Global and Regional Variations in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comparison of Longitudinal Strain and 99mTechnetium Pyrophosphate Imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. jnmt.120.261893
Author(s):  
Christopher Lee ◽  
Chieh-Ju Chao ◽  
Pradyumna Agasthi ◽  
Amith Seri ◽  
Amar Shere ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Bostan ◽  
Umit Yasar Sinan ◽  
Polat Canbolat ◽  
Serdar Kucukoglu

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-486
Author(s):  
Olena Nemchyna ◽  
Rolf Gebker ◽  
Felix Schoenrath ◽  
Christoph Knosalla ◽  
Volkmar Falk ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia M Simkowski ◽  
Michael Jiang ◽  
NADIA El HANGOUCHE ◽  
Jeesoo Lee ◽  
Milica Marion ◽  
...  

Introduction: Relative apical longitudinal strain (RALS) is defined as (average apical LS/(average basal & mid-ventricular LS)). A threshold of 2 has been found to have high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This threshold was developed using General Electric (GE) software, and its reproducibility among different software vendors is unknown. Hypothesis: In patients with CA, regional segmental LS patterns and relative apical longitudinal strain will vary among software vendors. Methods: Speckle-tracking echocardiography was retroactively performed by an experienced technician on two patient cohorts, CA (n=52) and LVH (n=52), using software from two independent vendors: EchoPAC (GE Medical Systems) and TomTEC (TOMTEC Imaging Systems GMBH). For each vendor and patient, strain values for the basal, mid, and apical segments were averaged to obtain three regional LS values which were then used to calculate global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RALS. Results: EchoPAC demonstrated greater average apical LS (-16.5±5.7 vs -13.1±6.6, p<0.001) and RALS (2.1±0.9 vs 1.7±0.7, p<0.001) compared to TomTEC. Bland-Altman analysis yielded a mean bias of -0.4 with limit of agreement 2.2 (p<0.001) in RALS between the two vendors. ROC curve analysis using a RALS cutoff of 2 to differentiate CA from the overall control group showed similarly high specificity (EchoPAC 85%, TomTEC 83%) between vendors but lower sensitivity for TomTEC (23% vs 45%) (Figure 1). LVH subgroup analysis showed similar comparisons. Overall difference in area-under-curve (AUC) was significant (AUC = 0.78 EchoPAC vs AUC = 0.52 TomTEC, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Software measurements of regional LS and thus RALS vary between vendors. Further efforts are needed for intervendor regional strain fidelity. For now, different RALS thresholds to diagnose CA may be needed for various vendors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Ramos Polo ◽  
S Moral Torres ◽  
C Tiron De Llano ◽  
M Morales Fornos ◽  
J M Frigola Marcet ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Differential diagnosis by echocardiography between cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is based on the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the entire myocardial wall. Nevertheless, histopathological studies describe a higher involvement of subendocardial tissue in CA. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the subanalysis of the GLS by layers (subendocardial and subepicardial) and segments (apical and basal) can provide further information. METHODS Retrospective study including 33 consecutive patients diagnosed with CA (with histological confirmation and imaging tests) or HCM by established criteria. Advanced myocardial deformation analysis software was used for both subendocardial and subepicardial evaluation of the left ventricle wall by transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS Seventeen patients (52%) had CA and sixteen (48%) had HCM. Differences were observed in LVEF (52.9 ± 10.9% vs 62.4 ±5.0%; p = 0.004), but not in the analysis of the entire wall GLS (-12.3 ± 4.9 vs -13.4 ± 2.8; p = 0.457) nor in the LVEF/GLS ratio (4.7 ± 1.4 vs 4.8 ± 1.1; p = 0.718). In the layered analysis there was no difference in subendocardial GLS (-16.2 ± 5.0 vs -16.4 ± 3.2%; p = 0.916) or subepicardial GLS (-11.7 ± 4.1 vs -11.6 ±2.7%; p = 0.945); however, the increase in GLS from base to apex was greater for CA than for HCM both at subepicardial level (increase: 101% vs 16%; p = 0.006) and subendocardial level (increase: 242% vs 114%; p = 0.006), with inversion of the greatest values for each group (Fig. 1).The ratio (apical GLS/basal GLS) was diagnostic predictor of CA (area under the curve = 86%; p = 0.002): a value &gt;2 presented a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 85% for the diagnosis of CA. CONCLUSIONS CA presents an impairment of both subendocardial and subepicardial deformation in transthoracic echocardiography. These patterns provide additional information on differential diagnosis with HCM. Abstract P940 Figure. Subendo vs subepicardial mean values


