mental health specialist
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

33
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 3)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e047829
Author(s):  
Markus W Haun ◽  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Alina Wildenauer ◽  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
...  

ObjectiveDespite available effective treatments for mental health disorders, few patients in need receive even the most basic care. Integrated telepsychiatry services may be a viable option to increase access to mental healthcare. The aim of this qualitative process evaluation embedded in a randomised controlled feasibility trial was to explore health providers’ experiences with a mental healthcare model integrating mental health specialist video consultations (MHSVC) and primary care.MethodsA qualitative process evaluation focusing on MHSVC in primary care was conducted. In 13 semistructured interviews, we assessed the experience of all mental health specialists, primary care physicians and medical assistants who participated in the trial. A thematic analysis, focusing on the implementation, mechanisms of impact and context, was applied to investigate the data.ResultsConsidering (1) the implementation, participants evaluated the consultations as feasible, easy to use and time saving. Concerning (2) the mechanisms of impact, the consultations were regarded as effective for patients. Providers attributed the patients’ improvements to two key aspects: the familiarity of the primary care practice and the fast access to specialist mental healthcare. Mental health specialists observed trustful therapeutic alliances emerging and described their experience as comparable to same-room care. However, compared with same-room care, specialists perceived the video consultations as more challenging and sometimes more exhausting due to the additional effort required for establishing therapeutic alliances. Regarding (3) the intervention’s context, shorter travel distances for patients positively affected the implementation, while technical failures, that is, poor Internet connectivity, emerged as the main barrier.ConclusionsMHSVCs in primary care are feasible and successful in improving access to mental healthcare for patients. To optimise engagement and comfort of both patients and health providers, future work should focus on empirical determinants for establishing robust therapeutic alliances with patients receiving MHSVC (eg, leveraging non-verbal cues for therapeutic purposes).Trial registration numberDRKS00015812; Results.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus W. Haun ◽  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Regina Brinster ◽  
Dorothea Weber ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The majority of people with mental disorders, including those with severe and chronic disorders, are treated solely by their general practitioner (GP). Nevertheless, specialised mental health care may be required for specific patients. Notably, the accessibility of mental health specialist care is mainly complicated by (a) long waiting times for an appointment with specialists, (b) long travel distances to specialists, particularly in rural and remote areas and (c) patients’ reservations about mental health specialist care (including fear of being stigmatised by seeking such care). To mitigate those barriers, technology-based integrated care models have been proposed. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mental health specialist video consultations model versus treatment as usual in patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care. Methods: In an individually randomised, prospective, two-arm superiority trial with parallel group design, N = 320 patients with anxiety and/or depressive disorder will be recruited in general practices. The intervention includes a newly developed treatment model based on video consultations with focus on diagnostics, treatment planning, and short-term intervention by mental health specialists. We will systematically compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects of this new model with usual care by the GP: The primary outcome is the absolute change in the mean depressive and anxiety symptom severity measured on the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) from baseline to 6 months after baseline assessment. Follow-up in both groups will be conducted by blinded outcome assessors at 6 months and 12 months after baseline. The main analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. We will optimise the likelihood of treatment effectiveness by strict inclusion criteria for patients, enhanced intervention integrity, and conducting a process evaluation. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first confirmatory study on a video-based, integrated care model for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in GP patients in Germany. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, United States National Institutes of Health (NCT04316572, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04316572). Prospectively registered on 20 March 2020.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Anwar A. Sayed

