Cytogenetic effects in peripheral blood lymphocytes in descendants of chernobyl disaster liquidators under the impact of mitomycin c in vitro and folic acid in vivo

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Kovaleva ◽  
N. V. Bagatskaya
1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 618S-618S ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Grazia Cifone ◽  
Edoardo Alesse ◽  
Luisa Di Marzio ◽  
Paola Roncaioli ◽  
Francesca Zazzeroni ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Gajek ◽  
Beata Marciniak ◽  
Jarosław Lewkowski ◽  
Renata Kontek

The incidence of gastrointestinal cancers is increasing every year. Irinotecan (CPT-11), a drug used in the treatment of colorectal cancer and gastric cancer, is metabolized by carboxylesterases to an active metabolite, SN-38, which is more cytotoxic. CAPE (caffeic acid phenethyl ester) is an active component of propolis, which has a high antibacterial, antiviral, and antineoplastic potential. This study analyses the impact of CAPE on the cytotoxic (MTT assay), genotoxic (comet assay) and proapoptotic (caspase-3/7 activity) potential of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 in cultures of gastrointestinal neoplastic cells (HCT116, HT29, AGS). Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity activities of these compounds were carried out in comparison with human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) in vitro. The antioxidant potential of CAPE was investigated in relation H2O2-induced oxidative stress in the both neoplastic cells and PBLs. CAPE expressed cytotoxic, genotoxic, and pro-apoptotic activity against AGS, HCT116, and HT29 tumor cells. CAPE, in the presence of different concentrations of irinotecan or SN38, decreased the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and pro-apoptotic activity in these cell lines, but it has no such action on normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlo Jurica ◽  
Irena Brčić Karačonji ◽  
Vesna Benković ◽  
Nevenka Kopjar

Abstract This study investigated the mechanisms of hydroquinone toxicity and assessed the relationships between its cytotoxic, genotoxic, and cytogenetic effects tested at 8, 140, and 280 μg mL-1 in human peripheral blood lymphocytes exposed for 24 h. The outcomes of the treatments were evaluated using the apoptosis/necrosis assay, the alkaline comet assay, and the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay. The tested hydroquinone concentrations produced relatively weak cytotoxicity in resting lymphocytes, which mostly died via apoptosis. Hydroquinone’s marked genotoxic effects were detected using the alkaline comet assay. Significantly decreased values of all comet parameters compared to controls indicated specific mechanisms of hydroquinone-DNA interactions. Our results suggest that the two higher hydroquinone concentrations possibly led to cross-linking and adduct formation. Increased levels of DNA breakage measured following exposure to the lowest concentration suggested mechanisms related to oxidative stress and inhibition of topoisomerase II. At 8 μg mL-1, hydroquinone did not significantly affect MN formation. At 140 and 280 μg mL-1, it completely blocked lymphocyte division. The two latter concentrations also led to erythrocyte stabilization and prevented their lysis. At least two facts contribute to this study’s relevance: (I) this is the first study that quantifies the degree of reduction in total comet area measured in lymphocyte DNA after hydroquinone treatment, (II) it is also the first one on a lymphocyte model that adopted the “cytome” protocol in an MN assay and found that lymphocytes exposure even to low hydroquinone concentration resulted in a significant increase of nuclear bud frequency. Considering the limitations of the lymphocyte model, which does not possess intrinsic metabolic activation, in order to unequivocally prove the obtained results further studies using other appropriate cell lines are advised.


1997 ◽  
Vol 1997 (45) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto YOSHINO ◽  
Mari TAKIZAWA ◽  
Hiroki OKUMURA ◽  
Tomomi IHARA ◽  
Masao SUGAMATA ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 41 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 1007-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Y. Hostetler ◽  
Jerry Vande Berg ◽  
Kathy A. Aldern ◽  
Gregory T. Brophy

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 624-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darko Grujičić ◽  
Marina Radović ◽  
Slobodan Arsenijević ◽  
Olivera Milošević-Djordjević

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document