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C B Binder ◽  
F Duca ◽  
S Aschauer ◽  
R Rettl ◽  
L Camuz Ligios ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Apical sparing describes a reduced longitudinal strain in the basal segments and preserved or supranormal longitudinal strain in the apical segments of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium. This pattern has been described as a typical finding in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and restrictive cardiomyopathy. However, apical sparing is not a quantitative parameter and is fairly subjective to the echocardiographer's judgement. It is not known, if a certain degree of apical sparing is also present in patients with only mild LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction such as it is present in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods Patients with cardiac transthyretin and light chain amyloidosis and patients with HFpEF were included in a clinical registry at our outpatient clinic. CA was diagnosed according to current guidelines. All patients underwent a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) exam at the time of study inclusion. The TTE protocol included standard and speckle-tracking imaging to assess the presence of apical sparing as well as the basal to apical strain gradient. Patients with known coronary artery disease were excluded. Results In total 115 patients were included in this study. Of these, 87 (75.7%) were diagnosed with CA and 28 (24.3%) with HFpEF. Not surprisingly, apical sparing was found in a majority (86.2%) of patients with CA, however mild forms of this phenomenon were also present in 67.9% of patients with HFpEF (p=0.029, Figure 1). Median basal longitudinal strain was significantly more impaired in patients with CA (p<0.001) but there was no difference between longitudinal strain in the apical segments when comparing CA to HFpEF (p=0.443). This resulted in a higher median apical to basal strain gradient in patients with CA (2.3 (IQR 1.7–3.83) versus 1.13 (IQR 1.5–1.8), p<0.001). Figure 1 Conclusion Mild forms of apical sparing can be found in patients without CA. Gradual reduction in strain from base to apex could be an unspecific pathophysiologic mechanism which is remarkably pronounced in patients with CA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Geenty ◽  
S Sivapathan ◽  
T Deshmukh ◽  
P Brown ◽  
A Boyd ◽  
...  

Abstract Background AL-amyloidosis has a rapid clinical progression, with cardiac involvement associated with a particularly poor prognosis. Cardiac amyloidosis is diagnosed by either invasive biopsy or conventional echocardiographic parameters such as increased wall thickness, in the absence of other causes. More recently, novel parameters including 2D longitudinal strain have demonstrated diagnostic utility in a range of infiltrative cardiomyopathies including cardiac amyloidosis. Aim/Method: We sought to evaluate traditional and novel echocardiographic parameters in their ability to predict adverse outcomes in a cohort of AL-amyloid patients. 80 patients who had transthoracic echocardiograms at a single centre were included. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment was performed, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), LV mass (indexed to BSA). The primary endpoint was a composite of of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality, that was assessed by interrogation of the medical records on a specified censor date. Results At a mean follow-up (time from echo to censor date) of 5.4 ± 2.6years, 38/80 (47.5%) of patients experienced the primary endpoint of MACE or death, of which 25/80 (31%) were deaths. LVEF (59 ± 5.6%vs56 ± 6.4%, p = 0.04), GLS (17.4 ± 3.9%vs14.8 ± 4.9%, p = 0.01) basal longitudinal strain (12.3 ± 3.2%vs9.6 ± 3.9%, p = 0.002), indexed LV mass (107 ± 36g/m2vs130 ± 34g/m2, p = 0.06) and E/E’ (13.7 ± 4.9vs20.6 ± 9.6, p &lt; 0.001) were all significantly different between patients who experienced the primary endpoint and those that didn’t. The strongest predictors of outcome were E/E’ (AUC 0.74), LV mass (AUC 0.73) and the ratio GLS:LV mass (AUC 0.73). An E/E’ of 15 had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 69%, while an indexed LV mass of 108 had a sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 67% respectively. GLS to LV mass as a cutoff of 0.16 had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 69% respectively. Conclusion In a cohort of 80 patients with AL-amyloid cardiomyopathy, almost half (47.5%) reached the primary composite endpoint. Diastolic dysfunction as expressed as E/E’, and LV mass were the most powerful predictors of outcome, while global longitudinal strain and LV basal strain were also reduced, and showed superiority over LV ejection fraction in predicting prognosis.


2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. A362
Author(s):  
Karen M Modesto ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Sanderson Cauduro ◽  
Marek Belohlavek ◽  
Bijoy Khandheria ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document