scholarly journals Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Right Ventricular Diastolic Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Harada ◽  
Takahisa Noto ◽  
Junya Takagawa
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Liang ◽  
R Hearse-Morgan ◽  
S Fairbairn ◽  
Y Ismail ◽  
AK Nightingale

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND The recent Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus guidelines on diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have developed a simple diagnostic algorithm for clinical use. PURPOSE To assess whether echocardiogram (echo) parameters needed to assess diastolic function are routinely collected in patients referred for assessment of heart failure symptoms. METHODS Retrospective analysis of echo referrals in January 2020 were assessed for parameters of diastolic function as per step 2 of the HF-PEFF diagnostic algorithm.  Echo images and clinical reports were reviewed. Electronic records were utilised to obtain clinical history, blood results (NT-proBNP) and demographic data. RESULTS 1330 patients underwent an echo in our department during January 2020. 83 patients were referred with symptoms of heart failure without prior history of cardiac disease; 20 patients found to have impaired left ventricular (LV) function were excluded from analysis. Of the 63 patients with possible HFpEF, HF-PEFF score was low in 18, intermediate in 33 and high in 12. Median age was 68 years (range 32 to 97 years); 25% had a BMI >30. There was a high prevalence of hypertension (52%), diabetes (19%) and atrial fibrillation (40%) (cf. Table 1). Body surface area (BSA) was documented in 65% of echo reports. Most echo parameters were recorded with the exception of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and indexed LV mass (cf. image 1). NT-proBNP was recorded in only 20 patients (31.7%). 12 patients with an intermediate HF-PEFF score could have been re-categorised to a high score depending on GLS and NT-proBNP (which were not recorded). CONCLUSION More than three quarters of echoes acquired in our department obtained the relevant parameters to assess diastolic function. The addition of BSA, and inclusion of NT-proBNP, and GLS would have been additive to a third of ‘intermediate’ patients to determine definite HFpEF. Our study demonstrates that the current HFA-ESC diagnostic algorithm and HF-PEFF scoring system are easy to use, highly relevant and applicable to current clinical practice. Age >70 years 29 (46.0%) Obesity (BMI >30) 16 (25.4%) Diabetes 12 (19%) Hypertension 33 (52.4%) Atrial Fibrillation 25 (39.7%) ECG abnormalities 18 (28.5%) Table 1. Prevalence of Clinical Risk Factors Abstract Figure. Image 1. HFPEFF score & echo parameters


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Dzeshka ◽  
E Shantsila ◽  
V A Snezhitskiy ◽  
G Y H Lip

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) commonly coexist. AF is associated with left atrial (LA) and ventricular (LV) myocardial fibrosis, contributing to diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF. Many profibrotic pathways have been studied in AF and HFpEF, but scarce data are available on the role of circulating microparticles (MPs). Purpose To evaluate association of circulating biomarkers of fibrosis and MPs subsets with Doppler-derived parameters of diastolic function in AF and HFpEF. Methods We studied 274 patients with non-valvular AF and HFpEF (median age 62 years, 37% females). Paroxysmal AF was diagnosed in 150 patients (55%) and non-paroxysmal AF (persistent or permanent) in 124 (45%). Median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 in males and 4 in females. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to assess LV diastolic function, including early mitral inflow velocity (E), E/A velocities ratio (on sinus rhythm), early mitral annular diastolic velocity (E') for LV septal and lateral basal regions, E/E' ratio, LA maximum volume index (LAVi), E-wave velocity deceleration time (DT), flow propagation velocity (Vp). Average values from ten consecutive cardiac cycles were calculated. E/E' ratio was chosen as valid and reproducible index of diastolic function in AF patients for regression analysis. Blood levels of galectin 3, interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 (ST2), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), procollagen type III aminoterminal propeptide (PIIINP), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), angiotensin II and aldosterone level were assayed as surrogate biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis and profibrotic signaling. Using microflow cytometry, numbers of platelet-derived (CD42b+), monocyte-derived (CD14+), endothelial (CD144+), and apoptotic MPs (Annexin V+) were quantified in plasma samples. Linear regression was used to reveal parameters associated with diastolic function assessed as E/E' ratio. Data were normalized with Box-Cox transformation. Results Grade I diastolic dysfunction was found in 149 (54%); 94 (34%), and 31 (11%) patients had grade II and grade III diastolic dysfunction, respectively. On univariate analysis, age (β=0.23, p=0.0001); male gender (β=-0.19, p=0.02); history of hypertension (β=0.15, p=0.02); AF type, i.e. progression from paroxysmal to permanent (β=0.14, p=0.02); AnV+ MPs (β=0.19, p=0.01); angiotensin II (β=0.13, p=0.04); ST2 (β=0.1, p=0.04); and TIMP-1 (β=0.13, p=0.03) were associated with E/E' ratio. Using stepwise multivariate regression, AnV+ MPs (β=0.15, p=0.01) and TIMP-1 (β=0.3, p=0.04) remained significant predictors of E/E' ratio, adjusted for age, gender, hypertension and AF type. Relation of E/E' to TIMP-1 and AnV+ MPs Conclusion Apoptotic (AnV+) MPs and TIMP-1 were independently associated with diastolic dysfunction in AF and HFpEF. These may contribute to the pathophysiology of AF and HFpEF, and complications related to the presence of both. Acknowledgement/Funding ESC Research Grant, EHRA Academic Research Fellowship Programme


Cor et Vasa ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-303
Author(s):  
Noha Hassanin Hanboly ◽  
Yasser Mohamed Baghdady ◽  
Sameh Mohamed Helmy El-Kaffas ◽  
Tamer Ashraf Hassanien Mohamed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document