Introduction: Benign hematological disorders (BHDs) such as anemias and sickle cell disease have a major burden of disease in Saudi Arabia (SA). Their prevalence is estimated to exceed 50% of the total population. and they are responsible for one fifth of total hospital admissions. Although treatable, most of these hematological conditions are of chronic nature and remain without a cure. The chronicity of these conditions poses a great risk of developing depression among patients, especially among those who experience symptoms. The development of depression, besides its own social and psychological burden on patients, it further worsens the impact of these BHDs as it negatively affects patients' compliance and adherence to treatment leading to worse prognosis. One of the biggest challenges in managing depression, among those with BHDs, is its detection by the treating physician. This study aims to examine physicians' perception and attitude towards depression among their patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study, in which an anonymized survey was distributed to 29 physicians who are working in SA who treat BHDs. Physicians who cannot read English, are no longer practising or not dealing with patients with hematological conditions were excluded from the study. The survey had 2 sections to assess physicians' knowledge of depression and their attitudes towards it e.g. willingness to attend mental health training, discussion in current practice and updating working guidelines. A knowledge score (K score) and an attitude score (A score) were calculated based on their survey responses to a maximum of 16 and 4, respectively. The distribution of K and A scores were determined using Shapiro Wilk Test. Multivariate analysis was used to compare K and A scores according to the independent physicians' variants. Correlations were determined using two-tailed Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was denoted at a P value less than 0.05. This study was approved by Taibah University College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee. Results: Twenty-nine physicians were enrolled in this study, of which 27% were female (n=8). The median physicians' age was 27 years (range 24 - 50 years old). Female physicians were significantly older than male physicians, and subsequently their years of experience was significantly longer (P value < 0.0001). The physicians' specialties included Family Medicine (n=10), Internal Medicine (n=10), Pediatrics (n=2) and others (n=7). All but one physician completed their medical education in SA, and only 2 physicians completed their training outside SA. Sixteen physicians have referred patients to a mental health specialist in the last 3 years, of which only 2 female physicians (25% of the total female physicians) as compared to 14 male physicians (~67%).The median K and A scores for the cohort was 9 (out of 16) and 2.5 (out of 4), respectively. There was no significant difference between the K score of the male and female physicians, however, female physicians had significantly lower A score. Using 2-way ANOVA to assess if physicians' gender and their referral of patients to mental health specialists affect any of the scores, it was found that gender significantly influence A score (P value < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in K and A scores between physicians based on their place of work, the number of patients seen daily or whether they referred a patient to a mental health specialist in the last 3 years. Both K and A scores correlated negatively with physicians' years of experience, however, only A scores correlated significantly with years of experience (r=-0.4, P value < 0.01). Upon further grouping of physicians based on their years of experience (<1 year; 1-5 years and > 5 years), physicians with less than 1 year of experience had the highest K and A scores compared to the rest of the cohort. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that early career physicians are more knowledgeable and have a better attitude towards depression, predominantly among male physicians. These findings indicate that undiagnosed depression among patients with BHDs can be attributed to physicians' knowledge and attitude towards depression. Training programs and practice guidelines should prepare physicians to adopt a holistic approach in dealing with patients with BHDs and actively screen for depression among their patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Joachim Szecsenyi ◽  
Frank Peters-Klimm ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Most people suffering from depression and anxiety disorders are solely treated by their primary care physician. Access to specialized mental health care is impeded by patients’ comorbidity and immobility in ageing societies and long waiting times on the providers’ end. Video-based integrated care models may leverage limited resources more efficiently and provide timely specialized care in the primary care environment the patient is already familiar with. OBJECTIVE In an individually randomized controlled trial we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mental health specialist video consultations with primary care patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder. METHODS Participants were recruited by their primary care physicians during regular practice visits. Eligible patients were required to experience at least moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety disorder. Patients were randomized in two groups receiving either treatment as usual as provided by their general practitioner or up to five video consultations conducted by a mental health specialist. Video consultations focused on (1) systematic diagnosis plus proactive monitoring using validated clinical rating scales, (2) the establishment of an effective working alliance and (3) a stepped-care algorithm within integrated care adjusting treatments based on clinical outcomes. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, rate of loss to follow-up, acceptability of treatment and attendance at sessions. Effectiveness outcomes included depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), burden of specific somatic complaints (Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale, SSD-12), recovery (Recovery Assessment Scale, RAS-G), and perception of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, PACIC–Short Form) – which were measured at baseline and 16 weeks post-allocation by assessors blinded to group allocation. RESULTS Fifty patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder were randomized, 23 to the intervention group and 27 to the treatment-as-usual group. The recruitment yield (number randomized per number screened) and consent rate (number randomized per number eligible) were 50/73 (68.5%) and 50/58 (86.2%), respectively. Concerning acceptability, 20 (87.0%) of the 23 in the intervention group completed the intervention. Of 108 planned video consultations, 102 (94.4%) were delivered. Follow-up rates were 95.7% and 85.2% for the intervention and the control group, respectively. Change from baseline scores at post-measurement for the “No Domination by Symptoms” domain of recovery (RAS-G) were somewhat higher for the intervention group compared to the control group (Mann-Whitney U-Test: rank-biserial r = 0.19 [-0.09; 0.46], P = .18). We did not detect any notable differences between the intervention group and the control group for the other effectiveness outcomes. We did not observe any serious adverse events related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS The intervention and study procedures are feasible for patients, primary care practice staff, and mental health specialists. A sufficiently powered pragmatic trial on mental health specialist video consultations should be conducted to investigate effectiveness in routine care. CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trials Register (registration no. DRKS00015812).


