scholarly journals Estimating survival distributions for two-stage adaptive treatment strategies: A simulation study

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-424
Author(s):  
Sifiso Vilakati ◽  
Giuliana Cortese ◽  
Thembelihle Dlamini
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 760-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Marcia Valenstein ◽  
Paul Pfeiffer ◽  
Dara Ganoczy

Biometrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noémi Kreif ◽  
Oleg Sofrygin ◽  
Julie A. Schmittdiel ◽  
Alyce S. Adams ◽  
Richard W. Grant ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Romain S. Neugebauer ◽  
Julie A. Schmittdiel ◽  
Patrick J. O’Connor ◽  
Mark J. van der Laan

Author(s):  
Alena I. Oetting ◽  
Janet A Levy

The past two decades have brought new pharmacotherapies as well as behavioral therapies to the field of drug-addiction treatment (Carroll & Onken, 2005; Carroll, 2005; Ling & Smith, 2002; Fiellin, Kleber, Trumble-Hejduk, McLellan, & Kosten, 2004). Despite this progress, the treatment of addiction in clinical practice often remains a matter of trial and error. Some reasons for this difficulty are as follows. First, to date, no one treatment has been found that works well for most patients; that is, patients are heterogeneous in response to any specific treatment. Second, as many authors have pointed out (McLellan, 2002; McLellan, Lewis, O’Brien, & Kleber, 2000), addiction is often a chronic condition, with symptoms waxing and waning over time. Third, relapse is common. Therefore, the clinician is faced with, first, finding a sequence of treatments that works initially to stabilize the patient and, next, deciding which types of treatments will prevent relapse in the longer term. To inform this sequential clinical decision making, adaptive treatment strategies, that is, treatment strategies shaped by individual patient characteristics or patient responses to prior treatments, have been proposed (Greenhouse, Stangl, Kupfer, & Prien, 1991; Murphy, 2003, 2005; Murphy, Lynch, Oslin, McKay, & Tenhave, 2006; Murphy, Oslin, Rush, & Zhu, 2007; Lavori & Dawson, 2000; Lavori, Dawson, & Rush, 2000; Dawson & Lavori, 2003). Here is an example of an adaptive treatment strategy for prescription opioid dependence, modeled with modifications after a trial currently in progress within the Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Weiss, Sharpe, & Ling, 2010). . . . Example . . . . . . First, provide all patients with a 4-week course of buprenorphine/naloxone (Bup/Nx) plus medical management (MM) plus individual drug counseling (IDC) (Fiellin, Pantalon, Schottenfeld, Gordon, & O’Connor, 1999), culminating in a taper of the Bup/Nx. If at any time during these 4 weeks the patient meets the criterion for nonresponse, a second, longer treatment with Bup/Nx (12 weeks) is provided, accompanied by MM and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). However, if the patient remains abstinent from opioid use during those 4 weeks, that is, responds to initial treatment, provide 12 additional weeks of relapse prevention therapy (RPT). . . .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document