scholarly journals Khap Panchayat: Retrieving ‘Honour’ through Violence

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 73-79
Author(s):  
Yamin Khan

As the custodians of honour, Khap Panchayats are self-proclaimed tribunals with full validity and authority among the segments of their caste. These Panchayats are not real courts and do not have a constitutional basis. Under this unconstitutional system, all people of a village huddle around a Chabutara in order to make rapid, unilateral, and incontestable decisions on a variety of problems such as social transgression, marriage, offences, property rights, or situations endangering the village's tranquillity. It is concerning to notice that, in an era where individuals communicate via 3G technology, Indian civilization has regressed to the Dark Age. In today's culture, when legal standards and constitutional authority rule society, organisations like the Khap Panchayat obstruct progress and good government. The residents of the particular territory or community in which 'Khap' exists praise the dictates of Khap Panchayat; this is the most significant hurdle to Khap Panchayat's elimination. This study attempts to answer the question, "Why do Khaps still exist in India?" What is Khap's source of strength? It provides a thorough examination of the problem and attempts to propose a solution.

Author(s):  
Iryna Kuzmych

This article presents a brief, detailed breakdown of the heterogeneity of definitions of biotechnology, as objects of intellectual property, as well as related processes, in international legal acts of the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Community, an attempt has been made to investigate the legal existentiality of biopatents and to characterize the importance of features of the essence of biotechnology, to substantiate the extreme conditionality of the procedure for patenting biotechnology, taking into account this specificity at the stage of creating a national regulatory framework, laid down in the main national regulations. The approaches of international legal acts regarding the consolidation of the principles of protection and protection of intellectual property rights, in particular, and, above all, on biotechnology, as in the a priority scientific, economic and state - strategic sphere, are partially disclosed and the peculiarities of their implementation in national legislation are defined. The warnings about the possible devastating consequences of the current incompetent approach by domestic legislators to the essence of biotechnology as objects of intellectual property, creation of mechanisms of intellectual lawmaking, given their unique ability to self-reproduce and self-reproduce, are pointed out. However, at the same time, it has been noted so far that there have been significant changes in the gradual approximation of legal standards to the standards of the European Community law system, in particular, in ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights in biotechnology, which will have a beneficial effect on the prospect of the emergence of a key innovative legal model with a unified legislative spirals with an understanding of the necessary separation of biotechnologies into an independent legal local intellectual sphere of civilization with an appropriate level of responsibility. The multifaceted nature of the content of biotechnology has turned a science that studies the possibilities of using living organisms, their systems or their vital products to solve technological problems, as well as the possibility of creating living organisms with the necessary properties by genetic engineering, into one of the areas of industry of important macroeconomic importance. In all leading countries of the world, national and international programs on biotechnology, funded by public and private capital, are developed and are operating, in addition, the results of scientific research in the field of biotechnology. Implement long-term projects with a high degree of risk upon receipt of various commercial products, the development results of which must be reliably protected from competitors, possibly while ensuring the granting of exclusive rights to new products and technologies by patenting. Thus, the protection of the right to biotechnology makes the patent an instrument for transferring technology and protecting new markets in the global economy, where the use of such an instrument is most effective in industries with a high cost of research and development, but low production cost of the final product, typical for biotechnological, microbiological and pharmaceutical industry. Convincingly, even in a quote by A. Einstein, «Nature shows us only the tail of the lion. But I do not doubt that the lion belongs to it even though he cannot at once reveal himself because of his enormous size.»24, there are warnings regarding a negligent attitude towards the natural uniqueness of biotechnologies and an understanding of the devastating consequences of an incompetent approach to the interpretation of the concepts and processes associated with biotechnologies when creating a domestic regulatory and legal framework for the protection of intellectual property rights in biotechnologies, the need for biopatents, taking into account the supremacy and legal existence of biotechnologies, as objects of intellectual property and a powerful generator of scientific and technological development ia of the country, the guarantor of innovation and financial stability, and, the innermost unexplored possibilities of biotechnology with unpredictable prospects for humanity.