10.2196/17330 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. e17330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Bleyel ◽  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Hans-Christoph Friederich ◽  
...  

Background Due to limited access to specialist services, most patients with common mental disorders (depression or anxiety, or both) usually receive treatment in primary care. More recently, innovative technology-based care models (eg, video consultations) have been proposed to facilitate access to specialist services. Against this background, the PROVIDE (Improving Cross-Sectoral Collaboration Between Primary and Psychosocial Care: An Implementation Study on Video Consultations) project aims to improve the provision of psychosocial care through implementing video consultations integrated into routine primary care. Objective From the patients’ perspective, this qualitative preimplementation study explored (1) anticipated benefits from and (2) barriers to implementing mental health specialist video consultations embedded in primary care services and (3) prerequisites for interacting with therapists via video consultations. Methods Using a purposive (ie, stratified) sampling strategy, we recruited 13 patients from primary care practices and a tertiary care hospital (psychosomatic outpatient clinic) for one-off semistructured interviews. In a computer-assisted thematic analysis, we inductively (bottom-up) derived key themes concerning the practicability of mental health specialist video consultations. To validate our results, we discussed our findings with the interviewees as part of a systematic member checking. Results Overall, we derived 3 key themes and 10 subthemes. Participants identified specific benefits in 2 areas: the accessibility of mental health specialist care (shorter waiting times: 11/13, 85%; lower threshold for seeking specialist mental health care: 6/13, 46%; shorter travel distances: 3/13, 23%); and the environment in primary care (familiar travel modalities, premises, and employees: 5/13, 38%). The main barriers to the implementation of mental health video consultations from the patients’ perspective were the lack of face-to-face contact (13/13, 100%) and technical challenges (12/13, 92%). Notably, participants’ prerequisites for interacting with therapists (12/13, 92%) did not seem to differ much from those concerning face-to-face contacts. Conclusions Mental health service users mostly welcomed mental health specialist video consultations in primary care. Taking a pragmatic stance, service users, who are often frustrated about uncoordinated care, particularly valued the embedment of the consultations in the familiar environment of the primary care practice. With respect to interventional studies and implementation, our findings underscore the need to minimize technical disruptions during video consultations and to ensure optimal resemblance to face-to-face settings (eg, by training therapists in consistently reacting to nonverbal cues). Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012487; https://tinyurl.com/uhg2one


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Bleyel ◽  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Hans-Christoph Friederich ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Due to limited access to specialist services, most patients with common mental disorders (depression or anxiety, or both) usually receive treatment in primary care. More recently, innovative technology-based care models (eg, video consultations) have been proposed to facilitate access to specialist services. Against this background, the PROVIDE (Improving Cross-Sectoral Collaboration Between Primary and Psychosocial Care: An Implementation Study on Video Consultations) project aims to improve the provision of psychosocial care through implementing video consultations integrated into routine primary care. OBJECTIVE From the patients’ perspective, this qualitative preimplementation study explored (1) anticipated benefits from and (2) barriers to implementing mental health specialist video consultations embedded in primary care services and (3) prerequisites for interacting with therapists via video consultations. METHODS Using a purposive (ie, stratified) sampling strategy, we recruited 13 patients from primary care practices and a tertiary care hospital (psychosomatic outpatient clinic) for one-off semistructured interviews. In a computer-assisted thematic analysis, we inductively (bottom-up) derived key themes concerning the practicability of mental health specialist video consultations. To validate our results, we discussed our findings with the interviewees as part of a systematic member checking. RESULTS Overall, we derived 3 key themes and 10 subthemes. Participants identified specific benefits in 2 areas: the accessibility of mental health specialist care (shorter waiting times: 11/13, 85%; lower threshold for seeking specialist mental health care: 6/13, 46%; shorter travel distances: 3/13, 23%); and the environment in primary care (familiar travel modalities, premises, and employees: 5/13, 38%). The main barriers to the implementation of mental health video consultations from the patients’ perspective were the lack of face-to-face contact (13/13, 100%) and technical challenges (12/13, 92%). Notably, participants’ prerequisites for interacting with therapists (12/13, 92%) did not seem to differ much from those concerning face-to-face contacts. CONCLUSIONS Mental health service users mostly welcomed mental health specialist video consultations in primary care. Taking a pragmatic stance, service users, who are often frustrated about uncoordinated care, particularly valued the embedment of the consultations in the familiar environment of the primary care practice. With respect to interventional studies and implementation, our findings underscore the need to minimize technical disruptions during video consultations and to ensure optimal resemblance to face-to-face settings (eg, by training therapists in consistently reacting to nonverbal cues). CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012487; https://tinyurl.com/uhg2one


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e030003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Joachim Szecsenyi ◽  
Andrea Icks ◽  
...  

