Survival of cervical cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century: A period analysis by age, histology, and stage

2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 915-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianhui Chen ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Adam Gondos ◽  
Katharina Emrich ◽  
Bernd Holleczek ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 906-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Hiripi ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Adam Gondos ◽  
Katharina Emrich ◽  
Bernd Holleczek ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianhui Chen ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Adam Gondos ◽  
Katharina Emrich ◽  
Bernd Holleczek ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4767-4767
Author(s):  
Dianne Pulte ◽  
Janick Weberpals ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Alexander Katalinic ◽  
Alice Nennecke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Population level survival has improved for myeloma in the early 21st century, but it is unknown whether a similar improvement has occurred in other plasma cell or lymphoplasmacytoid conditions. Methods: Data were extracted from 12 population-based cancer registries in Germany and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the United States (US). Cases of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and plasmacytoma diagnosed in 1998-2012 were included. Myeloma survival was analyzed for comparison. Plasma cell leukemia was not included due to case numbers being too small to produce reliable estimates. Period analysis was used to determine 5-year relative survival for patients with the above malignancies in 2003-12. Trends in survival in the early 21st century were analyzed using modeled period analysis, comparing survival for 2003-07 to 2008-12. Results: In Germany, 5-year age adjusted relative survival in 2003-12 was 72.1% overall and 56.5% for patients with plasmacytoma, 74.9% for LPL not otherwise specified and 80.8% for WM. In the US, survival was higher overall at 75.1%, with survival for individual entities of 81.9% for WM, 77.2% for LPL, and 62.3% for plasmacytoma. Five year relative survival estimates for myeloma in 2003-12 were 45.2% and 43.1% in Germany and the US, respectively. Trend analysis for the years 2003-07 and 2008-12 revealed an increase in survival overall in Germany and the US, with survival for all malignancies going from 69.2% to 74.2% in Germany and 73.3% to 76.8% in the US (see table). A small, borderline significant increase in survival was observed for WM in Germany, with survival going from 74.8% to 84.3% (p=0.05) and a significant increase was observed for LPL, going from 71.7% to 77.4% (p=0.01). A pattern of small increases in survival was observed for plasmacytoma in Germany and each individual malignancy in the US. A strong and significant increase was observed in both countries for myeloma, with 5-year survival going from 41.4% to 47.9% in Germany and 38.8% to 47.0% in the US (p<0.0001 for both). Conclusions: Five year survival for patients with plasma cell and plasmacytoid conditions other than myeloma varies depending on the morphology. Some evidence of increased survival was observed in rare plasma cell and plasmacytoid malignancies, but small case numbers make determination of statistical significance difficult and magnitude of the differences are less than for myeloma in most cases, with the exceptions of WM in Germany. Increased research focusing specifically on rare plasma cell malignancies and implementation of findings into cancer care may improve survival further. Table Trends in 5-year relative survival for 2003-07 to 2008-12 for rare plasma cell and plasmacytoid malignancies, with comparison to myeloma. Table. Trends in 5-year relative survival for 2003-07 to 2008-12 for rare plasma cell and plasmacytoid malignancies, with comparison to myeloma. Disclosures Pulte: EBSCO: Other: Review of content for Dynamed medical reference product; Selexys Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ApoPharma: Research Funding.


Linguistics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1543-1579
Author(s):  
Paula Rodríguez-Abruñeiras

AbstractThis article discusses the diachronic development of the Spanish multifunctional formula en plan (with its variant en plan de, literally ‘in plan (of)’ but usually equivalent to English like). The article has two main aims: firstly, to describe the changes that the formula has undergone since its earliest occurrences as a marker in the nineteenth century up to the early 21st century. The diachronic study evinces a process of grammaticalization in three steps: from noun to clause adverbial and then to discourse marker. Secondly, to conduct a contrastive analysis between en plan (de) and the English markers like and kind of/kinda so as to shed new light on the potential existence of a universal pathway of grammaticalization in the emergence of discourse markers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document