scholarly journals Prospective Study of Plasma Homocysteine Level and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Women

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Christen ◽  
Nancy R. Cook ◽  
Paul M. Ridker ◽  
Julie E. Buring
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sourav Ghosh ◽  
M Saha ◽  
D Das

Introduction: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) related to adverse vascular changes is the most frequent cause of irreversible visual impairment in the elderly. Elevated plasma concentrations of serum homocysteine have been shown to increase the risk of vascular disease. Objective: To assess the relationship between plasma homocysteine level and age related macular degeneration. Materials and methods: A case control study was conducted in a tertiary eye care hospital with 32 diagnosed AMD patients. The patients were compared for plasma homocysteine levels with a control group of 32 patients without AMD. A 1.5 ml of fasting venous blood sample was obtained from each participant. Plasma homocysteine level was measured by high performance liquid chromatography. The main outcome measure was hyperhomocysteinemia, defined as a plasma homocysteine level above 15 μmol/l. Results: Hyperhomocysteinemia was found in 10 blood samples (83.3 %) of patients in the wet AMD group, in 16 (80 %) blood samples in the dry AMD group, and in 12 blood samples (37%) of controls. The mean ± SD homocysteine level in the AMD group was 16.86 ± 3.52 μmol/L, while in the non-AMD control group it was 14.53 ± 4.08 μmol/L. This difference was statistically significant (p-value = 0.0186). In the individual analysis, it was also found out that the homocysteine level differed significantly between cases and controls in only the wet variety of AMD. Conclusion: Hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly associated with the wet AMD variety but not with the dry AMD. Thus, homocysteine by oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction can be an important risk factor in the pathogenesis of AMD. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2013; 5(10): 195-200 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v5i2.8728


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Christen ◽  
Nancy R. Cook ◽  
Stephanie E. Chiuve ◽  
Paul M. Ridker ◽  
J. Michael Gaziano

2021 ◽  
pp. 247412642199705
Author(s):  
Halward M.J. Blegen ◽  
Samuel D. Hobbs ◽  
Reggie Taylor ◽  
Andrew L. Plaster ◽  
Paul M. Drayna

Purpose: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is useful in diagnosing and monitoring retinal pathology such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema (DME), central serous chorioretinopathy, and epiretinal membrane, among others. This study compared the ability of horizontal (H) 25-, 13-, and 7-cut macular OCT vs 24-, 12-, and 6-cut radial (R) macular OCT in identifying various macular pathology. Methods: This was a prospective study of 161 established patients evaluated at Wilford Hall Eye Center Retina Clinic between September and October of 2019. Pathology included age-related macular degeneration, central serous chorioretinopathy, DME, and epiretinal membrane, among others. Patients obtained 25-, 13-, and 7-cut H raster OCT as well as 24-, 12-, and 6-cut R OCT. Primary outcomes were sensitivity in detecting macular fluid and each macular abnormality. Results: The 24-cut radial (R24) OCT equally or out-performed the H25 (horizontal 25-cut OCT) in detecting macular fluid across all pathological groups. Generally, a higher number of cuts correlated with better detection of fluid. In detecting any macular abnormalities, H25, R24, and R12 had 100% sensitivity. R6 OCT had near 100% sensitivity across all groups, except for DME (95%). Overall, R OCT had better sensitivity (0.960) than H OCT (0.907) in detecting macular pathology. Conclusions: R outperformed H macular OCT in detecting fluid and other abnormalities. Clinically, both scanning patterns can be used by ophthalmologists in diagnosis and management of commonly encountered macular diseases. Technicians may be able to use a variety of these scans to screen for pathology prior to physician evaluation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umed A Ajani ◽  
William G Christen ◽  
Joann E Manson ◽  
Robert J Glynn ◽  
Debra Schaumberg ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-256.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad F. Bashshur ◽  
Zeina A. Haddad ◽  
Alexandre Schakal ◽  
Rola F. Jaafar ◽  
Marc Saab ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raimondo Forte ◽  
Lucia Panzella ◽  
Ida Cesarano ◽  
Gilda Cennamo ◽  
Thomas Eidenberger ◽  
...  

Eye ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Coral ◽  
R Raman ◽  
S Rathi ◽  
M Rajesh ◽  
K N Sulochana ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document