scholarly journals Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Holden ◽  
Ruth M. Reeder ◽  
Jill B. Firszt ◽  
Charles C. Finley
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Implant System

Effect of Increased IIDR in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (09) ◽  
pp. 777-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Holden ◽  
Margaret W. Skinner ◽  
Marios S. Fourakis ◽  
Timothy A. Holden
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Sound Field ◽  
The Other ◽  
Threshold Levels ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
El Sistema ◽  
Initial Activation ◽  
Implant System

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the increased instantaneous input dynamic range (IIDR) in the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (CI) system on recipients' ability to perceive soft speech and speech in noise. Ten adult Freedom CI recipients participated. Two maps differing in IIDR were placed on each subject's processor at initial activation. The IIDR was set to 30 dB for one map and 40 dB for the other. Subjects used both maps for at least one month prior to speech perception testing. Results revealed significantly higher scores for words (50 dB SPL), for sentences in background babble (65 dB SPL), and significantly lower sound field threshold levels with the 40 compared to the 30 dB IIDR map. Ceiling effects may have contributed to non-significant findings for sentences in quiet (50 dB SPL). The Freedom's increased IIDR allows better perception of soft speech and speech in noise. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto del rango dinámico aumentado instantáneo de ingreso (IIDR) en el sistema de implante coclear (IC) Nucleus Freedom, sobre la capacidad de sujetos implantados para percibir lenguaje a bajo volumen y lenguaje en ruido. Diez sujetos implantados con el IC Freedom participaron. En la activación inicial, dos mapas con una diferencia en cuanto al IIDR se colocaron en el procesador de cada sujeto. El IIDR fue ajustado a 30 dB para un mapa y a 40 dB para el otro. Los sujetos utilizaron ambos mapas por al menos un mes, antes de una evaluación de percepción del lenguaje. Los resultados revelaron puntajes significativamente más altos para palabras (50 dB SPL), para frases en balbuceo de fondo (65 dB SPL), y niveles umbrales en campo libre significativamente más bajos con el mapa de IIDR de 40 comparado con el de 30. Efectos tope pueden haber contribuido a los hallazgos no significativos para frases en silencio (50 dB SPL). El IIDR aumentado para Freedom permite mejor percepción para el lenguaje a bajo volumen y el lenguaje en medio de ruido.

scholarly journals Objective and subjective evaluations of the Nurotron Venus cochlear implant system via animal experiments and clinical trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Gao ◽  
Xin-Da Xu ◽  
Fang-Lu Chi ◽  
Fan-Gang Zeng ◽  
Qian-Jie Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Animal Experiments ◽  
Subjective Evaluations ◽  
Implant System

Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jantien L. Vroegop ◽  
J. Gertjan Dingemanse ◽  
Marc P. van der Schroeff ◽  
André Goedegebure
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Sound Localization ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Hearing Aid Fitting ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Localization Test ◽  
Fitting Procedures ◽  
Auditory Performance ◽  
Contralateral Ear ◽  
Noise Test

PurposeThe aim of the study was to investigate the effect of 3 hearing aid fitting procedures on provided gain of the hearing aid in bimodal cochlear implant users and their effect on bimodal benefit.MethodThis prospective study measured hearing aid gain and auditory performance in a cross-over design in which 3 hearing aid fitting methods were compared. Hearing aid fitting methods differed in initial gain prescription rule (NAL-NL2 and Audiogram+) and loudness balancing method (broadband vs. narrowband loudness balancing). Auditory functioning was evaluated by a speech-in-quiet test, a speech-in-noise test, and a sound localization test. Fourteen postlingually deafened adult bimodal cochlear implant users participated in the study.ResultsNo differences in provided gain and in bimodal performance were found for the different hearing aid fittings. For all hearing aid fittings, a bimodal benefit was found for speech in noise and sound localization.ConclusionOur results confirm that cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the contralateral ear substantially benefit from bimodal stimulation. However, on average, no differences were found between different types of fitting methods, varying in prescription rule and loudness balancing method.

scholarly journals Electro-haptic hearing: Speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implant users is enhanced by tactile stimulation of the wrists

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Fletcher ◽  
Amatullah Hadeedi ◽  
Tobias Goehring ◽  
Sean R Mills
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Electrical Signal ◽  
Noise Performance ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Real World Application ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Stimulation Of

Cochlear implant (CI) users receive only limited sound information through their implant, which means that they struggle to understand speech in noisy environments. Recent work has suggested that combining the electrical signal from the CI with a haptic signal that provides crucial missing sound information (“electro-haptic stimulation”; EHS) could improve speech-in-noise performance. The aim of the current study was to test whether EHS could enhance speech-in-noise performance in CI users using: (1) a tactile signal derived using an algorithm that could be applied in real time, (2) a stimulation site appropriate for a real-world application, and (3) a tactile signal that could readily be produced by a compact, portable device. We measured speech intelligibility in multi-talker noise with and without vibro-tactile stimulation of the wrist in CI users, before and after a short training regime. No effect of EHS was found before training, but after training EHS was found to improve the number of words correctly identified by an average of 8.3 %-points, with some users improving by more than 20 %-points. Our approach could offer an inexpensive and non-invasive means of improving speech-in-noise performance in CI users.

scholarly journals Clarion 16 Cochlear Implant(System Introduction and Use Experience in Japan).

1998 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 578-585
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kawano ◽  
Sotaro Funasaka ◽  
Ayako Tomizawa ◽  
Akio Kato ◽  
Hiroshi Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Implant System

Evaluation of Automatic Directional Processing with Cochlear Implant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (08) ◽  
pp. 478-486
Author(s):  
Lisa G. Potts ◽  
Soo Jang ◽  
Cory L. Hillis
Keyword(s):  
Signal Processing ◽  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Noise Performance ◽  
Mixed Model Analysis ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise

Abstract Background For cochlear implant (CI) recipients, speech recognition in noise is consistently poorer compared with recognition in quiet. Directional processing improves performance in noise and can be automatically activated based on acoustic scene analysis. The use of adaptive directionality with CI recipients is new and has not been investigated thoroughly, especially utilizing the recipients' preferred everyday signal processing, dynamic range, and/or noise reduction. Purpose This study utilized CI recipients' preferred everyday signal processing to evaluate four directional microphone options in a noisy environment to determine which option provides the best speech recognition in noise. A greater understanding of automatic directionality could ultimately improve CI recipients' speech-in-noise performance and better guide clinicians in programming. Study Sample Twenty-six unilateral and seven bilateral CI recipients with a mean age of 66 years and approximately 4 years of CI experience were included. Data Collection and Analysis Speech-in-noise performance was measured using eight loudspeakers in a 360-degree array with HINT sentences presented in restaurant noise. Four directional options were evaluated (automatic [SCAN], adaptive [Beam], fixed [Zoom], and Omni-directional) with participants' everyday use signal processing options active. A mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparisons were performed. Results Automatic directionality (SCAN) resulted in the best speech-in-noise performance, although not significantly better than Beam. Omni-directional performance was significantly poorer compared with the three other directional options. A varied number of participants performed their best with each of the four-directional options, with 16 performing best with automatic directionality. The majority of participants did not perform best with their everyday directional option. Conclusion The individual variability seen in this study suggests that CI recipients try with different directional options to find their ideal program. However, based on a CI recipient's motivation to try different programs, automatic directionality is an appropriate everyday processing option.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document