Legal Evaluation of the Design and Current Status of the carbon Emissions Reductions Trading System

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-296
Author(s):  
Yong-Keun Choi
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth DeMarco ◽  
Robert Routliffe ◽  
Heather Landymore

On 17 December 2002, Canada ratified the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Kyoto Protocol), taking on binding targets to reduce Canadian emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Canada's ratification decision and the proposed domestic emissions trading system forming part of Canada's Kyoto implementation plan continue to be the source of considerable disagreement and conflict between the provinces and thefederal government regarding: the practical challenges associated with multiple Canadian jurisdictions implementing emissions trading systems: the current status and legal issues associated with covenants between industry and government(s) to enforce GHG reduction targets; the legal jurisdiction over domestic emissions trading system(s); and the impact on interprovincial and international trade. Each ofthese issues is examined in the unique Canadian legal context. The authors conclude that many ofthe most significant challenges may be mitigated through harmonization and coordination byfederal and provincial governments in a manner that allows for local concerns to be addressed without fragmenting the Canadian emissions markets.


2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 2505-2510
Author(s):  
Qi Wei ◽  
Man Man Tian

Along with the rapid development of economy, China has become the leading emitter of greenhouse gases in the world. Carbon emissions trading system is an important tool and means to response to climate change effectively and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. At present, Chinese carbon trading market is still in its infancy, and there are many deficiencies: legal system is imperfect and carbon source monitoring regulation is lax, the variety of trading is single, China does not have pricing power of carbon emissions and the layouts of trading platform are not reasonable. Through using the implementation experience of the EU emissions trading system, we construct Chinese carbon trading mechanism based on total control principle: voluntary trading market should be carried out fist and mandatory transaction will be implemented when market condition is sufficient. According to the quotas allocation from free to auction, mandatory transaction shall be implemented in there stages.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 6498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuquan Zhao ◽  
Feiqi Liu ◽  
Han Hao ◽  
Zongwei Liu

The Chinese government has made a commitment to control carbon emissions, and the deployment of renewable energy power generation is considered as an effective solution. In recent years, great effort has been exerted to support the development of renewable energy in China. While, due to fiscal pressures and changes in management policies, related subsidies are diminishing now and energy users are asked to pay for the cost. Regulations about carbon cap and renewable energy consumptions are issued to transfer the responsibility of consuming renewable energy and reducing carbon emissions to energy consumers. A national carbon trading system is set up in China and is under its growth stage. Therefore, this study lists the factors that should be considered by the energy users, analyzes the levelized cost of electricity generated by renewable energy in four cities in China, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Wuhan, and compares the results with current carbon prices. Based on the research, under the current status, it is still more cost-efficient for enterprises to buy carbon credits than introduce renewable energies, and great differences among cities are shown due to different natural conditions. Besides, with diminishing subsidies and development of the carbon trading market, the carbon price will gradually reflect the actual value and carbon emission reduction costs will become an important part of enterprise expenditure. In the long term, enterprises should link more factors to carbon emissions, like social responsibility and brand image, instead of only the cost.


2015 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond L. Speth ◽  
Carolina Rojo ◽  
Robert Malina ◽  
Steven R.H. Barrett

Energy Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 28-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Zhongfei Chen

Author(s):  
José Daniel Costa Seijas ◽  
José Manuel Cubela

The main objectives of investment on railway are improving connectivity and access to services; generate employment and amenities; while delivering cuts in carbon emissions, reductions in traffic noise, pollution and congestion. Within that general context, the existing options to improve a railway line are the upgrading of the existing line, which is called the brown field option, or to build a brand new line in the corridor, which is called the green field option and which is assumed a state of art line, i.e. a High Speed Line. There is, nevertheless, a third option that could be followed in which, first the existing line is upgraded and then a new High Speed Line is built in the same corridor. This latter option is acknowledged as economically inefficient, but it is needed to find out to what extend that assertion is true. The purpose of this study is, then, to reach a conclusion on that statement through the analyses of actual cases, i.e. not through a theoretical exercise but through an empirical research. In the first stage of the research two corridors that met the requirements of the study were identified: the Madrid - Valencia Line in Spain and Bordeaux – Spain Line in France. From the analysis of those corridors it was learnt that, indeed, building a new High Speed Line after upgrading the existing line in that corridor will not be economically efficient unless the new line is built after a number of years. That delay could be around 10 years, and will depend on the level of investment carried out for the upgrading and the expected growth of transport demand in the corridor.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/CIT2016.2016.4081 


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 46-59
Author(s):  
Erik BAARK

China recognises the need to reduce carbon emissions in order to avoid negative consequences from climate change in the future. Therefore, the Chinese government initiated seven emissions trading system (ETS) pilots in 2013 and began to develop China’s national ETS in 2017. However, Chinese efforts to implement ETS have encountered legal, institutional and political issues that must be solved so that a national ETS could help to mitigate emissions in China.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document