scholarly journals Single-stage Anterior-posterior Decompression and Stabilization with Instrumentation for Cervical Spine Disorders

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-304
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Inui ◽  
Hiroshi Hasegawa ◽  
Masahiro Murakami ◽  
Kou Matsuda ◽  
Hiroki Yoneda ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl D. Schultz ◽  
Mark R. McLaughlin ◽  
Regis W. Haid ◽  
Christopher H. Comey ◽  
Gerald E. Rodts ◽  
...  

Object. To evaluate the applicability and safety of single-stage combined anterior—posterior decompression and fusion for complex cervical spine disorders, the authors retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive procedures of this type performed using a uniform technique at a single center. Methods. The indications for decompression and stabilization included: postlaminectomy kyphosis (15 patients), trauma (19 patients), spondylosis and congenital stenosis (32 patients), and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (six patients). All patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomies in which allograft fibula and plates were placed, with 89% of patients undergoing two- or three-level procedures (range one–four levels). Lateral mass plating with autograft (morselized iliac crest) fusion was performed in all patients while the same anesthetic agent was still in effect. A hard cervical collar was used postoperatively in all patients (mean 13 weeks). All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean 29 months). Fusion was determined to be successful in all 72 patients (100%). Although the short-term morbidity rate reached 32%, the significant long-term morbidity rate was only 5%. At the 2-year follow-up examination, anterior cervical plate dislodgment was seen in one patient, and 16 of the 516 lateral mass screws implanted were observed to have partially backed out. However, there were no cases of nerve root injury, strut graft extrusion, or anterior plate or screw fracture. There were no clinically significant hardware complications and no patient required repeated operation. Conclusions. The combined single-stage anterior—posterior decompression, reconstruction, and instrumentation procedure represents a viable option in the treatment of a select group of patients with complex cervical spinal disorders. The technique provides immediate rigid stabilization of the cervical spine, prevents anterior plate failure or strut graft extrusion, and eliminates the need for halo immobilization postoperatively. Furthermore, a higher rate of fusion is achieved with this combined approach than with the anterior approach alone.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl D. Schultz ◽  
Mark R. Mclaughlin ◽  
Regis W. Haid ◽  
Christopher H. Comey ◽  
Gerald E. Rodts ◽  
...  

Object To evaluate the applicability and safety of single-stage combined anterior–posterior decompression and fusion for complex cervical spine disorders, the authors retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive procedures of this type performed at their respective institutions. Methods The indications for decompression and stabilization included: postlaminectomy kyphosis (15 patients), trauma (19 patients), spondylosis and congenital stenosis (32 patients), and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (six patients). All patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomies in which allograft fibula and plates were placed, with 89% of patients undergoing two- or three-level procedures (range one–four levels). Lateral mass plating with autograft (morselized iliac crest) fusion was performed in all patients while the same anesthetic agent was still in effect. A hard cervical collar was used postoperatively in all patients (mean 13 weeks). All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean 29 months). Fusion was determined to be successful in all 72 patients (100%). Although the short-term morbidity rate reached 32%, the significant long-term morbidity rate was only 5%. At the 2-year follow-up examination, anterior cervical plate dislodgment was seen in one patient, and 16 of the 516 lateral mass screws implanted were observed to have partially backed out. However, there were no cases of nerve root injury, strut graft extrusion, or anterior plate or screw fracture. There were no clinically significant hardware complications and no patient required repeated operation. Conclusions The combined single-stage anterior–posterior decompression, reconstruction, and instrumentation procedure represents a viable option in the treatment of a select group of patients with complex cervical spinal disorders. The technique provides immediate rigid stabilization of the cervical spine, prevents anterior plate failure or strut graft extrusion, and eliminates the need for halo immobilization postoperatively. Furthermore, a higher rate of fusion is achieved with this combined approach than with the anterior approach alone.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-704
Author(s):  
Karl Schultz ◽  
Regis W. Haid ◽  
Christopher Comey ◽  
Gerald Rodts ◽  
Scott Erwood ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 912-916
Author(s):  
Yasushi Asakawa ◽  
Kunio Sasaki ◽  
Keiichirou Shiba ◽  
Takayoshi Ueta ◽  
Motofumi Komori ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 729-746
Author(s):  
James Rainville ◽  
Jerry B. Sobel ◽  
Robert J. Banco ◽  
Harvey L. Levine ◽  
Lisa Childs

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Justin K. Scheer ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
Virginie Lafage ◽  
...  

