On Bilinear Complexity of Multiplying 2 × 2-Matrix by 2 × m-Matrix over Finite Field

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-155
Author(s):  
V. B. Alekseev ◽  
A. A. Nazarov
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Ballet ◽  
Alexis Bonnecaze ◽  
Mila Tukumuli

We indicate a strategy in order to construct bilinear multiplication algorithms of type Chudnovsky in large extensions of any finite field. In particular, using the symmetric version of the generalization of Randriambololona specialized on the elliptic curves, we show that it is possible to construct such algorithms with low bilinear complexity. More precisely, if we only consider the Chudnovsky-type algorithms of type symmetric elliptic, we show that the symmetric bilinear complexity of these algorithms is in [Formula: see text] where n corresponds to the extension degree, and [Formula: see text] is the iterated logarithm. Moreover, we show that the construction of such algorithms can be done in time polynomial in n. Finally, applying this method we present the effective construction, step by step, of such an algorithm of multiplication in the finite field 𝔽357.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-465
Author(s):  
Lu-Ming Shen ◽  
Huiping Jing

Let \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{bbm} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $$\mathbb{F}_q ((X^{ - 1} ))$$ \end{document} denote the formal field of all formal Laurent series x = Σ n=ν∞anX−n in an indeterminate X, with coefficients an lying in a given finite field \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{bbm} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $$\mathbb{F}_q$$ \end{document}. For any \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{bbm} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $$\beta \in \mathbb{F}_q ((X^{ - 1} ))$$ \end{document} with deg β > 1, it is known that for almost all \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{bbm} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $$x \in \mathbb{F}_q ((X^{ - 1} ))$$ \end{document} (with respect to the Haar measure), x is β-normal. In this paper, we show the inverse direction, i.e., for any x, for almost all \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{bbm} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $$\beta \in \mathbb{F}_q ((X^{ - 1} ))$$ \end{document}, x is β-normal.


Author(s):  
G. Suresh Singh ◽  
P. K. Prasobha

Let $K$ be any finite field. For any prime $p$, the $p$-adic valuation map is given by $\psi_{p}:K/\{0\} \to \R^+\bigcup\{0\}$ is given by $\psi_{p}(r) = n$ where $r = p^n \frac{a}{b}$, where $p,a,b$ are relatively prime. The field $K$ together with a valuation is called valued field. Also, any field $K$ has the trivial valuation determined by $\psi{(K)} = \{0,1\}$. Through out the paper K represents $\Z_q$. In this paper, we construct the graph corresponding to the valuation map called the valued field graph, denoted by $VFG_{p}(\Z_{q})$ whose vertex set is $\{v_0,v_1,v_2,\ldots, v_{q-1}\}$ where two vertices $v_i$ and $v_j$ are adjacent if $\psi_{p}(i) = j$ or $\psi_{p}(j) = i$. Here, we tried to characterize the valued field graph in $\Z_q$. Also we analyse various graph theoretical parameters such as diameter, independence number etc.


2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1392-1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Liao ◽  
Fei Chen ◽  
Kwok-wo Wong

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1537-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Lima ◽  
E.A.O. Lima ◽  
F. Madeiro

Author(s):  
Edgar Solomonik ◽  
James Demmel

AbstractIn matrix-vector multiplication, matrix symmetry does not permit a straightforward reduction in computational cost. More generally, in contractions of symmetric tensors, the symmetries are not preserved in the usual algebraic form of contraction algorithms. We introduce an algorithm that reduces the bilinear complexity (number of computed elementwise products) for most types of symmetric tensor contractions. In particular, it lowers the bilinear complexity of symmetrized contractions of symmetric tensors of order {s+v} and {v+t} by a factor of {\frac{(s+t+v)!}{s!t!v!}} to leading order. The algorithm computes a symmetric tensor of bilinear products, then subtracts unwanted parts of its partial sums. Special cases of this algorithm provide improvements to the bilinear complexity of the multiplication of a symmetric matrix and a vector, the symmetrized vector outer product, and the symmetrized product of symmetric matrices. While the algorithm requires more additions for each elementwise product, the total number of operations is in some cases less than classical algorithms, for tensors of any size. We provide a round-off error analysis of the algorithm and demonstrate that the error is not too large in practice. Finally, we provide an optimized implementation for one variant of the symmetry-preserving algorithm, which achieves speedups of up to 4.58\times for a particular tensor contraction, relative to a classical approach that casts the problem as a matrix-matrix multiplication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document