scholarly journals Some notes on Mindsponge in infant cognition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tam-Tri Le
Keyword(s):  

I noted some thoughts on applying Mindsponge framework to some issues in infant cognition.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. eaar8334 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Winkler ◽  
J. L. Mueller ◽  
A. D. Friederici ◽  
C. Männel

Human cognition relies on the ability to encode complex regularities in the input. Regularities above a certain complexity level can involve the feature of embedding, defined by nested relations between sequential elements. While comparative studies suggest the cognitive processing of embedding to be human specific, evidence of its ontogenesis is lacking. To assess infants’ ability to process embedding, we implemented nested relations in tone sequences, minimizing perceptual and memory requirements. We measured 5-month-olds’ brain responses in two auditory oddball paradigms, presenting standard sequences with one or two levels of embedding, interspersed with infrequent deviant sequences violating the established embedding rules. Brain potentials indicate that infants detect embedding violations and thus appear to track nested relations. This shows that the ability to encode embedding may be part of the basic human cognitive makeup, which might serve as scaffolding for the acquisition of complex regularities in language or music.


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg D. Reynolds ◽  
John E. Richards

Author(s):  
Georges Rey ◽  
Marc Hauser

In recent years there has been a good deal of experimental work on the question of animal cognition, much of it modelled on recent experiments in infant cognition. Indeed, current research suggests that the distinction between the mental capacities of humans and many animals is far subtler and more difficult to determine than traditionally has been supposed. A promising proposal is that, although humans and animals share a surprising number of basic concepts and categories, only humans have the capacity to deal with them recursively. Throughout this entry ‘animal’ and ‘primate’ will be understood as prefixed with ‘non-human’.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 191795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Schlingloff ◽  
Gergely Csibra ◽  
Denis Tatone

Hamlin et al . found in 2007 that preverbal infants displayed a preference for helpers over hinderers. The robustness of this finding and the conditions under which infant sociomoral evaluation can be elicited has since been debated. Here, we conducted a replication of the original study, in which we tested 14- to 16-month-olds using a familiarization procedure with three-dimensional animated video stimuli. Unlike previous replication attempts, ours uniquely benefited from detailed procedural advice by Hamlin. In contrast with the original results, only 16 out of 32 infants (50%) in our study reached for the helper; thus, we were not able to replicate the findings. A possible reason for this failure is that infants' preference for prosocial agents may not be reliably elicited with the procedure and stimuli adopted. Alternatively, the effect size of infants’ preference may be smaller than originally estimated. The study addresses ongoing methodological debates on the replicability of influential findings in infant cognition.


1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Phillips ◽  
Simon Baron-Cohen ◽  
Michael Rutter

AbstractOne reason for looking at a person's eyes may be to diagnose their goal, because a person's eye direction reliably specifies what they are likely to act upon next. We report an experiment that investigates whether or not young normal infants use eye contact for this function. We placed them in situations in which the adult's action toward them was either ambiguous or unambiguous in its goal. Results showed that the majority of normal infants and young children with mental handicap made instant eye contact immediately following the ambiguous action but rarely after the unambiguous action. Young children with autism, in contrast, made eye contact equally (little) in both conditions. These results are discussed in relation to the function of eye contact, to our understanding of infant cognition, and to the theory of mind hypothesis of autism.


Infancy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie B. Cohen

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain Jackson ◽  
Sylvain Sirois

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document