2. Administrasi Kurikulum

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ditri Wily Mandayanti ◽  
Hade Afriansyah

The writing of this article aims to find out how important an educator has education and curriculum. The curriculum is very closely related to management, namely as planning, organizing, implementing and monitoring. So in the application of curriculum administration, a person who manages an educational institution masters the science of management, both for matters relating to education and with the curriculum itself. That's why curriculum administration is very important to learn because educators are the spearhead in the implementation of education itself. The teacher's role in curriculum development is as implementers, adapters, developers and researchers. In addition, the teacher's role in curriculum development is as centralized and decentralized. This article writing technique uses literature studies or literature studies whose sources come from papers, journals, books, and articles.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ditri Wily Mandayanti ◽  
Hade Afriansyah

The writing of this article aims to find out how important an educator has education and curriculum. The curriculum is very closely related to management, namely as planning, organizing, implementing and monitoring. So in the application of curriculum administration, a person who manages an educational institution masters the science of management, both for matters relating to education and with the curriculum itself. That's why curriculum administration is very important to learn because educators are the spearhead in the implementation of education itself. The teacher's role in curriculum development is as implementers, adapters, developers and researchers. In addition, the teacher's role in curriculum development is as centralized and decentralized. This article writing technique uses literature studies or literature studies whose sources come from papers, journals, books, and articles.


Author(s):  
Halyna Horbenko

The article substantiates a need for clarification of the nature and characteristics of professional competences of bachelors of advertising and public relations; it is stated on insufficient study of professional competencies of bachelors of advertising and public relations, the essence of professional competencies of future professionals of the field of the study; the points of view of various researchers as to the content and nature of professional competenceare represented; the teacher’s role in development of students’ competencies of higher education institutions are given. Also it is revealed the general and professional competencies represented in the educational bachelor programs of advertising and public relations of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University; it is represented a set of professional competencies in terms of the employer; it is marked an important role in the process of formation of professional competencies of various technologies, forms and methods of teaching, combined with a set of approaches implemented in the educational institution. The conclusions deal with the conditions, which the content of the process in formation of professional competencies of advertising and public relations bachelors depends on.


1982 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
William McClure ◽  
Michael Stohl

The conventional introductory course rests upon the pedagogical assumption that the teacher's function is to transmit information (or knowledge) and that the student's function is to receive it. According to this transmitter-receiver model of the educational process, teaching begins with a “knower” who “transmits” what he knows to a “learner.” In higher education, certain euphemisms are employed to soften and furnish a color of legitimacy to this model: the teacher is a “scholar,” and “authority,” in his field; he possesses an “expert knowledge” which the student has come to school to “learn“; the student is the “learner.” The teacher's role, accordingly, is the active one of transmitting information and the student's role, accordingly, is the passive one of receiving and recording (or memorizing) this information.


2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-45
Author(s):  
Gwyn Symonds

This paper views the teacher’s role as “performance,”; as Acting theory defines it. This paradigm for teacher reflection allows practitioners working with students with challenging behaviours to mark out a space in which to operate where teacher response can avoid negative emotionalism, stress and personalisation of conflict with the student. This approach recognises that there is a “role”; that is played by teachers which is both professional and adopted, separate from the sense of self and personal identity that can be wounded by student oppositional behaviour, particularly if it is abusive. Being alert to aspects of performing that role enables teacher response to challenging behaviours to be de-personalised, thus increasing the teacher’s sense of self-efficacy, the effectiveness of interventions that defuse oppositional behaviour and effective student learning. Some of the delivery techniques of the craft of acting (body awareness, tone, breathing), and the concepts of the classroom as “stage”; and positive reinforcement as “script”; are discussed to assist teachers to bridge the gap between knowledge of the skills of positive reinforcement and positive correction and their implementation. The paradigm under discussion has been developed from my own professional experience in ED/BD classes, from imparting training and development on de-stressing the management of challenging behaviours to teachers and teaching assistants, as well as to practicum students under my supervision, and from the delivery of parent education courses to parents of students with oppositional behaviours. The methodological comparison between aspects of Acting theory and the performance of teaching is offered as an aid to enhance a professional, calm, and astute approach to the implementation of positive reinforcement and positive correction techniques. The use of Acting theory enables a professional mind shift for teacher reflection so that negative stimuli to student behaviour problems from teacher responses can be avoided.


AAUP Bulletin ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
Emerson Shuck

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document