-PRF socket filling) and control group (50 patients without A-PRF socket filling). During the study, the following clinical features were assessed: pain (visual analog scale), analgesics intake, the presence of trismus, edema, hematomas within the surrounding tissues (e.g., cheek), prevalence of pyrexia, dry socket, secondary bleeding, presence of hematomas, skin warmth in the post-operative area, and bleeding time observed by the patient were analyzed on the 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the procedure. There was a significant association between A-PRF socket filling and pain intensity, the analgesics intake, trismus, and edema on the 3rd and the 7th day (p < 0.05). The presence of hematomas and skin warmth on the 3rd day after the surgery (p < 0.05) were also statistically associated with A-PRF use. The study showed that in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, A-PRF was more important than the position of the tooth or the duration of the procedure. The growth factors in A-PRF reduce postoperative complications, such as pain, trismus, edema, analgesics intake, presence of hematomas, and skin warmth, after mandibular wisdom teeth odontectomy.

scholarly journals Wisdom Tooth—Complications in Extraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishi Singh ◽  
Amiya Agrawal ◽  
Arvind Yadav ◽  
Siddhartha Chandel ◽  
Ankita Singhal
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Lingual Nerve ◽  
Root Tip ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Wisdom Tooth ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Alveolar Osteitis ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence of complications in a group of 171 patients in whom extractions of impacted mandibular third molar have been performed by two oral surgeons between the period April 2010 and March 2012. This retrospective study comprises evaluation of 270 impacted mandibular third molars which were classified into two groups A and B on the basis of procedure of osteotomy only and osteotomy and odontotomy both respectively. Total no of complications reported were 40 (14.81%). Maximum no of cases reported alveolar osteitis (AO) (11.11%) while other complications reported root tip fractures (2.22%), lingual nerve parasthesia and TMJ problems (each 0.74%) in descending frequency. Conclusion drawn is that the risk of complications in extractions of impacted mandibular third molars always exists, and extractions associated with both osteotomy and odontotomy are associated with higher risk of complications. How to cite this article Agrawal A, Yadav A, Chandel S, Singh N, Singhal A. Wisdom Tooth—Complications in Extraction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(1):34-36.

scholarly journals Assessment of Lingual Nerve Paresthesia after Removal of Mandibular Third Molar

2021 ◽  
pp. 253-259
Author(s):  
V. Usha ◽  
G. Rajabackiyam ◽  
K. Prabhu Sankar ◽  
Varun Muthuraman ◽  
Aravind Christo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Resorption ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Lingual Nerve ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
The Common ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars are the most commonly performed minor surgical procedures by maxillofacial surgeon. If not treated can lead to few complications like pericoronitis, root resorption of second molar, caries of second molar, cyst and tumours can arise from them. The common complications include swelling, hematoma, trismus and lingual nerve injuries. In this article 1000 cases of various types impactions were surgically operated and assessment of lingual nerve injury was done.

scholarly journals Retrospective analysis of malpositioned mandibular third molars in elderly patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Charles E. Anyanechi ◽  
Birch D Saheeb
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Hospital Records ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Osteitis ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
The Common ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Objective: To determine the frequency of symptomatic malpositioned mandibular third molars in elderly patients. Method: An analytic study of hospital records of elderly patients with symptomatic impacted mandibular third molars over 17 years was undertaken. Information on demographics, types of impaction, reasons for surgical extraction, and complications after treatment were obtained. Those who were asymptomatic would be excluded from analysis. Results: Altogether, 6214 impacted mandibular third molars were isolated in 5, 431 patients. However, 436 (7.0%) symptomatic impacted teeth were recorded in 436 (8.0%) patients and these were extracted, while the rest, 5778 (93.0%) were asymptomatic. Males were greater than females in the ratio of 1.1:1. The frequency of occurrence of mesio-angular and vertical impactions were significant (P= 0.001) compared with disto-angular and horizontal. Periodontal disease was 211 (48.4%) of the case in addition to dental caries and its clinical sequelae 203 (46.6%) were significant reasons for extractions (P=0.000). The common postoperative complications were alveolar osteitis and hypersensitivity of the adjacent molar 22(68.7%) which related to surgical extraction of disto-angular impactions (P= 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed the older the patient the less likely malpositioned mandibular third molar suggesting that majority of such impactions do not cause pathology after many years of their presence in the oral cavity. Prophylactic extraction of malpositioned mandibular third molars in all patients should be discouraged, but each case should be treated on merit or when symptomatic.

scholarly journals Incidence of impacted mandibular third molars in population of Bosnia and Herzegovina: a retrospective radiographic study

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadeta Šečić ◽  
Samir Prohić ◽  
Sanja Komšić ◽  
Amra Vuković
Keyword(s):  
Bosnia And Herzegovina ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Dentigerous Cysts ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Introduction: Impaction may be defined as the failure of complete eruption into a normal functional position of one tooth within normal time due to lack of space in the dental arch, caused by obstruction byanother tooth or development in an abnormal position. The mandibular third molar is the most frequently impacted tooth. The incidence varies from 9.5% to 68% in different populations.Methods: The study was conducted in Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University in Sarajevo. Study represents retrospective analysis of panoramic radiographs (orthopantomograms) of patientsreferred to Department of Oral Surgery from January 2010 to February 2013 with indication for surgical removal of impacted third molars.Results: Of the 2000 radiographs, 761 presented with at least one impacted third molar (38%). A total of 1034 impacted mandibular third molars were present (51.7%). The most common age group was thirddecade (61.2%). Signifi cant statistical difference in incidence of third molar impaction was found between females and males (p<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in incidence in urban and suburbanpopulation (p=0.374). Vertical angulation was the most common pattern of impaction (65%). Frequency of third molars erupted into their normal position (class IA) was 42%. Impacted mandibular molars wereassociated with periodontal pockets in 134 (6.5%) cases and with dentigerous cysts in 5 cases (0.2%).Conclusion: The present study provides useful data regarding the clinical status of third molars in population of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document