scholarly journals Early Re- Laparoscopy in Suspected Bile Duct Injuries after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1396-1400
Author(s):  
Roshan Ghimire ◽  
Dhiresh Maharjan ◽  
Prabin Thapa
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Definitive Repair ◽  
Operative Findings

Introduction: Management of patients with suspected bile leak or bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is challenging. Early laparoscopy in these groups of patients will benefit in terms of diagnostic as well therapeutic purpose. Objective: This study is done to assess utility of early re-laparoscopy in suspected bile duct injury in early postoperative period following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology: It is a descriptive study of all consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic as well therapeutic re-laparoscopy when required in suspected bile duct injury in early postoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy that is within 72 hours of presentation. Study was conducted over a period from June 2019 to December 2020 at Kathmandu medical College, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal. Relaparoscopic operative findings and therapeutic intervention done were recorded. Result: The mean age at presentation was 34.6 years and male to female ratio was 1:1.8. During the study period, eleven patients underwent re-laparoscopy out of which one had no bile leak. Six out of ten were managed definitely in the same time of re-laparoscopy. However, four patients underwent definitive biliary reconstruction as they had already undergone arteriography in CT scan. Conclusions: Early re-laparoscopy may be beneficial prior to detail radiological investigations in suspected bile leak patients. Early re-laparoscopy can be an effective diagnostic as well therapeutic tool; and also it can help in planning for definitive repair in later date. 

scholarly journals Bile Duct Injuries Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Haridas Saha ◽  
Azmal Kader Chowdhury ◽  
Imarat Hossain ◽  
AZM Mostaque Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Common Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Case Files

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for the gall stone diseases.Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) by determining the frequency of complications especially of bile duct injuries.Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of surgery at Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. The case files of all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) from the year of 2013 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The data were collected according to outcome measures, such as bile duct injury, morbidity, mortality and numbers of patients whose resections had to be converted from laparoscopic to open surgery.Results: During the three years a total number of 336 patients were underwent LC for chronic cholecystitis (CC) of which 22(6.5%) developed complications. Among those who developed complications, two patients had major bile duct injuries (0.4%); other 43(12.8%) patients had planned laparoscopic operations converted to open cholecystectomy intra-operatively. None of the patients in this study died as a result of LC.Conclusion: The two patients who had severe common bile duct injury in this study had major anatomical anomalies that were only recognized during surgery.Journal of Science Foundation 2017;15(1):14-19

scholarly journals BILE DUCT INJURIES

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (05) ◽  
pp. 841-844
Author(s):  
Sadia Sana ◽  
Muhammad Jawed ◽  
Ubedullah Shaikh ◽  
Shazia Ubed Shaikh
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Group ◽  
Male Female Ratio ◽  
Group B

Objective: To find out frequency of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomyprocedures either open or laparoscopic. Study design: Prospective observational study. Placeand duration of study: This study was conducted at Surgical department, Liaquat UniversityHospital Jamshoro and Dow International Hospital Karachi, from July 2012 to December2013. Methodology: This study consisted of hundred patients. Patients were divided in twogroups. Group A for open cholecystectomy (OC) comprising of 50 patients who underwentelective open cholecystectomy. Group B for Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) comprisingof 50 patients who underwent elective Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Inclusion criteria wereall patients diagnosed case of gallstones on the basis of ultrasound abdomen, any age andboth gender. Exclusion criteria included not willing for surgery, General anesthesia problem,pregnant ladies due to risk of foetal loss, carcinoma of gall bladder, stone in CBD and obstructivejaundice. Results: Out of 100 cases of gallstone were operated for either laparoscopic / opencholecystectmy. In open cholecystectomy group 20(40 % ) were male and 30(60 %) female.Ratio male: female ratio of 1:1.5. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy group 11(22 % ) were maleand 39(78 %) female with male: female ratio of 1:3.5. There was wide variation of age rangingfrom a minimum of 10 year to 70 year in both group. The mean age was 41.28+12.30 yearsfor OC group and 38.44+13.50 years for LC group (p 0.02). Common bile duct injury wereoccurred 2(4%) patients in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group while 3(6%) patients observedin open cholecystectomy group. Conclusions: We conclude that found bile duct injury 2(4%)patients in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group while 3(6%) patients observed in opencholecystectomy group

scholarly journals Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries: An Overview and A Review of Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 037-043
Author(s):  
Vinoth M. ◽  
Abhijit Joshi
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury

