scholarly journals What is new about hallux rigidus?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-192
Author(s):  
Ramón Viladot-Pericé ◽  
Antonio Viladot Voegeli

Hallux rigidus (HR) represents one of the most frequent forefoot disorders, together with hallux valgus and lateral toe deformities, being the most frequent degenerative process in the foot and ankle.This publication is the result of the collaboration of colleagues of the Spanish Society of Medicine and Foot and Ankle Surgery (Sociedad Española de Medicina y Cirugía del Pie y Tobillo, SEMCPT) and the Argentinean Society of Medicine and Foot and Leg Surgery (Sociedad Argentina de Medicina y Cirugía de Pie y Pierna, SAMCPP). It is an honor for us to have this work edited in the Journal of the Foot & Ankle, a journal with a marked Latin identity. We really thank Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos, Chairman of the Editorial Board, for his help and contribution. This update topic has been coordinated by R. Viladot Pericé and A. Viladot Voegeli, together with M. Herrera and M. Núñez-Samper.Considering the interest and the extent of this topic and, according to the coordinators, we have divided the publication into two parts. The first one describes general aspects (definition, etiology, classification, treatment algorithm, etc.) and the conservative treatment of HR, whereas the second one addresses the different surgical techniques described to treat this disease.The aim of this work is to review our knowledge on HR and to perform an update on the innovations that have emerged during the last years.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0009
Author(s):  
Adeshina Adeyemo ◽  
Umur Aydogan

Category Other Introduction/Purpose: In the world of foot and ankle surgery, much like other surgical fields, research has always been a strong foundation for advancing the field and making strides into improving our knowledge base, perfecting surgical techniques and discovering ways of improving patient outcomes. In recent years, there has been the advent of predatory journals in orthopaedic surgery, though many clinicians may not be familiar with what predatory journals are. The aim of our study is to objectively analyze F&A surgery predatory journals and compare them to higher impact journals in F&A surgery and dispute whether or not predatory journals are beneficial or detrimental to the field of F&A. Methods: Our inclusion criteria involved all existing foot and ankle journals that were considered to be predatory according to Beall’s criteria. Our authors viewed Beall’s online archive, in addition to a recent publication by Yang et al (4), in which we were able to gather a list of several predatory journals related to the field of foot and ankle surgery. After discussion with the authors, it was decided to select three of the higher impact well-known foot and ankle journals to use as a comparison to the predatory journals. The journals that were selected were the Foot and Ankle International journal (AOFAS), Foot and ankle specialist, and the European Foot and ankle specialist (EFAS). Many journal demographics factors (ISSN, peer review process, PubMed indexig, etc) were compared between both types of journals. Results: Of 7 predatory journals, only 2 (28.6%) responded to an online message in regard to the demographics of their journal. Of the journals that responded, none of the journals directly answered all of the questions that were asked. Only 4 of the 7 journals (57%) disclosed their impact factor, and they ranged from 1.508 to 2.52. 2 journals (28.6%) had an editorial board, while one (14%) did not have an editorial board. Information regarding the editorial board was unable to be gathered from 4 journals, as they did not respond to online messages. 4 journals disclosed an article processing fee ranging from $360-$2145. Conclusion: With financial incentives and job promotions being based on research publications, more and more predatory journals are being created to allow authors in the field to publish. However, this rise in predatory journals is detrimental. With a lack of a thorough peer review for some journals, sky-high article processing fees, and hidden peer review processes, these journals are a threat to the next generation of researchers who are not savvy in literature review. We must make a push to have more stringent criteria to critique and index articles.


1994 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
GV Yu ◽  
T Chang ◽  
JM White

The concept of soft tissue attachment and reattachment has been addressed over the years through a variety of surgical techniques. This includes tendons and ligaments that have been detached both surgically and traumatically from their osseous origins or insertions. This study is designed to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of current commercially available devices. Detailed descriptions of the various devices are provided along with a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each. Their application and use in reconstructive foot and ankle surgery are also discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
Prasit Rajbhandari ◽  
Chayanin Angthong ◽  
Jiancheng Zang ◽  
Sihe Qin ◽  
Andrea Veljkovic

