Absolute monocyte count is a prognostic indicator in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongnan Mo ◽  
Yuankai Shi ◽  
Xiaohong Han ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Jianliang Yang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7571-TPS7571
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Christopher A. Yasenchak ◽  
Khaleel K. Ashraf ◽  
William N. Harwin ◽  
Robert Brownell Sims ◽  
...  

TPS7571 Background: The majority of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse after HSCT, or who are not candidates for HSCT have poor outcomes and are in need of novel therapies. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a CD30-directed ADC and preclinical data provide a strong rationale for combining BV, lenalidomide, and rituximab in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. In addition, in a phase 1 trial in which 37 pts with R/R DLBCL were treated with BV + lenalidomide, the ORR was 56.7% (73.3% in CD30+ pts; manuscript in preparation). The median duration of remission was 13.2 months in pts with a CR or PR and 11.7 months in pts with CR, PR, or stable disease > 6 months. The PFS and median OS were 11.2 months and 14.3 months, respectively and results were similar in the CD30+ and CD30 < 1% groups. The clinical activity and manageable safety profiles of BV, lenalidomide, and rituximab as single agents, make the combination a viable option in multiply relapsed and heavily pretreated pts. Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, multicenter phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of BV vs placebo, in combination with lenalidomide + rituximab, in subjects with R/R DLBCL (NCT04404283). Prior to randomization, there will be a safety and PK run-in period where 6 pts will receive BV, lenalidomide + rituximab, and safety and PK will be evaluated after the first cycle of treatment; 6/6 subjects have been enrolled. Key eligibility criteria include: pts aged ≥18 with R/R DLBCL with an eligible subtype; ≥2 prior lines of therapy and must be ineligible for, or have declined, stem cell transplant, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy; ECOG 0 to 2; fluorodeoxyglucose-avid disease by PET and bidimensional measurable disease of at least 1.5 cm by CT. Patients (n = 400) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either BV or placebo in combination with lenalidomide + rituximab and will be stratified by CD30 expression (positive [ ≥1%] versus < 1%), prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant therapy (received or not), prior CAR-T therapy (received or not), and cell of origin (GCB or non-GCB). The primary endpoints are PFS per BICR in the ITT and CD30+ populations. Key secondary endpoints are OS in the ITT and CD30+ populations, and ORR per BICR. Other secondary endpoints include CR rate, duration of response, and safety and tolerability of the combination. Disease response will be assessed by BICR and the investigator according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System. Radiographic disease evaluations, including contrast-enhanced CT scans and PET, will be assessed at baseline, then every 6 weeks from randomization until Week 48, then every 12 weeks. PET is not required after CR is achieved. The trial is currently enrolling and will be open in 16 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT04404283.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4902-4902
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Mirault ◽  
Arash Ghanbari Milani ◽  
Ditina Ghetia ◽  
Isaac Yeboah ◽  
Puja Sharma ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4902 Introduction: Of the various subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most prevalent, making up 30 percent of all non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases. Information from community hospitals regarding the treatment and survival of relapsed patients is scarce. The study was done to obtain the survival data of patients with a relapse of DLBCL, treated with and without transplant at our center. Patients and Methods: The tumor registry data at Jersey Shore University Medical Center between 2000–2008 was reviewed. 41 patients had been diagnosed with DLBCL. Of these, the diagnosis in 13 pts represented a relapse of DLBCL. Review of the hospital records showed that the treatments for these relapsed patients had been radiation, rituximab -based chemotherapy, and/or autologous stem cell transplant. Eight were female and five were male, with a median age of 66 years at initial diagnosis (range: 51 to 81 years). The median age was 68 at the time of relapse (range: 52 to 82 years). Survival was measured from the time of the diagnosis of relapse until death from any cause or the date when lost to follow up. Information on the duration of time from initial diagnosis to relapse was also obtained. Results: Of the 13 patients who relapsed, 3 underwent stem cell transplant, one of whom died at 43 weeks and two are alive after 70 and 336 weeks. Of the 10 who did not have transplant, 6 died at 2, 8, 15, 19, 19 and 38 weeks. The 4 remaining non-transplant patients are alive at 37, 61, 167, and 221 weeks. Of the 13 patients who relapsed, at primary diagnosis, one had been stage I, 3 had been stage II, 3 had been stage III, and 5 had been stage IV. One was of unknown stage. The average time from diagnosis to relapse was 80 weeks. Conclusion: Although our numbers are small, it does appear that there is a role for second-line treatments in those patients with a relapse of large cell lymphoma that are not undergoing stem cell transplant. Further study of the treatment of non-transplanted patients with relapsed DLBCL appears warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. e59-e60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seah H. Lim ◽  
Joseph M. Guileyardo ◽  
Robbie Graham ◽  
Lorna R. Strong ◽  
William V. Esler

Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. e174-e177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamzah Araf ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Margaret Ashton-Key ◽  
Koorosh Korfi ◽  
Doriana Di Bella ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7522-7522
Author(s):  
Aung M. Tun ◽  
Seth Maliske ◽  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
Ivana N. M. Micallef ◽  
...  

7522 Background: Patients with newly diagnoseddiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24) following immunochemotherapy (IC) have excellent overall survival (OS) similar to that of age- and sex-matched general population. The standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) DLBCL following frontline IC is salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The goal of this study is to evaluate the role of progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months (PFS24) as a landmark after ASCT in patients with RR DLBCL. Methods: Patients with RR DLBCL after frontline R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like IC who underwent salvage therapy and ASCT at Mayo Clinic or University of Iowa between 07/2000 and 4/2020 were identified from institutional lymphoma transplant databases. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Post-ASCT PFS, OS, and post-relapse survival (PRS) were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method, and cumulative incidences of relapse vs non-relapse mortality (NRM) and different causes of death were compared accounting for competing events. Statistical analyses were performed in EZR v1.54. Results: A total of 437 patients were identified. Median age at ASCT was 61 years (range 19-78), and 280 (64%) were male. After a median post-ASCT follow up of 8.0 years (95% CI 7.2-8.7), 215 patients had a relapse (or disease progression), 180 within 2 years and 35 after 2 years. For the entire cohort, post-ASCT relapse rate was much higher than NRM rate (48.1 vs 9.1% at 5-year). Median PFS and OS after ASCT was 2.7 and 5.4 years, respectively. Lymphoma was the primary cause of death after ASCT. In contrast, for patients who had achieved PFS24 (n = 220), rates of post-PFS24 relapse and NRM were similar (14.8% and 12.3% at 5-year). Median PFS and OS after achieving PFS24 was 10.0 and 11.5 years, respectively. Lymphoma related and unrelated death rates were similar after achieving PFS24 (Table). For all patients who had a post-ASCT relapse, median PRS was 0.7 years (95% CI 0.5-0.9), and late relapse ( > 2 vs ≤2 years after ASCT) was associated with better PRS (median 2.3 [1.7-4.8] vs 0.5 [0.3-0.7] years, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Post-ASCT PFS24 is an important prognostic predictor of post-ASCT outcomes in patients with RR DLBCL following frontline IC.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document