Objective Quantification of Psychomotor Dynamics During Pharmacological Treatment of Bipolar Depression

Author(s):  
Petya Terziivanova
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Dmitrzak-Weglarz ◽  
Aleksandra Szczepankiewicz ◽  
Janusz Rybakowski ◽  
Paweł Kapelski ◽  
Karolina Bilska ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to find the expression biomarkers of pharmacological treatment response in a naturalistic hospital setting. Through gene expression profiling, we were able to find differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) in unipolar (UD) and bipolar (BD) depressed women. Methods We performed gene expression profiling in hospitalized women with unipolar (n=24) and bipolar depression (n=32) who achieved clinical improvement after pharmacological treatment (without any restriction). To identify DEGs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), we used the SurePrint G3 Microarray and GeneSpring software. Results After pharmacological treatment, UD and BD varied in the number of regulated genes and ontological pathways. Also, the pathways of neurogenesis and synaptic transmission were significantly up-regulated. Our research focused on DEGs with a minimum fold change (FC) of more than 2. For both types of depression, 2 up-regulated genes, OPRM1 and CELF4 (p=0.013), were significantly associated with treatment response (defined as a 50% reduction on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]). We also uncovered the SHANK3 (p=0.001) gene that is unique for UD and found that the RASGRF1 (p=0.010) gene may be a potential specific biomarker of treatment response for BD. Conclusion Based on transcriptomic profiling, we identified potential expression biomarkers of treatment outcomes for UD and BD. We also proved that the Ras-GEF pathway associated with long-term memory, female stress response, and treatment response modulation in animal studies impacts treatment efficacy in patients with BD. Further studies focused on the outlined genes may help provide predictive markers of treatment outcomes in UD and BD.


2015 ◽  
pp. 281-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keming Gao ◽  
Renrong Wu ◽  
Heinz Grunze ◽  
Joseph R. Calabrese

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S333
Author(s):  
A. Permoda-Osip ◽  
J. Dorszewska ◽  
M. Chlopocka-Wozniak ◽  
J.K. Rybakowski

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S212-S213 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Terziivanova ◽  
S. Haralanov ◽  
E. Haralanova ◽  
G. Dzhupanov

IntroductionPsychomotor disturbances are among the core symptoms of endogenous depression. They reflect the underlying pathophysiology of the depressive episode and are sensitive to the neurobiological effects of its pharmacological treatment. Being objectively manifested, the psychomotor functions and dysfunctions are technically recordable and measurable by the available motion analysis systems.AimsTo objectively record and measure the psychomotor dysfunctions in bipolar depression and their dynamics during pharmacological treatment.MethodsWe introduced an original (internationally patented) equilibriometric method for objective and quantitative recording of psychomotor dysfunctions during stepping locomotion in 37 hospitalized patients with bipolar depression and 30 well-matched healthy controls. Two separable psychomotor functions were analyzed in parallel: conscious (voluntary) activity and subconscious (automatic) reactivity. Both patients and controls were examined twice in order to quantify their psychomotor dynamics. Patients were examined at the first day of their hospitalisation and the day before their discharge. The two consecutive examinations of the controls were with equivalent time intervals.ResultsThere was no significant psychomotor dynamics (P > 0.05) in the healthy controls between their first and second equilibriometric recording. Psychomotor activity and/or reactivity of the patients were relatively slower at their first recording and significantly accelerated (P < 0.05) at their second recording after effective pharmacological treatment.ConclusionsObjective recording and quantitative assessment of psychomotor dynamics in patients with bipolar depression during the pharmacological treatment of their current episode could be a sensitive measure of their improvement and might be used as a surrogate pharmacodynamic biomarker for objective treatment monitoring.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document