scholarly journals Clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of patients with ovarian cancer, Fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal can

2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (11-12) ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim M. Zardawi

Primary fallopian tube cancer (PFTC) is a rare gynaecological malignancy, clinically often mistaken for pelvic inflammatory disease or ovarian cancer. Three primary fallopian tube carcinomas, arising in a background of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), are presented. The possible association between chronic PID and PFTC is discussed and a hypothesies linking these cancers with chronic inflammation is proposed.


2003 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurie Markman ◽  
Kristine Zanotti ◽  
Kenneth Webster ◽  
Gertrude Peterson ◽  
Barbara Kulp ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5539-5539 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Konner ◽  
D. Grabon ◽  
S. Pezzulli ◽  
A. Iasonos ◽  
P. Sabbatini ◽  
...  

5539 Background: IP cisplatin (Cis) plus IV/IP paclitaxel (Tax) is a standard therapy for optimally debulked ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab (Bev) is a recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor. Activity of Bev in recurrent ovarian cancer has been reported in phase II trials. In this study IP Cis and IV/IP Tax are combined with IV Bev as front-line therapy. Methods: Patients with optimal (<1 cm residual), FIGO stage II or III, epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, acceptable organ function, and KPS ≥ 70% are eligible. Patients receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy plus Bev: Tax 135 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours on Day 1, Cis 75 mg/m2 IP on Day 2, Tax 60 mg/m2 IP on Day 8, Bev 15 mg/kg IV on Day 1 (starting cycle 2). Bev is continued every 3 weeks for 17 treatments after chemotherapy is complete. This study will enroll 41 patients. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability, determined by whether at least 60% of patients complete the prescribed 6 cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy without unacceptable toxicity. Results: Thirty-nine women [median age 56 (40–69)] have been treated on study: 26 (67%) completed 6 IV/IP cycles; 5 (13%) are receiving ongoing IV/IP treatment; 4 (10%) experienced IP port malfunction (3 finished 5 IV/IP cycles, 1 came off study for port revision); 3 (8%) switched from IP Cis to IV carboplatin due to grade 3 nephrotoxicity in cycle 1 (n = 2) or grade 3 hypertension in cycle 6 (n = 1); and 1 (2.5%) patient died following rectosigmoid anastomotic dehiscence during cycle 4. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities include hypertension (10%), vasovagal events (10%), neutropenia (26%), nausea/vomiting (10%), and hypomagnesemia (8%). There were 3 occurrences of grade 3 abdominal pain (8%); and 3 adhesion-related grade 3 small bowel obstructions (8%), during cycles 3, 9, and 15, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of Bev to this IV/IP regimen appears to be feasible. Bev may increase the risk of small bowel obstruction/perforation in these patients. Enrollment continues and updated results will be presented. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document