Background: Severe equinocavovarus deformity develops from various causes and generally results in major disability that affects patient’s mobility and quality of life. It can be divided into neuromuscular and non-neuromuscular deformities, including two major subtypes: i.e., paralytic and spastic. In addition, ankle osteoarthritis could be caused by prolonged or progressive foot deformity. Objective: The present report proposes a modification of the accepted treatment algorithm and Lambrinudi’s surgical technique with ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis to correct theses challenging deformities with the long-term condition. Results: Two equinocavovarus cases were included, one in a 54-year old male and the second in a 63-year old female with paralaytic and spastic etiologies respectively. Patient’s deformity correction was acceptable. Each patient demonstrated improved outcomes due to a postoperative plantigrade foot and ankle position. No significant complications were encountered during the course of care and last follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 26 months. Conclusion: Severe long term neuromuscular equinocavovarus deformities are a challenging disability in the foot and ankle surgery. The present article proposes a modified guideline of treatment illustrated in two representative case studies of long-term paralytic and spastic equinocavovarus deformities. These conditions can be treated surgically using the stepwise approach as demonstrated in this article with acceptable outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0004
Author(s):  
Jensen K. Henry ◽  
Andrew R. Roney ◽  
Amelia Hummel ◽  
Elizabeth Cody ◽  
Carol A. Mancuso ◽  
...  

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: In foot and ankle surgery, the fulfillment of patients’ preoperative expectations is a unique and validated method to assess postoperative success. Expectation fulfillment is closely associated with postoperative outcomes, satisfaction, and patient-reported improvement. Ideally, foot and ankle patients should have realistic expectations of surgery so that they are appropriately prepared for their postoperative symptoms and function. Inappropriately high expectations may predispose to worse outcomes because patients have unrealistic views about what their surgery can actually accomplish. Conversely, inappropriately low expectations may represent a lack of motivation to improve or participate in rehabilitation and postoperative protocols. This study aimed to identify the relationship between preoperative expectations and postoperative fulfillment. These results may facilitate surgeon-patient communication and help patients prepare for their operation and their postoperative function. Methods: Adult patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery at a single center were prospectively enrolled. Demographics, diagnosis, and outcomes surveys (Short Form [SF]-12, Foot & Ankle Outcome Score, improvement, satisfaction) were collected. Preoperatively, each patient completed the Expectations Survey (range 0-100, with 100 indicating maximum expectations), which asks about anticipated improvement in domains like pain, ambulation, function, and shoewear. Two years after surgery, for each expectation cited preoperatively, patients answered how much improvement they actually achieved. Using a ratio of the postoperative and preoperative scores, a Fulfillment Proportion (FP) was calculated, along with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This permitted identification of patients with unfulfilled, fulfilled, and surpassed expectations. Bivariate correlations, chi-square analyses, and multivariate regressions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to identify the relationship between preoperative expectations, clinical variables, and postoperative expectation fulfillment. Results: There were 271/340 (80%) patients with 2-year follow-up, with mean age 55.4 years and 65% female. Most common diagnoses were hallux valgus (25%), flatfoot (11%), hallux rigidus (11%), ankle arthritis (10%), and chronic tendon injury (9%). Expectation fulfillment differed significantly with extent of preoperative expectations (Figure). Patients with average/high expectations had higher rates of unfulfillment compared to patients with low preoperative expectations (40-41% vs. 22%). Rates of surpassed expectations were highest in patients with low preoperative expectations (23%) compared to average (12%) or high (0%) preoperative expectations (p<.001). In multivariate regression, the greatest predictor of postoperative FP was the preoperative expectations score (p<.001), and lower preoperative expectations conferred a 3.2x (95% CI 1.6-6.2) greater likelihood of more expectations fulfilled (p=.001). Conclusion: Preoperative expectations were a significant predictor of expectation fulfillment after foot and ankle surgery. Lower preoperative expectations were associated with fulfilled or surpassed expectations after surgery, whereas high preoperative expectations were significantly more likely to be unmet. These findings may help guide whether patients’ expectations are realistic or inappropriate preoperatively. It is imperative for surgeons to consider and discuss patients’ expectations prior to surgery to ensure they have an appropriate understanding of their potential outcome. Further research should be directed to the extent that patients’ preoperative expectations can be modified in order to maximize postoperative satisfaction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0020
Author(s):  
Jensen K. Henry ◽  
Andrew Roney ◽  
Amelia Hummel ◽  
Elizabeth Cody ◽  
Scott Ellis