IntroductionMost people suffering from depression and anxiety disorders are entirely treated in primary care. Due to growing challenges in ageing societies, for example, patients’ immobility and multimorbidity, the transition to specialised care becomes increasingly difficult. Although the co-location of general practitioners and mental health specialists improves the access to psychosocial care, integrated in-person approaches are not practical for rural and single-doctor practices with limited personnel and financial resources. Treating primary care patients via internet-based video consultations by remotely located mental health specialists bears the potential to overcome structural barriers and provide low-threshold care. The aim of this randomised controlled feasibility trial is to investigate the feasibility of implementing of mental health specialist video consultations in primary care practices.Methods and analysisFifty primary care patients with significant depression and/or anxiety symptomatology will be randomised in two groups receiving either the treatment as usual as provided by their general practitioner or up to five video consultations conducted by a mental health specialist. The video consultations focus on (1) systematic diagnosis plus proactive monitoring using validated clinical rating scales, (2) the establishment of an effective working alliance and (3) a stepped-care algorithm within integrated care adjusting treatments based on clinical outcomes. We will investigate the following outcomes: effectiveness of the recruitment strategies, patient acceptance of randomisation, practicability of the technical and logistical processes related to implementing video consultations in the practices’ workflows, feasibility of the data collection and clinical parameters.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has undergone ethical scrutiny and has been approved by the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg Ethics Committee (S-634/2018). The findings will be disseminated to the research community through presentations at conferences and publications in scientific journals. This feasibility trial will prepare the ground for a large-scale, fully powered randomised controlled trial.Trial registration numberDRKS00015812.


10.2196/13382 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. e13382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Hans-Christoph Friederich ◽  
Markus W Haun

Background Although real-time mental health specialist video consultations have been proposed as an effective care model for treating patients with mental health conditions in primary care, little is known about their integration into routine practice from the perspective of family physicians. Objective This study aimed to determine the degree to which family physicians advocate that mental health specialist video consultations can be integrated into routine primary care, where most patients with mental health conditions receive treatment. Methods In a cross-sectional qualitative study, we conducted 4 semistructured focus groups and 3 telephonic interviews in a sample of 19 family physicians from urban and rural districts. We conducted a qualitative content analysis applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework in a combined bottom-up (data-driven) and top-down strategy for deriving key domains. Results Family physicians indicated that mental health specialist video consultations are a promising and practical way to address the most pressing challenges in current practice, that is, to increase the accessibility and co-ordination of specialized care. Individual health professional factors were the most frequently discussed topics. Specifically, family physicians valued the anticipated clinical outcomes for patients and the anticipated resources set for the primary care practice as major facilitators (16/19, 84%). However, family physicians raised a concern regarding a lack of facial expressions and physical interaction (19/19, 100%), especially in emergency situations. Therefore, most family physicians considered a viable emergency plan for mental health specialist video consultations that clearly delineates the responsibilities and tasks of both family physicians and mental health specialists to be essential (11/19, 58%). Social, political, and legal factors, as well as guideline factors, were hardly discussed as prerequisites for individual family physicians to integrate mental health specialist video consultations into routine care. To facilitate the implementation of future mental health specialist video consultation models, we compiled a checklist of recommendations that covers (1) buy-in from practices (eg, emphasizing logistical and psychological relief for the practice), (2) the engagement of patients (eg, establishing a trusted patient-provider relationship), (3) the setup and conduct of consultations (eg, reliable emergency plans), and (4) the fostering of collaboration between family physicians and mental health specialists (eg, kick-off meetings to build trust). Conclusions By leveraging the primary care practice as a familiar environment for patients, mental health specialist video consultations provide timely specialist support and potentially lead to benefits for patients and more efficient processes of care. Integration should account for the determinants of practice as described by the family physicians. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012487; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012487


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document