Party and Play in the Closet? Exploring Club Drug Use Among Swedish Men Who Have Sex With Men

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 1093-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frida J. M. Petersson ◽  
Ronny Tikkanen ◽  
Axel J. Schmidt
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1347-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Isabel Fernández ◽  
G. Stephen Bowen ◽  
Leah M. Varga ◽  
Jose B. Collazo ◽  
Nilda Hernandez ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1317-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Clatts ◽  
Lloyd A. Goldsamt ◽  
Huso Yi

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1723-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele D. Kipke ◽  
George Weiss ◽  
Marizen Ramirez ◽  
Fred Dorey ◽  
Anamara Ritt-Olson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Morgenstern ◽  
Donald A. Bux ◽  
Jeffrey Parsons ◽  
Brett T. Hagman ◽  
Milton Wainberg ◽  
...  

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
DOUG BRUNK

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Parsons ◽  
Christian Grov ◽  
Brian C. Kelly

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Merrill Singer
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. John ◽  
K. Marie Sizemore ◽  
Ruben H. Jimenez ◽  
S. Scott Jones ◽  
Andrew E. Petroll ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND HIV disproportionately affects sexual minority men (SMM) in the U.S. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine past HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) use and current pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among an online sample of cisgender and transgender men who have sex with men. METHODS In 2019, HIV-negative and unknown status SMM (n=63,015) were recruited via geosocial networking apps, social media, and other online venues to participate in a brief eligibility screening survey. Individuals were asked about past PEP and current PrEP use. We examined associations of demographics, socioeconomic indicators, recent club drug use, and current PrEP use on past PEP use using fully-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS Prior PEP use was relatively uncommon (11.3%), with 2.66 times more men reporting current PrEP use (30.1%). Most (85.9%) past PEP users were current PrEP users, representing 32.2% of all current PrEP users. In multivariable analysis, current PrEP users had 20.1 times higher odds (95%CI: 18.6-21.6) of past PEP use compared to non-PrEP users. Other factors significantly (p<0.001) associated with past PEP use but with smaller effect sizes included: older age (>24 years old) compared to younger age (AOR=1.15); bisexual identity compared to gay (AOR=0.86); Latino, Black, and other/multiracial race/ethnicity compared to white, individually (AORs=1.37-1.52); having health insurance (AOR=0.80); and recent club drug use (AOR=1.19). CONCLUSIONS Prior PEP use was relatively uncommon in our online sample of SMM, but our findings indicate PEP could potentially be a gateway to PrEP. Advertising and prescribing PEP could support efforts to increase PrEP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document