Automatic feedback to promote safe walking and speech loudness control in persons with multiple disabilities: Two single-case studies

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O’Reilly ◽  
Vanessa A. Green ◽  
Gloria Alberti ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Mark O’Reilly ◽  
Nirbhay Singh ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Doretta Oliva ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O’Reilly ◽  
Vanessa Green ◽  
Doretta Oliva ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O’Reilly ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Gloria Alberti ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Lancioni ◽  
M. Antonucci ◽  
C. De Pace ◽  
M. F. O'Reilly ◽  
J. Sigaeoos ◽  
...  

Two single-case studies were carried out using different procedural and technological approaches to enable two adolescents with multiple disabilities to choose among environmental stimuli. Study I focused on replicating a recently developed procedure, which relied on samples of the auditory stimuli available as cues for choice responses. Study II assessed a new procedural and technical setup relying on the use of pictorial representations of the stimuli available as cues for choice responses. The auditory samples and the pictorial representations were presented through computer systems. The participants' choice responses relied on microswitches connected to the computer systems. The data of Study I fully supported previous findings with the same procedural approach. The participant learned to choose preferred stimuli and bypass nonpreferred ones. The data of Study II showed that the participant learned to concentrate his choice responses on a few stimuli, suggesting that these stimuli were actually preferred and that responding was purposeful. Implications of the results were discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 849-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O’Reilly ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Doretta Oliva ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 2191-2199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O’Reilly ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Doretta Oliva ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cheng Chen

The studies of post-communist Russia and China have traditionally been dominated by single-case studies and within-region comparisons. This chapter explores why the CAS of post-communist Russia and China is difficult, why it is rare, and how it could yield significant and unique intellectual payoffs. The cross-regional comparative study of anti-corruption campaigns in contemporary Russia and China is used as an example in this chapter to argue that a well-matched and context-sensitive comparison could reveal significant divergence in the elite politics and institutional capacities of these regimes that would otherwise likely be obscured by single-case studies or studies restricted to one single geographical area such as “Eastern Europe” or “East Asia.” By breaking Russia and China out of their respective “regions,” the CAS perspective thus enables us to better capture the full range of existing diversity of post-communist authoritarianism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document