BOOK REVIEW: Naldi, Gino J. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN NAMIBIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS. Ndabeni, South Africa: Juta and Co. 1995. and Dobell, Lauren. SWAPO'S STRUGGLE FOR NAMIBIA, 1960-1991: WAR BY OTHER MEANS. BASEL NAMIBIA STUDIES SERIES. and Forrest, Joshua Bernard. NAMIBIA'S POST-APARTHEID REGIONAL INSTITUTIONS: THE FOUNDING YEAR.

Africa Today ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 236-242
Author(s):  
William Lindeke
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
KAI MÖLLER

AbstractThe paper presents a theory of the moral structure of international human rights. It proceeds by drawing on recent scholarship on the philosophy of national constitutional rights, which has shown that there is now an emerging global consensus on certain structural features of constitutional rights; in previous work I have summarized this under the label ‘the global model of constitutional rights’. Starting from the theory of rights underlying the global model, the paper asks what modifications, if any, are required to turn that theory into a suitable theory of international human rights. In particular, it examines the widely held view that international human rights are more minimalist than national constitutional rights. Discussing recent work by Ronald Dworkin (on political/constitutional versus human rights) and Joseph Raz (on legitimate authority versus national sovereignty), the paper concludes that it is not possible to make rights more minimalist than they already are under the global model. It follows that the moral structures of national constitutional rights and international human rights are identical. The final section of the paper examines some implications of this result, addressing the issues of the workability of the proposed conception of international human rights in practice, its point and purpose, and discussing the obligations of states to participate in international mechanisms for the protection of human rights.


Obiter ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elijah Adewale Taiwo ◽  
Avinash Govindjee

This is the first of the two articles dealing with the implementation of the right to education in South Africa and Nigeria. The article examines the meaning and the process of implementation of the right to education as well as the general nature of states’ obligations under the international human rights instruments regarding the right to education. The article examines the measures put in place at the international level towards realizing the right to education. While this first article examines legislative measures, the follow-up article examines the non-legislative measures, that is, administrative measures as well as other measures put in place to ensure theimplementation of the right to education. The right to education is an empowerment right which is given wide recognition in a number of important international and regional human rights instruments as well as in national constitutions. The article argues that in terms of the international human rights instruments, states are obliged to make primary, secondary and higher levels of education available, accessible, acceptable and adaptable to all in their territories. It posits that by having ratified those international agreements in which the right to education is guaranteed, both South Africa and Nigeria assumed obligations under international law enjoining themto realize the right to education and to respect freedoms in education in their respective territories. It submits that, despite the international obligations and commitments to provide education for all, there is a significant gap between what is stipulated and the practical realities in the two countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document