Author(s):  
Maryna Kovalova

The research intensive companies have been increasingly emphasizing on the commercialization of their innovations to adopt a central strategy for competitive advantage. During last two decades, many small and medium companies have shifted their focus to technological inventions leading to entrepreneurship and simultaneously they are commercializing their new technologies. A well-balanced and accessible intellectual property system plays an important role in this process. Intellectual property rights serve to protect the often large and high-risk investments in innovative companies, thereby providing major incentives to make such investments. Patents and intellectual property are important products of any national innovation system. Innovation is a key driver of economic growth and development in the medium and long term for each country. The concept of innovation can be described as the process of introducing new products, services and production processes to the market and, as a consequence, the creation of new profitable enterprises. A properly created system of protection and protection of intellectual property rights grants exclusive rights to inventors and thus increases their chances of getting the start-up (initial) investments they need to bring new technologies to the market. In other words, intellectual property rights are a key prerequisite for the emergence of intellectual property in the market. Comparison of European legislation with Ukrainian legal standards shows that Ukraine has embarked on a path that is broadly in line with the general global trends in the evolution of legislation in technology transfer. Additional rules that have been successfully applied in European legislation (but are not yet in Ukrainian) can be further integrated into existing legal acts or incorporated into draft new laws, such as the law on the commercialization (transfer) of technologies. The problems that Ukraine will have to solve in the field of technology commercialization in the next few years make it necessary to study the experience of developed countries. Copying is not possible, any innovative measures are successful in the national context: economic, social, legal, etc.


Spatium ◽  
2011 ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenija Petovar ◽  
Vesna Jokic

For obtaining the land in order to build the magistral pipeline a specific form of land expropriation is applied, namely the Right of servitude. The Right of servitude can be realized on the basis of established public interest, which can be defined according to the spatial plan of the relevant area. The Right of servitude is analyzed from the point of its influence on the respect of basic human rights of property owners to enjoy their property in safety and without disturbance. Current legal framework in Serbia that regulates procedures for acquiring land for the purpose of public interest allows for breach of private property rights. There is a mutual inconsistency between a number of decrees that regulate property rights for large infrastructural development projects. A specific, and possibly a greater problem, is the status of the local population, the land owner and other real estate. It concerns their awareness of their private and individual rights, as well as technical and other legal standards, which must be applied during the preparation, construction and working stages of an energy facility. Applying the Right of servitude as a way to acquire land for construction of the Pipeline, there is direct breach of the basic human right as stated in the first Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights, namely that ?every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions? (Article 1, Protocol 1). The Right of servitude allows the investor to use ?public interest? as a way of gaining access to another?s land, and under better financial conditions than if he were to apply permanent expropriation. While the owner retains his/her ownership of the land, inconvenienced by numerous limitations of its use, usability and market value of the land becomes substantially reduced.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Tichá

State or Private Ownership? A Survey of Empirical Studies This paper focuses on property rights and performance of enterprises. The objective of this paper is to summarize existing knowledge from empirical studies dealing with the question of whether private property and privatization of enterprises encourage firms to increase their performance measured as growth of profitability, labor productivity, investments, costs effectiveness, etc. On the basis of empirical studies, it is also determined what the influence of institutional frameworks of property rights and privatization is on the firm performance. The first part of the paper reviews results of studies on the non-transition economies privatized by 1990. The second one evaluates the impact of private ownership on performance of enterprises from transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union. The results of the studies suggest that private ownership is an important but not sufficient determinant of firm prosperity, subsequently resulting in overall rise of wealth of nations. The positive impact of private ownership on economic performance can occur only in an appropriate institutional environment with relevant legal standards (righteous and enforceable contracts, the protection of shareholders and creditors, adequate banking system, functioning bankruptcy courts, capital market supervision, etc.).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Harris ◽  
Meina Cai ◽  
Ilia Murtazashvili ◽  
Jennifer Murtazashvili
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth McChrystal ◽  
Arthur Gutman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document