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis, Bunion, Hindfoot, Lesser Toes, Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports, General foot/ankle elective procedures, outcomes Introduction/Purpose: The setting and fulfillment of expectations represent a unique aspect of patient-reported outcomes that is closely associated with satisfaction. Within foot and ankle surgery, patients may expect improvement in pain, mobility, shoe wear, and function in daily life, whether in basic activities or exercise/sports. Within foot and ankle surgery, a 23-item expectation survey has been developed based on patient responses and validated in patients undergoing elective surgery. However, to date, postoperative fulfillment of expectations has not been reported. This study aimed to describe overall rates of expectation fulfillment as well as fulfillment among specific domains. We hypothesized that patients would have the most improvement in pain and ambulation items, with greater rates of unfilled expectations for generalized items like improving confidence and returning to normal. Methods: This is a single-center study of adult patients undergoing elective foot/ankle surgery with 2-year follow-up. Demographic and clinical data were collected along with pre/postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcomes (FAOS) scores. Preoperatively, patients completed the expectations survey, citing the amount of improvement anticipated for each item using Likert-style responses. At 2 years postoperatively, patients repeated the survey, responding with the amount of improvement actually achieved. The total scores for the preoperative and postoperative surveys were used to create a ratio representing the proportion of expectations fulfilled (<1: fulfilled somewhat; 1: fulfilled as expected; >1: expectations surpassed), which was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Responses for each item (pre/postoperatively) were also assessed. Responses of “moderate,” ”a lot,” or “complete” were considered fulfilled, while ”little” or “no” indicated not fulfilled. FAOS scores were compared from baseline to follow-up using paired t-tests. Results: There were 271 patients (mean age 55.4, BMI 27.5, 65% female). Most common diagnoses were hallux valgus (25%), flatfoot (11%), hallux rigidus (11%), ankle arthritis (10%), and chronic tendon injury (9%). Patients had significant improvement in all FAOS domains (P<0.001). Mean proportion of expectations fulfilled was 1.15 (median 1.07, range 0-10), indicating surpassed expectations. Patients averaged complete fulfillment of 9 expectation items. Expectations were surpassed in 56%, met in 4%, and partially or not fulfilled in 41%. Rates of fulfillment were highest for ambulation distance, improving confidence, going back to normal, and preventing foot/ankle problem from getting worse, but did not match the level of expected improvement. Conversely, expectations were surpassed for ability to commute/drive, decreased reliance on pain medication, and participation in social/ activities. Conclusion: Overall, most patients had preoperative expectations that were met or surpassed. Though the proportion of expectations fulfilled exceeded 1, the rates of fulfillment for the most commonly cited items, especially more generalized items, were lower than expected. Improvement in ambulation ability (distance, speed, agility on uneven ground) was also lower than expected. Patients had greater improvement than expected in other functional domains (commute, social and household activities) and pain. These results may help guide appropriate management of expectations both pre and postoperatively. Future studies should assess fulfillment in the setting of specific pathologies and surgeries to better educate patients preoperatively.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0003
Author(s):  
Jensen K. Henry ◽  
Andrew Roney ◽  
Amelia Hummel ◽  
Elizabeth Cody ◽  
Scott Ellis

