scholarly journals Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don MacDiarmid ◽  
Jo Anne Strekaf ◽  
J.P. Pham

The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of recent Canadian judicial decisions of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors have surveyed Canadian case law in various areas including contract, creditors' rights, employment, royalties split title, surface rights, environmental and taxation.

2018 ◽  
pp. 479
Author(s):  
Olivia C. Dixon ◽  
Colin Feasby ◽  
Jung Lee

This article summarizes a number of recent judicial decisions of interest to energy lawyers. The authors review and comment on the past year’s case law in several areas including contractual interpretation, employment and labour law, Aboriginal law, constitutional law, intellectual property, bankruptcy and insolvency, and selected developments relating to summary judgments. Specific topics addressed include the appropriate standard of review, workplace drug and alcohol testing policies, appellate intervention in commercial arbitration, the appropriateness of granting summary judgments, valuation of dissenting shareholders’ shares, a duty to consult, the applicability of municipal bylaws when they conflict with federal legislation, and the rights and obligations of oil and gas companies placed into receivership. For each case, some background information is given, followed by a brief explanation of the facts, a summary of the decision, and commentary on the outcome.


2015 ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Mark Houston ◽  
Thomas P. Donovan, QC ◽  
Robert W. Carmichael ◽  
Brandon Barnes

This article is intended to provide a brief review of recent Canadian judicial decisions of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors have surveyed Canadian case law in the areas of government regulation, conflicts, creditor's rights, surface rights, contract, tax. and other areas. Portions of many of thesesummaries have previously been published in the Cox Hanson O 'Reilly Matheson Oil and Gas Netletter on the Quicklaw service operated by LexisNexis Canada Inc.


2015 ◽  
pp. 661
Author(s):  
David J. Stanford ◽  
Sean S. Smyth

This article is intended to provide a brief review of recent Canadian judicial decisions of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors have surveyed Canadian case law in the areas of government regulation, contract, employment, rights of first refusal, royalties,injunctions, freehold leases, and other areas.


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Edward A. Leew ◽  
Michael A. Thackray

The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of recent Canadian judicial decisions of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors have surveyed Canadian case law in the areas of contract, rights, government regulation, freehold leases, land titles, surface rights, trusts and tax.


1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Edward A. Leew ◽  
Michael A. Thackray

The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of recent Canadian judicial decisions rendered to June 1991 and of interest particularly to oil and gas lawyers. The authors have surveyed Canadian case law in the areas of the environment, surface rights, contract, government regulation, land titles, tax, freehold leases and creditor's rights.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Carscallen ◽  
Donald C. Edie ◽  
Rosa Beck ◽  
Vera A. Slawinski

The purpose of the article is to provide a brief review of recent Canadian judicial decisions of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors have surveyed Canadian case law in the areas of government regulation, conflicts, creditor’s rights, surface rights, contracts and tax.


1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
John G. McDonald

Federal income taxation is an area ofincreasing concern to the resource industries. The author deals with current developments in the taxation field as they affect the oil and gas industry. The paper gives general over-view of case law and statutes. The applicable budgets, both Federal and Provincial, are also discussed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
William H. Bonney ◽  
J. Jay Park

This article is a compilation of recent interesting and potentially influential decisions by Canadian courts. Of note also is a judgment by the House of Lords that appears to significantly restrain the applicability of Rylands v. Fletcher. The authors have surveyed case law development in such areas as contracts, lands, leases and titles, fiduciary duties, tax, the environment, torts, surface rights, governmental regulation, offshore drilling, creditors' rights and administrative law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-260
Author(s):  
Christian Martinez

Organizations often conduct probing self-studies to review internally existing policies, procedures, and business methods. Yet, despite an increasing social need for these studies, the Texas legislature has yet to construct a privilege designed to protect an organization from being harmed from these studies by adverse litigants. The self-critical analysis privilege, or SCAP, is an alluring, common law doctrine that protects the free flow of information sharing through an organization’s self-assessment. This Comment proposes a model statute for the codification of the SCAP for the consideration of the Texas legislature. This model statute is not a general codification of the privilege. Instead, the statute is meant to apply only to Texas’s Design-Build industry. This Comment discusses the significant policy considerations supporting the SCAP and analyzes case law to derive proper drafting language. Although this proposed model statute narrowly applies to Texas’s Design-Build industry, the hope is to have a workable statute that could apply to general products, oil and gas, and other property related industries.


2000 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 327-350
Author(s):  
Nicola Notaro

Hundreds of studies have been conducted by lawyers, economists and political scientists on international trade and environment, yet very few attempts have been made to compare judicial decisions adopted in this area by the European Court of Justice, its Court of First Instance, and GATT/WTO rulings on trade and environment. Most of the existing publications are either limited in scope, because they only focus on a comparison of two cases at any one time, or are outdated, especially in the light of innovative European and Appellate Body jurisprudence of the last few years. Here, a comparison of the main trade and environment themes traversing the two bodies of case-law, including procedural issues, will be undertaken. This will cast light on the means by which the current tension between trade and environment might be resolved. Account will be taken of the different “constitutional” positions of judicial bodies in the two legal orders, the role played by the presence (or absence) of the legislator, and its influence on reasoning in judicial decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document