Organic and inorganic fertilization influenced on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 218-223
Author(s):  
Irshad Ahmad ◽  
Bashir Ahmad ◽  
Shahzad Ali ◽  
Han Qing Fang ◽  
Tiening Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Yield And Quality

Saflufenacil Carryover Injury Varies among Rotational Crops

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren E. Robinson ◽  
Kristen E. McNaughton
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Sugar Beet Plant ◽  
Root Weight ◽  
Carrot Root ◽  
Field Corn ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
Weight Yield

Trials were established in 2007, 2008, and 2009 in Ontario, Canada, to determine the effect of soil residues of saflufenacil on growth, yield, and quality of eight rotational crops planted 1 yr after application. In the year of establishment, saflufenacil was applied PRE to field corn at rates of 75, 100, and 200 g ai ha−1. Cabbage, carrot, cucumber, onion, pea, pepper, potato, and sugar beet were planted 1 yr later, maintained weed-free, and plant dry weight, yield, and quality measures of interest to processors for each crop were determined. Reductions in dry weight and yield of all grades of cucumber were determined at both the 100 and 200 g ha−1rates of saflufenacil. Plant dry weight, bulb number, and size and yield of onion were also reduced by saflufenacil at 100 and 200 g ha−1. Sugar beet plant dry weight and yield, but not sucrose content, were decreased by saflufenacil at 100 and 200 g ha−1. Cabbage plant dry weight, head size, and yield; carrot root weight and yield; and pepper dry weight, fruit number and size, and yield were only reduced in those treatments in which twice the field corn rate had been applied to simulate the effect of spray overlap in the previous year. Pea and potato were not negatively impacted by applications of saflufenacil in the year prior to planting. It is recommended that cabbage, carrot, cucumber, onion, pepper, and sugar beet not be planted the year after saflufenacil application at rates up to 200 g ha−1. Pea and potato can be safely planted the year following application of saflufenacil up to rates of 200 g ha−1.

Impact of Nano-Micronutrients as Foliar Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet Roots

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1416-1423
Author(s):  
Mohamed Said Abbas ◽  
Adel Saad El-Ha ◽  
Mohamed Desouki Ha ◽  
Hamdy Abd Elfattah A
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Foliar Fertilization ◽  
Yield And Quality

scholarly journals Effect of soil potassium on yield and quality of diverse sugar beet genotypes

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (No. 9) ◽  
pp. 418-423
Author(s):  
M. Antunović ◽  
D. Rastija ◽  
M. Pospišil
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Potassium Concentration ◽  
Sugar Content ◽  
Root Yield ◽  
Beet Root ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
Sugar Beet Root

Aiming at determination differences in leaf and root potassium concentration of diverse sugar beet genotypes as well as its effect on sugar beet root quality and yield. Investigations comprising 15 sugar beet genotypes (five multigerm lines, five hybrids and five monogerm lines) were carried out on two soil types (Calcic luvisol: L-1 and L-3 and Calcic gleysol: L-2 and L-4) during two growing seasons. Root yield of the investigated genotypes on Calcic luvisol (50 t/ha) was higher, than on Calcic gleysol (34 t/ha). In general, multigerm lines were known for the highest leaf potassium concentration (2.75%), lowest root one (3.78 mmol/100 g root), highest sugar content (13.8%) and best root extractable sugar (1.5%). Monogerm lines had the lowest leaf potassium concentration (2.51%), highest root one (4.24 mmol/100 g root), lowest sugar content (12.9%), and the poorest extractable sugar (10.7%). Root yield of the investigated hybrids (48 t/ha) was higher by 16% compared to multigerm lines yield (42 t/ha) and as much as 35% higher compared to monogerm lines (36 t/ha). Sugar beet root potassium was in significantly negative correlation with sugar content at three localities (L-1: r = –0.485**, L-2: r = –0.096, L-3: r = –0.687**, L-4: r = –0.337**) whereas at all four localities it was in negative correlation with extractable sugar (L-1: r = –0.634**, L-2: r = –0.407**, L-3: r = –0.930**, L-4: r = –0.749**). Potassium concentration in sugar beet leaf was in significant positive correlation with sugar content at three localities (L-1: r = 0.382**, L-2: r = 0.231, L-3: r = 0.717**, L-4: r = 0.516**).

Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa M. Hoffmann ◽  
Toon Huijbregts ◽  
Noud van Swaaij ◽  
Rudolf Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Yield And Quality

scholarly journals Bio-nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Defoliation Increased Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Omar ◽  
O.M.A. Hamed ◽  
M.F.KH.A. Abolela ◽  
M.S. Islam ◽  
A. EL Sabagh
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilization ◽  
Yield And Quality

scholarly journals The Role of Cultivation Systems in Quality Sugar Beet Production

2005 ◽  
pp. 134-138
Author(s):  
Kinga Diána Ungai ◽  
Zoltán Győri
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Production System ◽  
Plant Protection ◽  
Plant Production ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Saccharose Content

Producing sugar beet, as it is a demanding field crop, has contributed to the raising standard of plant production. It has an outstanding place among the plants that are cultivated in the intensive plant production system. Rentability of sugar manufacture is determined by the stability of yield and the quality (saccharose content) of sugar beet. In this way, the fundamental interest both of the producers and the processing industry is high yield and quality, year by year. The yield and the quality of the sugar beet are mainly determined by the plant production system, so we studied the effect of fertilization, irrigation and plant protection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document