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis, Arthroscopy, Bunion, Hindfoot, Lesser Toes, Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports, General Foot/Ankle, Outcomes, Satisfaction Introduction/Purpose: Success in orthopaedic surgery was traditionally defined by postoperative radiographs or legacy outcomes scores, but increasingly incorporates more patient-centered metrics. Patient expectations are one such measure, and have been described using a new validated survey for foot/ankle patients. Understanding patients’ expectations of surgery is critical in order to facilitate shared decision-making and set reasonable goals for outcomes. In other specialties, postoperative expectations surveys have also been created and shown to correlate with measures of satisfaction and traditional patient-reported outcomes scores. However, there are no such studies in the foot and ankle literature. This study aimed to validate a method of assessing expectation fulfillment in foot/ankle patients postoperatively. We hypothesized that the survey would significantly correlate with measures of improvement, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes scores. Methods: This is a single-center prospective study of patients undergoing elective foot and ankle procedures. Preoperative demographics, clinical data, and Foot & Ankle Outcomes Score (FAOS) were collected. Patients completed the expectations survey, consisting of 23 questions for domains including pain, ambulation, daily functioning, exercise/sports, shoe wear, and generalized items like “improving confidence in foot/ankle” and ”going back to normal.” Postoperatively, patients answered how much improvement they received for each item listed on the preoperative survey. Using previously validated methods, the proportion of expectations fulfilled was calculated as a ratio of the preoperative to postoperative expectations score, with values of 0 -1 indicating some expectations met, 1 indicating expectations met; and >1 indicating expectations surpassed. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare the expectations survey to other outcomes scales, including FAOS, perceived improvement, overall fulfillment, Delighted-Terrible scale, and satisfaction. Results: 271/340 (80%) of patients with preoperative data completed 2-year follow-up (mean age 55.4 years, mean BMI 27.5, 65% female). Most common diagnoses were hallux valgus (25%), flatfoot (11%), hallux rigidus (11%), and ankle arthritis (10%). Mean proportion of expectations fulfilled was 1.15, indicating surpassed expectations. The proportion of expectations fulfilled correlated best with perceived improvement, global expectation fulfillment, and the Delighted-Terrible scale, and to a lesser degree with satisfaction and change in FAOS (all except activity). Based on the inflection point of the ROC curves corresponding to greatest AUC (Table), a clinically important proportion of expectations fulfilled was 0.81 and correlated with feeling delighted (sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.85), improvement (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.83), overall expectations (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.81), and satisfaction (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.81). Conclusion: The proportion of expectations fulfilled is a valid outcome tool for foot and ankle surgery. It is uniquely able to capture pre- and postoperative data in one value and can be tailored to each patient’s specific goals. This survey can be used by surgeons after a variety of procedures to assess if a patient’s specific expectations have been fulfilled after surgery. We can use this tool to assess which patient and surgical factors may influence the fulfillment of expectations. This, in turn, will help surgeons better indicate the appropriate procedure in the optimal patient to achieve the greatest postoperative success.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Scott Ellis ◽  
Elizabeth Cody ◽  
Jayme Koltsov ◽  
Anca Marinescu ◽  
Carol Mancuso

Category: Patient expectations Introduction/Purpose: Patients’ expectations from orthopaedic surgery may strongly affect postoperative satisfaction and have been shown to relate to many different factors, including age, sex, functional status, and health. However, the diverse diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery may also influence expectations. While pain relief tends to be the predominant expectation of orthopaedic foot and ankle patients, there are certain expectations that may be more important for patients with certain diagnoses. In this study, we aimed to analyze differences in patients’ expectations among the major surgical diagnoses seen in foot and ankle practices. Methods: 352 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery by six orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons were enrolled over eight months. Patients completed the Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey preoperatively, as well as the Foot & Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Short Form (SF)-12, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and pain visual analog scale (VAS). The expectations survey is scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater expectations. Each of its 23 items can also be assessed independently. Differences in expectations scores between diagnoses were analyzed with t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences in the number of expectations and number of expectations with complete improvement expected were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests. Results: Patients with a diagnosis of ankle instability or osteochondral lesion (OCL) had higher expectations scores (p = 0.004) and more often expected complete improvement (p = 0.024) compared to patients with other diagnoses (Table). Patients with hallux valgus had lower expectations scores (p = 0.005) than patients with other diagnoses. Patients with mid- or hindfoot arthritis also had lower expectations scores (p = 0.006) and even more significantly, had an average of only 2.4 expectations with complete improvement expected, while all other patients averaged 8.4 (p < 0.001). Expectations that were relatively unique to specific diagnoses included increased shoe variety for hallux valgus and hallux rigidus, improved appearance for hallux valgus, and improved ability to run for exercise for ankle instability or OCL. Conclusion: Patients’ expectations of foot and ankle surgery vary widely by diagnosis. Higher expectations among patients with ankle instability/OCL may be related to worse functional and mental health status (Table). Lower expectations among patients with hallux valgus and mid- or hindfoot arthritis may be attributable in part to patients’ recognition of the difficulty of treating their condition. Preoperative counseling by their surgeons regarding realistic expectations may also be a factor. We can use the findings of this study to predict what expectations are most important to patients with different diagnoses and to guide how we counsel them prior to surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document