Permeability Anisotropy Effect in Reservoir Characterization: New Rock Typing Approach

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Rock Typing ◽  
Anisotropy Effect ◽  
Permeability Anisotropy

scholarly journals Petrophysics Analysis for Reservoir Characterization of Upper Plover Formation in the Field “A”, Bonaparte Basin, Offshore Timor, Maluku, Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sugeng Sapto Surjono ◽  
Indra Arifianto
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Core Data ◽  
Class A ◽  
Rock Types ◽  
Rock Typing ◽  
Volume Porosity ◽  
Potential Reservoir

Hydrocarbon potential within Upper Plover Formation in the Field “A” has not been produced due to unclear in understanding of reservoir problem. This formation consists of heterogeneous reservoir rock with their own physical characteristics. Reservoir characterization has been done by applying rock typing (RT) method utilizing wireline logs data to obtain reservoir properties including clay volume, porosity, water saturation, and permeability. Rock types are classified on the basis of porosity and permeability distribution from routines core analysis (RCAL) data. Meanwhile, conventional core data is utilized to depositional environment interpretations. This study also applied neural network methods to rock types analyze for intervals reservoir without core data. The Upper Plover Formation in the study area indicates potential reservoir distributes into 7 parasequences. Their were deposited during transgressive systems in coastal environments (foreshore - offshore) with coarsening upward pattern during Middle to Late Jurassic. The porosity of reservoir ranges from 1–19 % and permeability varies from 0.01 mD to 1300 mD. Based on the facies association and its physical properties from rock typing analysis, the reservoir within Upper Plover Formation can be grouped into 4 reservoir class: Class A (Excellent), Class B (Good), Class C (Poor), and Class D (Very Poor). For further analysis, only class A-C are considered as potential reservoir, and the remain is neglected.

A fully-integrated approach for rock typing: A new approach to reservoir characterization

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razieh Eskandari ◽  
Mohammad Reza Kamali ◽  
Shahram Sherkati and Amir Abbas Askari
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Fully Integrated ◽  
Rock Typing

Integrating Rock Typing Methods Including Empirical, Deterministic, Statistical, Probabilistic, Predictive Techniques and New Applications for Practical Reservoir Characterization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary William William Gunter ◽  
Mohamed Yacine Yacine Sahar ◽  
David F. Allen ◽  
Eduardo Jose Viro ◽  
Shahin Negabahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Rock Typing ◽  
Open Hole ◽  
Infill Drilling ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Predictive Approaches ◽  
3D Volume ◽  
New Applications

Abstract This paper discusses integrating common methods and applications for "Rock Typing" (also known as Petrophysical Rock Typing-PRT) including empirical, deterministic, statistical, probalistic and automatic/predictive approaches. Many industry asset teams apply one or more of these methods when creating static reservoir models, using dynamic reservoir simulations, completing petrophysical studies for saturation height models and determining reservoir volumetrics as part of reservoir characterization studies. Our intention is to provide guidance and important information on how and when to use the various methods, so people can make an informed selection. This discussion is important as many disciplines apply these PRT techniques without understanding the pros, cons and limitations of the different methods. An important tool is comparing PRT results from multiple methods. The topics and workflows that are covered focus on various PRT techniques and workflows. We will use case-studies to illustrate the key features and make important comparisons. Key results include comparing pros and cons, how to use and combine multiple PRT techniques and verify results. This paper includes these techniques and workflows;MICP, core analysis and pore throat calibration.Core-Log Integration focused on PRT analysis.Winland, Pittman, Aguilera and Hartmann et.al Gameboard methods.K-Phi ratio, Flow Zone Indicators and Rock Quality Index methods.Classic, Modified and Stratigraphic Lorenz methods.IPSOM and HRA Probabilistic methods.Case Study – Super Plot and Advanced Automatic PRT Method.Special Topics – Carbonate Methods, NMR and Single Well Vertical Line. Practical approaches based on case studies show how PRT analysis can be applied in mature fields to identify by-passed hydrocarbon zones and zones that have a high probability of producing water using open hole, cased hole and production logs. Traditional Rock Typing (PRT) analysis can be applied as a single well technique or as a multi-well method so operations teams can identify additional business opportunities (remedial workovers, infill drilling locations or exploitation targets) and compare reservoir performance with intrinsic rock properties. New applications and additional topics cover single, multiple well approaches and new emerging PRT techniques (including NMR well logs and machine learning). We recommend how to merge classic facies with PRT analysis for 3-D applications including populating a 3D volume.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document