Supracondylar (fracture) of humerus in paediatric age group treated with closed reduction versus k-wire fixation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 09-14
Author(s):  
Ravi Shankar Kumar ◽  
◽  
Siddhartha Kumar Shrest ◽  
Benu Gopal Das ◽  
◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Dhoju ◽  
D Shrestha ◽  
N Parajuli ◽  
G Dhakal ◽  
R Shrestha

Background Supracondylar fracture and forearm bone fracture in isolation is common musculoskeletal injury in pediatric age group But combined supracondylar fracture with ipsilateral forearm bone fracture, also known as floating elbow is not common injury. The incidence of this association varies between 3% and 13%. Since the injury is rare and only limited literatures are available, choosing best management options for floating elbow is challenging. Method In retrospective review of 759 consecutive supracondylar fracture managed in between July 2005 to June 2011, children with combined supracondylar fracture with forearm bone injuries were identified and their demographic profiles, mode of injury, fracture types, treatment procedures, outcome and complications were analyzed. Result Thirty one patients (mean age 8.91 yrs, range 2-14 yrs; male 26; left side 18) had combined supracondylar fracture and ipsilateral forearm bone injury including four open fractures. There were 20 (64.51%) Gartland type III (13 type IIIA and 7 type III B), seven (22.58 %) type II, three (9.67 %) type I and one (3.22 %) flexion type supracondylar fracture. Nine patients had distal radius fracture, six had distal third both bone fracture, three had distal ulna fracture, two had mid shaft both bone injury and one with segmental ulna with distal radius fracture. There were Monteggia fracture dislocation, proximal ulna fracture, olecranon process fracture, undisplaced radial head fracture of one each and two undisplaced coronoid process fracture. Type I supracondylar fracture with undisplaced forearm were treated with closed reduction and long arm back slab or long arm cast. Displaced forearm fracture required closed reduction and fixation with Kirschner wires or intramedullary nailing. Nineteen patients with Gartland type III fracture underwent operative intervention. Among them nine had closed reduction and K wire fixation for both supracondylar fracture and forearm bone injury. One patient with closed reduction and long arm cast application for both type III supracondylar fracture and distal third radius fracture developed impending compartment syndrome and required splitting of cast, remanipulation and Kirschner wire fixation. There were three radial nerve, one ulnar nerve and one median nerve injury and two postoperative ulnar nerve palsy. Three patients had pin tract related complications. Among type III, 16 (80%) patients had good to excellent, two had fair and one gad poor result in terms of Flynn’s criteria in three months follow up ConclusionDisplaced supracondylar fracture with ipsilateral displaced forearm bone injuries need early operative management in the form of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning which provides not only stable fixation but also allows close observation for early sign and symptom of development of any compartment syndrome.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v9i2.6280 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2011;9(2):11-16 


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1h) ◽  
pp. 495-498
Author(s):  
Dr. Suresh Babu Surapaneni ◽  
Dr. Sunil Koneru ◽  
Dr. Venkata Suresh Babu Tummala ◽  
Dr. Giridhar Boyapati ◽  
Dr. Somanatham Vithala

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 753
Author(s):  
Byung Woo Ahn ◽  
Chong Kwan Kim ◽  
Jeong Hwan Kim ◽  
Chae Ik Chung ◽  
Jae Kyu Park ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dr. Sanjay Upadhyay ◽  
◽  
Dr. Sunil Kumar Kirar ◽  
Dr. Sanat Singh ◽  
Dr. Atul Varshney ◽  
...  

Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the presentation and postoperative resultsof children treated by open reduction and closed reduction for completely displaced Gartland type IIIsupracondylar humerus fractures (SCFs). Method: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is acommon paediatric fracture seen in our OPD. Among them Type III fractures are displaced with nocortical contact, and reduction is difficult, and maintaining reduction is almost impossible withoutsome form of internal fixation. Therefore during surgery of type 3 fractures, fixation is done by twomethods. 1 open reduction and fixation with 2 cross k-wire 2. closed reduction and fixation with 2cross k-wire fixation. Following pinning, the elbow was immobilized in an above elbow slab inpronation with the elbow at 75 degrees of flexion. Result: The average age of patients was 5 years(age range, 3 to 10 years). The test population consisted of 18female (36%) and 32 male (64%)patients. There were 31 fractures (62%) in the right elbow and 19 fractures (38%) in the left. Group1 patients stayed in the hospital for 5 days while Group 2 stayed for only 2 days in the hospital. Alsogroup 1 patient required follow-up at eight postoperative days (for check dressing) and 11postoperative days for stitch removal while group 2 patients were directly called for k-wire removalat 3 weeks postoperatively. Both groups of patients were called after three weeks for k-wireremoval. Mean clinical follow-up for both groups was 6 months. Conclusion: The closed reductiontechnique was preferred because it required less hospitalization time, less number followup, andresulted in almost no visible surgical scars.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
Vidya M Saravagol ◽  
◽  
Deepak Shanbhag ◽  
Ashraf Ahamed ◽  
Kartik Sadananda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document