Abstract​ Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) is a serious complication of LC and has an incidence of 0.3 to 0.7%. Since it is associated with a significant and potentially lifelong morbidity as well as mortality, diagnosing IBDI as early as possible is of paramount importance. Management of bile duct injuries and prognosis of their surgical repair depend on the timing of its recognition, type and the extent of the injury. In this paper, we present a case of IBDI and attempt to discuss all its dimensions.

The Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries: An Analysis of 300 Cases of from a Human Factors and Cognitive Psychology Perspective

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 617-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lygia Stewart ◽  
Lawrence W. Way
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Human Error ◽  
Perceptual Illusion ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Psychology Perspective ◽  
Cause Of Error ◽  
Key Steps

Application of human factors concepts to high-risk activities has facilitated reduction in human error. With introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the incidence of bile duct injury increased. Seeking ideas for prevention, we analyzed 300 laparoscopic bile duct injuries within the framework of human error analysis. The primary cause of error (97%) was a visual perceptual illusion. The laparoscopic environment contributed to 75% of injuries, poor visibility 22%. Most injuries involved deliberate major bile duct transection due to misperception of the anatomy. This illusion was so compelling that the surgeon usually did not recognize it. Even when irregular cues were detected, improper rules were employed, eliminating feedback. Since the complication-causing error occurred at few key steps during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; we instituted focused training to heighten vigilance, and have formulated specific rules to decrease the incidence of bile duct injury. In addition, factors in the laparoscopic environment contributing to this illusion are discussed.

scholarly journals Tulžies latakų sužalojimai atliekant laparoskopinę cholecistektomiją

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Donatas Venskutonis ◽  
Linas Urbanavičius ◽  
Juozas Juočas ◽  
Saulius Bradulskis ◽  
Virmantas Daubaras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Bile Ducts ◽  
Diffuse Peritonitis ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Extrahepatic Bile Ducts ◽  
Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury

