scholarly journals RAPID study: low dose spinal versus hemi-spinal anaesthesia in fast-track surgery in patients receiving a primary total knee arthroplasty. Preliminary results of a prospective randomised controlled study

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita ten Hagen
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Fast Track Surgery ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Primary Total Knee

A Randomized Controlled Study on the Use of Tourniquet in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaofan Zhang ◽  
Chun Hoi Yan ◽  
Ping Keung Chan ◽  
Henry Fu ◽  
Kwong Yuen Chiu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Primary Total Knee

Abstract Background The use and the optimal timing of tourniquet during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Most previous studies failed to show clinically significant differences in different strategies. The aim of this study was to determine how three strategies of tourniquet application affect the outcome in TKA patients. Methods This was a prospective randomized controlled study. Patients who undergo TKA were randomized into one of the three groups (1:1:1 ratio): tourniquet inflated from skin incision to cement hardening, tourniquet from cement application to hardening, and tourniquet from skin incision to skin closure. The perioperative blood loss, limb swelling, and complications were recorded. The level of hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, creatine kinase (CK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined. Patients' thigh and TKA wound pain, Knee Society knee score (KSKS) and Knee Society functional assessment (KSFA) scores, and rehabilitation parameters were evaluated. Results A total of 90 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were comparable. We only found significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss (skin to cement: 58.7 ± 36.1 mL, cement-only: 147.8 ± 107.9 mL, skin to skin: 16.3 ± 13.1 mL, p < 0.0001). There were no statistical differences in postoperative drainage, thigh/knee circumference, change of hemoglobin/hematocrit, CRP, IL-6, CK, and LDH on day 1 to day 4 after surgery. The thigh/TKA wound Visual Analogue Scale scores, KSKS score, KSFA score, and rehabilitation parameters were not significantly different at up to 6-month follow-up. No thromboembolic events were noted. Conclusion Our results revealed that there was no best tourniquet strategy in TKA. Different tourniquet methods can be utilized based on surgeon preference without affecting outcomes.

No difference between standard and high flexion cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1591-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Robert Springorum ◽  
Günther Maderbacher ◽  
Benjamin Craiovan ◽  
Christian Lüring ◽  
Clemens Baier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cruciate Retaining ◽  
High Flexion ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Register-based Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial (ALBA trial)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e041096
Author(s):  
Tesfaye H Leta ◽  
Jan-Erik Gjertsen ◽  
Håvard Dale ◽  
Geir Hallan ◽  
Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Primary Total Knee

IntroductionThe current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the USA where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. Therefore, we designed a double-blinded pragmatic multicentre register-based randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared with plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods and analysisA minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomised into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be: risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1, 6, 10 and 20 years of follow-up; patient-related outcome measures like function, pain, satisfaction and health-related quality of life at 1, 6 and 10 years of follow-up; risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1, 6, 10 and 20 years of follow-up; cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC versus plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomisation with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomise patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomisation and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) on 21 June 2019. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberNCT04135170.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document