Psychiatric Issues in the “Loin Pain and Haematuria Syndrome”

1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Kelly

The Loin Pain and Haematuria Syndrome is a relatively new diagnosis applied to the problem of persistent loin pain, often with haematuria, in the absence of identifiable explanatory organic pathology. Case reports have suggested a range of salient psychopathological features associated with the complaints of pain and haematuria, although the psychological factors have been largely neglected in understanding the aetiology or in approaches to management. The roles of illness behaviour, patterns of somatisation, and psychiatric disorder associated with chronic pain syndromes, need to be addressed, as do the patterns of medical and surgical response to these patients. The use of the term “syndrome” to describe these symptoms implies a degree of uniformity in clinical features and outcome that has not yet been substantiated. New surgical techniques have been developed such as renal denervation and renal auto-transplantation to treat the pain, with limited success. A review of this condition illustrates the frequent failure of medicine to apply multi-factorial biopsychosocial models to understanding the aetiology and management of unexplained physical symptoms. It also illustrates the failure of our current nosology and understanding of somatoform disorders to achieve application outside psychiatry.

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1573-1573
Author(s):  
V. Pais ◽  
D. Correia ◽  
F. Ramalho e Silva

BackgroundMedically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) can be defined as physical symptoms that have no currently known physical pathological cause. MUPS account for one in five new consultations in primary care and for one third of new patients when neurology consultations are considered.Patients with MUPS present significant distress and impaired function and their diagnosis is sometimes hard to establish. The classification of somatoform disorders has been found to be insufficiently useful for therapeutic and scientific purposes. Some authors suggest that new classifications should attend to clinical utility, defined as (1) the extent to which a diagnosis can help clinicians understand or conceptualize a disorder in their daily work; (2) the extent to which a diagnosis can help the clinician communicate useful information to others, including practitioners, family members, patients, and administrators; (3) the extent to which the presence of a disorder helps the clinician choose effective interventions, and (4) the extent to which a disorder can predict future clinical management needs.AimThis review aims to discuss the management of MUPS in mental health services, attending to the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.MethodsPubmed Medline search on MUPS and review of recent literature.DiscussionThe management of MUPS implies a multidisciplinary approach that can offer different solutions for different degrees of disorder severity and takes into account the perception of the patient about his own illness. New classifications of somatoform disorders that include comprehensible explanations about these symptoms could be helpful for patients and health professionals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine J. Pohontsch ◽  
Thomas Zimmermann ◽  
Marco Lehmann ◽  
Lisa Rustige ◽  
Katinka Kurz ◽  
...  

Background: General practitioners (GPs) are reluctant to use codes that correspond to somatization syndromes.Aim: To quantify GPs' views on coding of medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), somatoform disorders, and associated factors.Design and Setting: Survey with German GPs.Methods: We developed six survey items [response options “does not apply at all (1)”—“does fully apply (6)”], invited a random sample of 12.004 GPs to participate in the self-administered cross-sectional survey and analysed data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses.Results: Response rate was 15.2% with N = 1,731 valid responses (54.3% female). Participants considered themselves familiar with ICD-10 criteria for somatoform disorders (M = 4.52; SD =.036) and considered adequate coding as essential prerequisite for treatment (M = 5.02; SD = 1.21). All other item means were close to the scale mean: preference for symptom or functional codes (M = 3.40; SD = 1.21), consideration of the possibility of stigmatisation (M = 3.30; SD = 1.35) and other disadvantages (M = 3.28; SD = 1.30) and coding only if psychotherapy is intended (M = 3.39; SD = 1.46). Exposure, guideline knowledge, and experience were most strongly associated with GPs' self-reported coding behaviour.Conclusions: Subjective exposure, guideline knowledge, and experience as a GP, but no sociodemographic variable being associated with GPs' subjective coding behaviour could indicate that GPs offer a relatively homogeneous approach to coding and handling of MUPS and somatoform disorders. Strengthening guideline knowledge and implementation, and practise with simulated patients could increase the subjective competence to cope with the challenge that patients with MUPS and somatoform disorders present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document