Donatas Venskutonis, Linas Urbanavičius, Juozas Juočas, Saulius Bradulskis, Virmantas Daubaras, Juozas KutkevičiusKauno medicinos universiteto Bendrosios chirurgijos klinika,VšĮ Kauno II klinikinė ligoninė, Josvainių g. 2, LT-47133 KaunasEl paštas: [email protected] Įvadas / tikslas Manoma, kad atliekant laparoskopinę cholecistektomiją ekstrahepatiniai tulžies latakai sužalojami dažniau nei atvirąją. Įvykus tulžies latakų sužalojimui, svarbu jį kuo skubiau diagnozuoti ir tinkamai gydyti. Siūlomos įvairios sužalojimų prevencijos priemonės. Šio darbo tikslas – išanalizuoti KMU Bendrosios chirurgijos klinikoje 1994–2006 metais laparoskopinės cholecistektomijos metu įvykusių ekstrahepatinių tulžies latakų jatrogeninių sužalojimų dažnį, priežastis, gydymo metodus, padarinius ir prevencijos priemones, apžvelgti literatūros duomenis. Ligoniai ir metodai Analizavome 1994–2006 m. KMU Bendrosios chirurgijos klinikoje (VšĮ II KKL) dėl tulžies latakų jatrogeninių sužalojimų, įvykusių laparoskopinės cholecistektomijos metu, gydytų pacientų ligos istorijas. Rezultatai Per minėtą laikotarpį atliktos 5396 laparoskopinės cholecistektomijos: 1681 (31,2%) pacientui – dėl ūminio ir 3715 (68,8%) – dėl lėtinio cholecistito. Po operacijos 7 ligoniai mirė. Vienas ligonis mirė nuo bendrojo tulžies latako sužalojimo ir pankreatito. Kitos mirties priežastys: trims ligoniams buvo plaučių arterijos embolija, vienam – dvylikapirštės žarnos perforacija ir peritonitas, dviem – gangreninis cholecistitas ir lokalus peritonitas. Bendras mirštamumas 0,13%. Ekstrahepatiniai tulžies latakai sužaloti 10 ligonių (0,19%). Vienas ligonis gydytas nuo tulžies latakų sužalojimo kitoje ligoninėje. Išvados Apibendrinus rezultatus galima tvirtinti, kad tulžies latakų sužalojimo ir mirties atvejai operuojant laparoskopiškai yra reti, o laparoskopinė cholecistektomija mūsų klinikoje – saugi operacija. Atvira cholecistektomija pranašesnė tik sunkiais, komplikuotais atvejais (neaiški anatomija, tulžies pūslės-žarnyno fistulės) ir nesant galimybės išgydyti tulžies latakų akmenligės endoskopiškai. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: cholecistitas, laparoskopinė cholecistektomija, ekstrahepatiniai tulžies latakai, sužalojimai Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy donatas venskutonis, linas urbanavičius, juozas juočas, saulius bradulskis, virmantas daubaras, juozas kutkevičiusKaunas University of Medicine Clinic of General Surgery, Kaunas 2nd Clinical Hospital,Josvainių str. 2, LT-47133, Kaunas, LithuaniaE-mail: [email protected] Background / objective Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher risk of extrahepatic bile duct injuries. Timely diagnosis and proper management of bile duct injury are very important. Various preventive measures are widely discussed. Our aim was to analyze iatrogenic injuries of extrahepatic bile ducts sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the period 1994–2006 at the Clinic of General Surgery of Kaunas University of Medicine and to review the relevant pub-lished reports. Patients and methods Analysis of the case histories of patients treated for iatrogenic bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the period 1994–2006 at the Clinic of General Surgery of Kaunas University of Medicine (2nd Clinical Hospital), Lithuania. Results During the period 1994–2006, 5396 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (n = 1681, 31.2%) and chronic gallstone disease (n = 3715, 68.8%). Seven patients died after surgery: one patient died of bile duct injury, 3 patients of pulmonary artery embolism; there were one case of duodenum perforation and diffuse peritonitis, one case of severe acute pancreatitis, and 2 cases of gangrenous cholecystitis with peritonitis. The overall mortality rate was 0.13%. Iatrogenic bile duct injury occurred in 10 cases (0.19%). One patient was referred from another hospital and was treated for a iatrogenic bile duct injury. Conclusions The incidence of bile duct injuries and the death rate were low. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed with acceptable safety in our clinic. Conventional cholecystectomy was preferred to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in difficult, complicated cases (unclear anatomy, biliary enteric fistulas) and in cases of unsuccessful endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis and obstructive jaundice. Keywords: cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, extrahepatic bile ducts, injuries

Surgical Management of Complex Bile Duct Injuries in Specialized Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1700-1702
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khawar Shahzad ◽  
Tariq Ali Bangash ◽  
Amer Latif ◽  
Hussam Ahmed ◽  
Muhammad Asif Naveed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries

