Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone in intrauterine death: A retrospective study

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Fletcher ◽  
G. Wharfe ◽  
D. Simeon ◽  
S. Mitchell ◽  
D. Brown
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Peng ◽  
Ruobing Li ◽  
Shuguo Du ◽  
Heng Yin ◽  
Min Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using a double-balloon catheter (DBC) within 12 h versus within 12–24 h. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 58 pregnant women at 14 + 0 weeks to 27 + 6 weeks of gestation were enrolled as research subjects, and they underwent the intended termination of pregnancy at our birth centre from January 1, 2017, to June 31, 2019. Based on the duration of DBC, the patients were divided into two groups, namely, the DBC group within 12 h and the DBC group within 12–24 h. Results All 58 cases were successful vaginal deliveries, and no one chose to undergo caesarean section. The success rate of induction (successful abortion of the foetus and placenta without the implementation of dilation and evacuation) was higher in the DBC group within 12–24 h (96.3%, 29/31) than in the DBC group within 12 h (71.0%, 18/27) (p < 0.05). Additionally, the time from DBC removal to delivery in the DBC group within 12–24 h was significantly shorter than that in the DBC group within 12 h (3.0 h versus 17.8 h) (p < 0.05), and the degree of cervical dilation after DBC removal in the DBC group within 12–24 h was larger than that in the DBC group within 12 h (p < 0.05). Conclusion In the clinic, the placement time of DBC generally lasts for approximately 12 h. However, considering that the cervical condition is immature in the mid-trimester, properly extending the placement time of DBC to 24 h will benefit cervical ripening and reduce the chance of dilation and evacuation.


Author(s):  
Hemalatha K. R. ◽  
Qutejatul Kubra Mulla

Background: Intrauterine fetal death is most undesirable consequence of pregnancy and stressful condition for women and family and for health professional. Naturally, majority of women (over 90%) go in for spontaneous labour and deliver within 3 weeks of intrauterine death. Prolonged retention of dead fetus in utero has complications like DIC, psychological stress and infection. Various methods are available to induce labor in intrauterine fetal death. One such regimen is medical management using a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of combination of mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol only in induction of labour in late intrauterine fetal death.Methods: A prospective study was carried out in KIMS, Hubli between Jan 2014 to Dec 2015.Data from 100 women with intrauterine fetal death between gestational age of 24-42 weeks were analysed. They were divided into 2 groups of 50 each. Group I received single oral dose of 200mg mifepristone followed 24 hours later with oral misoprostol (100µg-50µg) every 4 hourly. Group II received only misoprostol. Outcomes were measured in terms of induction to delivery interval and number of misoprostol doses required.Results: Mean induction to delivery interval in Group I was 8.3 hours versus13.4 hours in Group II. Induction delivery interval was shorter in combined regimen. Total dose of misoprostol was also less in Group I.Conclusions: Both regimens are safe for induction of labour in late intrauterine fetal death. However, the induction delivery interval and dose of misoprostol required was decreased in combination regimen.


Author(s):  
Patricia Yudkin ◽  
A. M. Frumar ◽  
Anne B. M. Anderson ◽  
A. C. Turnbull

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu Xiao Li

Labour induced in 46 women with a small balloon catheter was compared to 46 women induced with ‘normal balloon’ (Robinson's catheter with two condoms) and matched for age, parity, gestational age, marital status and ethnic origin with the aim of identifying a preferred induction method for middle trimester pregnancy. The retrospective study showed no differences in the duration of delivery, Pitocin, mode delivery, complications and effective rate. ‘Small balloon’ is simpler than ‘normal balloon’ and is a safe, reliable induction of labour method for mid-trimester pregnancy.


Author(s):  
Fauziah Jummaat ◽  
Shuhaila Ahmad ◽  
Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail

Abstract Background Amniocentesis is a well-known invasive procedure which is commonly carried out in the second trimester. The indication for amniocentesis varies throughout countries and centers. Despite providing significant prenatal diagnosis; many maternal and fetal complications have been reported from previous studies. Materials and methods This retrospective study aimed to determine the maternal and fetal complications following amniocentesis. This study involved all patients who underwent amniocentesis from January 2012 until June 2017 in a tertiary centre. Maternal age, parity, premorbid medical conditions, amniocentesis indications, gestational age during amniocentesis, karyotyping results, complications during and post procedure and the fetal outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. Results One hundred and fourteen patients’ medical records were reviewed and the majority of patients (50.9%) ranged in age from age 30 to 39 years old with mean age of 34.29 years. Amniocentesis was performed during the second trimester in the majority of patients (71.1%). The indications for amniocentesis in this study were polyhydramnios (7.9%), advanced maternal age (9.6%), risk of Down’s syndrome (31.6%), increased risk of Patau syndrome (6.1%), increased risk of Edward’s syndrome (4.4%) and abnormal fetal ultrasonography (70.2%). Cytogenetics results of amniocentesis were normal in 82 patients (71.9%). The majority of patients (86.0%) had no complications. Two patients (12.5%) had intrauterine death presumed to be procedural related. Conclusion This 5-year retrospective study on amniocentesis procedure showed that the majority of amniocentesis were safe as 86.0% of the patients were free from any complications. Anticipating its complication is important as there is always a risk even though it is a safe procedure in general.


1980 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
Patricia Yudkin ◽  
A. M. Frumar ◽  
Anne B. M. Anderson ◽  
A. C. Turnbull

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document