A Historiography of Settlement Archaeology in Southeast Asia, with Emphasis on the Pre-industrial State Formations | မြို့ပြြထွန်းကားြီအချက်အလက်ြျားအပြါ်ြူတည်လျက် အပှေ့ပတာင်အာှေှေိ အပပခချပနထိုင်ပခင်းဆိုင်ှာပှေးပောင်းသုပတသ နပလ့လာြှုသြုငိ ်း

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyles Iannone ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Settlement Archaeology ◽  
Industrial State ◽  
Classical States

Although it certainly comes with a unique set of challenges, the small number of projects carried out across Southeast Asia to date have demonstrated the efficacy that settlement archaeology holds for expanding on our traditional understandings of the region’s pre-industrial state formations. This discussion presents a brief historiography of the settlement archaeology projects that have focused on the “classical” states of Southeast Asia, and in doing so highlights the theories, methods, applications, and outcomes of these investigations. The need for more excavations to be carried out in the context of commoner habitation sites is underscored. အ ခြေ ေျ ခေ ထို င် ြေ င်း များ ခေ့ ော ော ရာ တွ င် စိ ေ် ခေါ် မှု များ စွာ ရှိ ခေ မ ည် ြြ စ် ခော် ေ ည်း၊ အခရှ့ခတာင် အာရှခေေတွင်ြြုေုြ်ေဲ့ကြေည့် ေုခတေေေုြ်ငေ်းအေည်းငယ်မှ ထွြ်ခြါ်ောခော နှစ်ေြ်တမ်း တွြ်ေျြ်မှုများေည် မမို့ြြမထွေ်းြားမီအခကြာင်းအ ရာများြို ြိုမိုေားေည်ေခောခြါြ်ောခစရေ် အတွြ် အခထာြ်အြူြြုေျြ်ရှိေည်။ ယေုခွွးခနွးတင်ြြမည့် အခြေေျခေထိုင်ြေင်းွိုင်ရာ ခရှးခောင်းေုခတေေခေ့ောမှုေ မိုင်းအြျဉ်းေျုြ်ေည် အခရှ့ခတာင်အာရှခေေရှိ ဂန္ထဝင်တွင်ခော မမို့ြြနိုင်ငံကြီးများြို အဓိြထားခေ့ောထားမြီး၊ ေီအိုရီများ၊ ေည်းေမ်းများ၊ ေြ်ခတွ့ခွာင်ရွြ် ေျြ်များနှင့် ထွြ်ခြါ်ောေည့် ရေေ်များြို တင်ြြမည်ြြစ်ြါေည်။ ခရှးခေတ်ောမာေ်အရြ်ေားများ ၏ အိမ်ယာအခြေေျခေထိုင်မှုများြို ခြာ်ထုတ်နိုင်ရေ်အတွြ် ထြ်မံေိုအြ်ခေမည့် တူးခြာ်ခေ့ောခရး ေုြ်ငေ်းများအခကြာင်းြို တင်ြြေွားမည်ြြစ်ြါေည်။

The “Classical” in Southeast Asia: The Present in the Past

1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Aung-Thwin
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Classical Period ◽  
The Past ◽  
Classical States

When historians refer to the “classical” period in Southeast Asia, they usually mean the era roughly between the ninth and fourteenth centuriesA.d.When they speak of the “classical” states, they are referring most often to the region's first great kingdoms — Pagan, Sukhothai, Angkor, Dai Viet, Srivijaya, and Majapahit — the civilizations that gave birth to many of the nations in Southeast Asia today. Yet, the very idea of a “classical” Southeast Asia has not been debated sufficiently in the literature.

Local Integration and Eurasian Analogies: Structuring Southeast Asian History, c. 1350—c. 1830

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Lieberman
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Fourteenth Century ◽  
Economic History ◽  
Southeast Asian ◽  
Systematic Overview ◽  
Local Integration ◽  
Magnum Opus ◽  
Asian History ◽  
Classical States

The historiography of precolonial Southeast Asia remains remarkably fragmented and inaccessible, even by the standards of that variegated region. We have a limited number of country monographs. But no systematic overview of Southeast Asian political or economic history has been attempted for all, or even part, of the period between the waning of the classical states in the fourteenth century and the onset of high colonialism in the early nineteenth. Scholarly surveys, like the magisterial and still standardmagnum opusof D. G. E. Hall, make discretion the better part of valor by providing separate country chapters without integrative theme or comment.

Centers, Symbols, and Hierarchies. Essays on the Classical States of Southeast Asia.

1985 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Victor Lieberman ◽  
Lorraine Gesick
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Classical States

On The Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia

1961 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. W. Small
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Contemporary History ◽  
The Past ◽  
History Of

It is generally accepted that history is an element of culture and the historian a member of society, thus, in Croce's aphorism, that the only true history is contemporary history. It follows from this that when there occur great changes in the contemporary scene, there must also be great changes in historiography, that the vision not merely of the present but also of the past must change.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document