scholarly journals Ultra Low Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Disc Disease

1989 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-352
Author(s):  
M. K. J. Fagerlund ◽  
L. Ekelund
1990 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Collins ◽  
J.P. Stack ◽  
D.J. O'Connell ◽  
M. Walsh ◽  
F.P. Mcmanus ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Michael ◽  
Ivan S. Ciric ◽  
James C. Kudrna ◽  
Walid A. Hindo

1989 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. J. Fagerlund ◽  
L. Ekelund

Magnetic resonance (MR) examination of the lumbar spine was performed in 51 patients using a resistive magnet with a field strength of 0.02 T. The results at 105 intervertebral levels were compared with those of computed tomography (CT). Due to the extremely low field strength, an unfavourable signal-to-noise ratio degraded the image quality. Some improvement was achieved with the development of a dedicated surface coil. The diagnostic information was not comparable with that obtained with CT, nor was the image quality comparable to that obtained at higher field strengths. Compared with CT there was no false information. Therefore, it is suggested that extremely low field units may permit exclusion of pathology on the basis of a normal examination and in this way help in the selection of those patients who need further investigation and treatment.


Spine ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (supplement) ◽  
pp. 443-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Albeck ◽  
Jørgen Hilden ◽  
Lasse Kjar ◽  
Stig Holtås ◽  
Johannes Præstholm ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Ley ◽  
Kerstin Hansson ◽  
Lennart Sjöström ◽  
Martin Rapp

SummaryObjectives: To describe postoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) treated by dorsal laminectomy and partial discectomy.Methods: Prospective clinical case study of dogs diagnosed with and treated for DLSS. Surgical and clinical findings were described. Computed tomography and low field MRI findings pre- and postoperatively were described and graded. Clinical, CT and MRI examinations were performed four to 18 months after surgery.Results: Eleven of 13 dogs were clinically improved and two dogs had unchanged clinical status postoperatively despite imaging signs of neural compression. Vacuum phenomenon, spondylosis, sclerosis of the seventh lumbar (L7) and first sacral (S1) vertebrae endplates and lumbosacral intervertebral joint osteoarthritis became more frequent in postoperative CT images. Postoperative MRI showed mild disc extrusions in five cases, and in all cases contrast enhancing non-discal tissue was present. All cases showed contrast enhancement of the L7 spinal nerves both pre- and postoperatively and seven had contrast enhancement of the lumbosacral intervertebral joints and paraspinal tissue postoperatively. Articular process fractures or fissures were noted in four dogs.Clinical significance: The study indicates that imaging signs of neural compression are common after DLSS surgery, even in dogs that have clinical improvement. Contrast enhancement of spinal nerves and soft tissues around the region of disc herniation is common both pre- and postoperatively and thus are unreliable criteria for identifying complications of the DLSS surgery.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-06-0096


2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1474-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille E. Noel ◽  
Parag J. Parikh ◽  
Christopher R. Spencer ◽  
Olga L. Green ◽  
Yanle Hu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narayan Bikram Thapa ◽  
Suraj Bajracharya

 Introduction: Low backache is commonly experienced by adults at some time during their lives. Though it is caused by degenerative changes, spinal stenosis, neoplasm, infection and trauma, lumbar disc degeneration is the most commonly diagnosed abnormalities associated. As Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is non invasive imaging technique with excellent spatial and contrast resolution, it has become the investigation of choice in evaluation of patients with low back pain. This study was designed to determine the patterns of degenerative disc disease on MRI in patients with low backache.Methods: A retrospective hospital based study was done by reviewing MRI report of 202 patients who underwent MRI of lumbar spine for complaint of chronic low back pain, radicular pain, neurogenic claudication or various other symptoms and signs suggestive of lumbar degenerative disc disease from January 2014 till June 2014. The patients having MRI findings of acute spinal infection, recent trauma, tumors, spinal dysraphism and metabolic conditions were excluded from the study.Results: Out of the 202 patients included in the study, 116 patients (57.4%) were male and 86 patients (42.6%) were female. The mean age of the study population was 44.26 ±15.61 (13-83) years. Multiple contiguous level disc disease was the most common type of involvement which was noted in 109 (54%) patients. Grade 4 lumbar disc degeneration (graded as per classification given by Pfirrmann et al) was noted in 65.3% (132) cases followed by Grade 2 in 25.2%(51) cases and Grade 1in 5.5% (11) cases. The most common involvement was observed at L4-L5 level (76.7%) and L5-S1 levels (55.9%) followed by L3-L4 (30.6%) in decreasing order of frequency. The most common category was disc bulge note in 46.5% (94) of cases. Nerve root compression was observed in 56% (114) of the total cases. Nerve root compromise was also noted most frequently compressing L5 nerve (28.23% of cases). Annular tear was observed in 14.4% (29) of cases and among them 20% (6) of cases had torn at two intervertebral discs. It is most frequently noted involving L4-L5 intervertebral disc (72.5% of cases), followed by L5-S1 (24.2% of cases).Conclusion: Disc generation is most common at L4-L5 level with multiple contiguous involvement of grade 4. Annular tear though not common can occur and is also common at L4-L5 level.Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal, 2015; 18 (2)                        


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document