A role of the FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis between elderly onset rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica; Comment on the study by Dr. Takahashi et al.

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 804-804
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Oiwa
Author(s):  
Ciro Manzo ◽  
Alberto Castagna

Background: Differential diagnosis between polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and seronegative elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (SEORA) is not easy, to the point that in the past they were considered the same entity. In these patients, sleep disorders have been scarcely assessed, and considered as expression of mood disorders such as depression and anxiety. Methods: In 38 Caucasian elderly patients (median age: 73.9 ± 8.06 years) consecutively referred to two outpatient clinics from January to May 2018 with diagnosis of PMR and SEORA, sleep impairment was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep scale (MOS-SS). Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) score, with point 0 for absent and point 3 for severe. Comorbidities were assessed using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS).  Patients taking medications used to treat sleep disturbance or that could favor sleep disturbances were excluded.  The study was approved by the local ethics committee and carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, revised 2013. Every patient signed an informed consent form at the time of the first visit. Results: MOS-SS total point in PMR patients was significantly higher than in SEORA patients (47.60 ± 8.4 vs 28.26 ± 12.4; P = 0.000). After six-month therapy with prednisone (12.5–15 mg/day, followed after 4 weeks by gradual tapering), MOS-SS total point improved in the two groups of patients, with no significant difference (17.0 ± 6.2 vs 17.8 ± 4.2; P = 0.644). No correlation was found between MOS-SS and comorbidities, and between MOS-SS, anxiety or depression. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the assessment of sleep impairment could be very useful in the differential diagnosis between PMR and SEORA. Up today, the reasons why patients with PMR have—at the time of diagnosis—a sleep impairment higher than SEORA are speculative. Further ad hoc complementary studies in multicenter cohorts are needed.


Author(s):  
U. Elboga ◽  
M. Yılmaz ◽  
M. Uyar ◽  
Y. Zeki Çelen ◽  
K. Bakır ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheol Won Hyeon ◽  
Hyun Kyung Yi ◽  
Eun Kyoung Kim ◽  
Sung-Ji Park ◽  
Sang-Chol Lee ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aimed to assess the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of pericardial disease. The diagnosis is often troublesome because pericardial fluid analysis or biopsy does not always provide answers. 18FDG-PET/CT can visualize both inflammation and malignancy and offers a whole-body assessment. Patients who visited the Pericardial Disease Clinic of Samsung Medical Center with an 18FDG-PET/CT order code were extracted. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the purpose of the differential diagnosis was not pericardial disease; (2) the patient had a known advanced-stage malignancy; (3) the patient already have confirmative diagnosis using a serology, pericardial effusion analysis or biopsy. The analysis included 107 patients. The most common final diagnosis was idiopathic (n = 46, 43.0%), followed by tuberculosis (n = 30, 28.0%) and neoplastic (n = 11, 10.3%). A maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 5 typically indicates tuberculosis or neoplastic pericarditis except in just one case of autoimmune pericarditis); especially all of the SUVmax scores ≥ 10 had tuberculosis. The diagnostic yield of pericardial biopsy was very low (10.2%). Interestingly, all of the pericardium with an SUVmax < 4.4 had nondiagnostic results. In contrast, targeted biopsies based on 18FDG uptake demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield (38.7%) than pericardium. The sensitivity of 18FDG-PET/CT was 63.6%. The specificity was 71.9%. The positive predictive value was 20.6%. The negative predictive value 94.5%, and the accuracy was 71.0% for excluding malignancy based upon the FDG uptake patterns. It is possible to explore the differential diagnosis in some patients with difficult pericardiocentesis or pericardial biopsy in a noninvasive manner using on the SUVmax or uptake patterns. In addition, the biopsy strategy depending on 18FDG uptake is helpful to achieve biopsy more safely and with a higher yield. 18FDG-PET may enhance the diagnostic efficacy in patients with pericardial disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2013-2018
Author(s):  
Guangyu Ma ◽  
Xiaojun Zhang ◽  
Minshu Wang ◽  
Xiaodan Xu ◽  
Baixuan Xu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinae Lee ◽  
Taegyu Park ◽  
Soyeon Park ◽  
Kisoo Pahk ◽  
Seunghong Rhee ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Elboga ◽  
M. Yılmaz ◽  
M. Uyar ◽  
Y. Zeki Çelen ◽  
K. Bakır ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document