scholarly journals Malnutrition Research Output: A Bibliometric Analysis for articles Index in Web of Science between 1900 and 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. em293
Author(s):  
Taha Hussein Musa ◽  
Tosin Yinka Akintunde ◽  
Hassan Hussein Musa ◽  
Upama Ghimire ◽  
Ghislaine Gatasi
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output

scholarly journals Mapping the global research output on Ebola vaccine from research indexed in web of science and scopus: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Tosin Yinka Akintunde ◽  
Taha Hussein Musa ◽  
Hassan Hussein Musa ◽  
Shaojun Chen ◽  
Elhakim Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Global Research

scholarly journals Assessing the Coronavirus Research Output: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092097511
Author(s):  
Asifa Ali ◽  
Irfan Ahmad Hakak ◽  
Faseeh Amin
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Subject Field ◽  
The Subject

The aim of this article is to examine the bibliometric analysis of global publication output on coronavirus, as covered in Web of Science during the period from 2000 to 2019. A total of 10,861 documents were found during a 20-year period spanning from 2000 to 2019 published in the ISI Web of Science. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. The findings reveal that the most productive year of publication was 2004 that included 782 publications with the majority published in the Journal of Virology. The result further indicates that the USA, China and Germany are the most productive countries in the field of Coronavirus research output. In terms of institutional output, University of Hong Kong emerged as the most productive institution; Yuen KY from Hong Kong is the most prolific author. In the subject category type, the most prominent subject field is Virology, Infectious Disease and Veterinary Science. The findings of the study are limited to the data harvested from ‘Web of Science’. This study is of immense relevance to researchers and academicians who are searching for answers to this pandemic. This will provide insights to academicians to collaborate with other researchers based on the quality of the research produced by other countries and institutes. The study is useful for researchers, immunologists and epidemiologists who are interested in the field of Coronavirus and serves as a base for future research.

scholarly journals The Pandemic of the COVID-19 Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis Running Title: Bibliometric Analysis of the COVID-19 Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elie A. Akl ◽  
Lokman I. Meho ◽  
Sarah H. Farran ◽  
Ali A. Nasrallah ◽  
Bachir Ghandour
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
International Collaboration ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Personal Narratives ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Research Themes ◽  
Governmental Funding

Abstract BackgroundThe research interest in COVID-19, one of the most serious pandemics in recent human history, is unprecedented. This study aims to determine the volume of COVID-19 research and to assess the characteristics of its production and publication.MethodsWe searched Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and the Web of Science databases for publications, up to August 20, 2020. We included all types of documents except corrections, interviews, personal narratives, and retracted publications. We analyzed publication count, type, status, research themes, publication venues, authorship trends, language, institutions, countries, collaboration, and funding.ResultsOf 40,519 eligible documents, 49% were original articles. Forty-nine percent of the original articles and reviews were published in top quartile journals, and 19% were single-authored. More than half of the documents were produced in the United States, China, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Twenty-two percent of the documents involved international collaboration and 17% reported financial support by at least one agency, with the National Natural Science Foundation of China being the most frequently reported funding source (n=982). There are already more documents published on COVID19 than documents ever published on the Ebola, MERS, HIN1, and SARS combined.ConclusionsThe first few months’ research output on COVID-19 is relatively large and originated mostly from four countries. Single-authored publications, international collaboration, and governmental funding activities were relatively common.

scholarly journals A Bibliometric Analysis in the Field of Pediatric Anesthesia and Turkey’s Contribution to Research

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pınar Ayvat
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Pediatric Anesthesia ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Field Methods ◽  
Performance Results ◽  
Science Citation Index Expanded ◽  
Different Sources

Objective: Bibliometric analysis can be used to assess the contributions of scholars, institutions, countries by examining the materials published in a certain discipline. The objective of this study is to make a bibliometric analysis in the field of pediatric anesthesia and to examine Turkey’s contribution to research in this field. Methods: I used the search engine of the Web of Science (WoS), and included all types of contributions (original articles, reviews, letters, editorials, etc.) in the bibliometric analysis. I scanned Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) as they were the most relevant indexes for my study. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 22. I used a binomial test to make a comparison between Turkey and other countries in terms of research output, and academic performance. Results: Pediatric Anesthesia is the only journal that positions itself in WoS categories of both “pediatrics” and “anesthesia”. A total of 5,791 citations were found in this particular journal of which 227 were from Turkey. In addition to this journal, 2,096 published materials were found in 433 different sources. Turkish authors have made only 61 contributions to these journals. Hacettepe University, Istanbul University, and Baskent University are the predominant institutions from Turkey accounting for a total of 80 published materials. Conclusion: The findings of this bibliometric analysis not only showed the contribution of Turkish authors to the field of pediatric anesthesia but also revealed the areas of improvement for their future research. The study also showed a list of journals that publish articles in the area of pediatric anesthesia.

Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science–Indexed Papers on Concrete Segmental Bridges

PCI Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José R. Martí-Vargas ◽  
Emili García-Taengua ◽  
W. Micah Hale ◽  
Mohamed K. ElBatanouny ◽  
Paul H. Ziehl
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Segmental Bridges

Questions to the Article of research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Chun Kuo ◽  
Tsair-Wei Chien ◽  
Willy Chou
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Visual Representations ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Pubmed Central ◽  
The Us ◽  
Circle Diagram

UNSTRUCTURED We read with great interest the study by Grammes et al. on research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper is a quantitative study using scientometric analysis instead of a qualitative research using citation analysis. A total of 7,185 publications were extracted from Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) with keywords of “covid19 OR covid-19 OR sarscov2 OR sars-cov-2” as of July 4, 2020. We replicated a citation analysis study to extract abstracts from Pubmed Central(PMC) with similar keywords mentioned above and obtained 35,421 articles relevant to COVID-10 matching their corresponding number of citation in PMC. one hundred top-cited atricles were selected and compared on diagrams. Social network analysis combined with citation numbers in articles was performed to analyze international cooperation among countries. The results were shown on a world map instead of the circle diagram in the previous study. A Sankey diagram was applied to highlight entities(e.g., countries, article types, medical subject headings, and journals) with the most citations. Authors from Chian dominated citations in these 100 top-cited articles rather than the US in publications addressed in the previous study. Both visual representations of the world map and Sankey diagram were provided to readers with a better understanding of the research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

scholarly journals Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 7102
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina V. Nadalini ◽  
Ricardo de Araujo Kalid ◽  
Ednildo Andrade Torres
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Ecological Aspects ◽  
Valuation Of Ecosystem Services ◽  
Emergy Evaluation

The objective of this paper is to present a review of current research on the valuation of ecosystem services, using emergy evaluation methodology (EME). A bibliometric analysis and a systematic review were carried out between 2000 and 2020, using all of Web of Science database subfields that collected 187 papers, selected through the keywords “emergy” and “ecosystem services”. In the second part of the research, we carried out a new search on Web of Science of the 187 initial articles produced, with the words “valuation” and “economic”, in order to analyze those directly related to the evaluation of ecosystem services. The results showed that the EME method is an effective tool to evaluate ecosystem services, since it relates economic and ecological aspects in the evaluations. The research also indicated that the use of isolated methods does not appear to be the most appropriate solution, and that emergy used in combination with other methodologies can be used to obtain more accurate and comprehensive results to evaluate natural resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document