Object Cervical spine osteotomies are powerful techniques to correct rigid cervical spine deformity. Many variations exist, however, and there is no current standardized system with which to describe and classify cervical osteotomies. This complicates the ability to compare outcomes across procedures and studies. The authors' objective was to establish a universal nomenclature for cervical spine osteotomies to provide a common language among spine surgeons. Methods A proposed nomenclature with 7 anatomical grades of increasing extent of bone/soft tissue resection and destabilization was designed. The highest grade of resection is termed the major osteotomy, and an approach modifier is used to denote the surgical approach(es), including anterior (A), posterior (P), anterior-posterior (AP), posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior-anterior (APA), and posterior-anterior-posterior (PAP). For cases in which multiple grades of osteotomies were performed, the highest grade is termed the major osteotomy, and lower-grade osteotomies are termed minor osteotomies. The nomenclature was evaluated by 11 reviewers through 25 different radiographic clinical cases. The review was performed twice, separated by a minimum 1-week interval. Reliability was assessed using Fleiss kappa coefficients. Results The average intrarater reliability was classified as “almost perfect agreement” for the major osteotomy (0.89 [range 0.60–1.00]) and approach modifier (0.99 [0.95–1.00]); it was classified as “moderate agreement” for the minor osteotomy (0.73 [range 0.41–1.00]). The average interrater reliability for the 2 readings was the following: major osteotomy, 0.87 (“almost perfect agreement”); approach modifier, 0.99 (“almost perfect agreement”); and minor osteotomy, 0.55 (“moderate agreement”). Analysis of only major osteotomy plus approach modifier yielded a classification that was “almost perfect” with an average intrarater reliability of 0.90 (0.63–1.00) and an interrater reliability of 0.88 and 0.86 for the two reviews. Conclusions The proposed cervical spine osteotomy nomenclature provides the surgeon with a simple, standard description of the various cervical osteotomies. The reliability analysis demonstrated that this system is consistent and directly applicable. Future work will evaluate the relationship between this system and health-related quality of life metrics.


Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wright ◽  
Tom G. Mayer ◽  
Robert J. Gatchel

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Otsudo ◽  
Kiyokazu Akasaka ◽  
Hiroshi Hattori ◽  
Yuki Hasebe ◽  
Akihiro Tamura ◽  
...  

Objective. The study used a 3D digitizer to determine three-dimensional motion analysis of the 2nd cervical (C2) spinous process at end range cervical rotation with the scapula in different positions. Methods. 30 healthy adults participated in this study. Different scapula positions were adopted bilaterally and positioned passively at normal resting, depression, adduction, and abduction. Under each scapula position, bilateral end range cervical rotation and displacement of the C2 spinous process were analyzed by a 3D digitizer. Results. Displacement of the C2 spinous process relative to the occiput was significantly correlated with range of cervical rotation under all scapular positions (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between end range cervical rotation and displacement of the C2 spinous process relative to the occiput in any scapular position. Conclusion. These results suggest that measurement of upper cervical mobility using the 3D digitizer is a reliable method that holds promise in the evaluation of people with cervical spine disorders.


Neurospine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 630-639
Author(s):  
Ricardo B.V Fontes ◽  
Mena G. Kerolus ◽  
Ryan B. Kochanski ◽  
Rajeev K. Garg ◽  
Anthony DelaCruz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document