scholarly journals Is the Prescription of Antidepressants for Bipolar Depression Justified from the Point of View of Evidence-Based Medicine?

Psychiatry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
S. S. Potanin ◽  
M. A. Morozova

Background: prescribing antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar depression remains highly controversial due to the inconsistence between routine clinical practice and the results of controlled trials. Purpose: to assess the validity of antidepressants use in bipolar depression from the point of view of evidence-based medicine. Material: database search (Scopus and MEDLINE) followed by analysis of studies concerning the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in bipolar depression treatment. Сonclusion: the search found 23 studies. There was a high degree of inconsistency in the results, apparently related to the methodology. Only two studies compared the effectiveness of antidepressants in monotherapy with placebo, with no differences found in the study with 740 participants and in the study with 70 participants with type 2 bipolar disorder antidepressants were found to be more effective than placebo. Nevertheless, both studies had significant methodological issues. In 6 studies comparing the effectiveness of the combination of antidepressants with mood stabilizers against the combination of mood stabilizers with placebo, only the effectiveness of fluoxetine in combination with olanzapine was revealed, other antidepressants were ineffective. At the same time, studies where antidepressants were compared with each other in combination with mood stabilizers revealed a significant clinical response to therapy. Analysis of routine clinical practice studies has shown that antidepressants are prescribed very often, for about 50% of patients with bipolar depression. International guidelines for therapy differ quite widely on the use of antidepressants in bipolar depression, but in principle allow their use. Thus, despite the contradictory literature data, the use of antidepressants in bipolar depression is justified from the point of view of evidence-based medicine for certain groups of patients with taking into account risk factors.

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 277-278
Author(s):  
Frank Holloway

In an era of evidence-based medicine, policy-makers and researchers are preoccupied by the task of ensuring that advances in research are implemented in routine clinical practice. This preoccupation has spawned a small but growing research industry of its own, with the development of resources such as the Cochrane Collaboration database and journals such as Evidence-Based Mental Health. In this paper, I adopt a philosophically quite unfashionable methodology – introspection – to address the question: how has research affected my practice?


Author(s):  
Abdullah Jibawi ◽  
Mohamed Baguneid ◽  
Arnab Bhowmick

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an effective tool for identifying and critically appraising quality research findings, and allowing the best to be integrated within clinical practice. EBM requires familiarity with evidence grading systems, key statistical methods, and requires a good understanding of how to review and critique scientific papers to guide the clinical practice. This chapter introduces these tools and provide an easy-to-use layout for reading academic papers in hand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document