Objective: To describe the surgical management of complex bile duct injuries in a specialized hepatopancreatobiliary unit. Design of the Study: It was a retrospective study. Study Settings: This study was carried out at Department of Anaesthesia and Hepatobiliary Unit, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Lahore from August 2017 to August 2019. Material and Methods: This retrospective study includes 80 patients of bile duct injury who underwent surgical correction of bile duct injury at specialized Hepatopancreatobiliary [HPB] and liver transplant department of Shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore. All the subjects were evaluated by retrospectively. The information regarding primary operative procedure, drain placement, T-tube placement, presentation, hospital stay, Liver Function Tests [LFTs], level of biliary tract injury and type of surgical procedure obtained from patients records. Results of the Study: During the study period 80 patients – 65 females and 15 male were operated for bile duct injury. Mean age was 39.89 years range 21 to 65 years. Hospital stay ranges from 9 to 36 days with mean of 16.18 days. Patients underwent open cholecystectomy, 43.8% laparoscopic cholecystectomy and in 3 patients procedure was converted from laparoscopic to open. 52.5% patients underwent open cholecystectomy, 43.8 laparoscopic cholecystectomy and in 3 patient’s procedure was converted from laparoscopic to open. Conclusion: It is concluded that the correct long lasting and physiological method to treat injuries of bile duct is only surgical repair. Although, surgical repair of bile duct must be operated by skilled hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeons. A practical method which is selected appropriately and implemented successfully has surely improved surgical outcome without any problem faced during the operation. Keywords: Hepatopancreatobiliary, Bile Duct Injury, Surgical Management

Is the Age of Patients with Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries Increasing?

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafał Stankiewicz ◽  
Bogusław Najnigier ◽  
Marek Krawczyk
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Elderly Person ◽  
Reference Centre ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Complications Of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury

AbstractResection of the gall-bladder is still the most common surgical procedure performed at general surgery departments. The laparoscopic method used in the majority of cases offers considerable benefits but at the same time is associated with an increased rate of bile duct complications. So far, a slim female aged 25-50 years was a typical patient with a iatrogenic bile duct injury.The aim of the study was to identify the age of patients with iatrogenic bile duct injuries as well as the clinical course observed in recent years.Material and methods. Gender and age structure of patients admitted to the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery between the beginning of 2011 and June 2014 and treated for iatrogenic bile duct injuries, complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were analysed. The patients were referred to the department as a reference centre.Results. In the group of 186 patients, females predominated (69.4%) and the mean age was 52 years. A considerable increase in the mean age of patients treated in 2014 as compared with previous years was seen. This was related to an increased rate of bile duct injuries in patients aged over 70 years, who accounted for about 25% of the group. In previous years, bile duct injuries in patients of such an advanced age happened considerably less frequently.Conclusions. A iatrogenic bile duct injury in an elderly person may prove a fatal complication. A repair surgery, i.e. the biliary-enteric anastomosis, is a major and burdensome procedure, particularly in the case of patients aged over 70 years. Special caution during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is advised in this population, and the slightest doubts should lead to conversion.

scholarly journals Managing bile duct injuries sustained during cholecystectomies

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Prakash Srivastava ◽  
Shwetank Agarwal ◽  
Ajai Agarwal ◽  
Jagadamba Sharan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Psychology ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Art And Science ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Science Technology

Background: Medical science is a blend of Art and Science. Technology evolved conceived presumably to improve the medical science. Increasing incidence of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomies proved otherwise. Multiple factors e.g. cognitive psychology, laparoscopic environment and no proper algorithms to manage, factor may be responsible for these results. To understand properly the mystique, we under took this study.Methods: This study was conducted on 200 cases which underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies. 12 cases developed bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 10 cases of bile duct injury sustained through open cholecystectomies were studied in detail results noted and analyzed.Results: All these cases 12/200 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 10/200 open cholecystectomies were followed up, sign and symptoms noted, USG studies, ERCP stenting, sphincterotomy studies reviewed and sequence of management underlined.Conclusions: Early realisation of bile duct injuries remains the hall mark of she success. Even in cases detected late, conservative procedure and stenting with or without sphincterotomy given relief in number of cases. Finally, if surgery is contemplated Roux-Y-biliary enteric procedure gives much better results.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in severe cholecystitis with unclear anatomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 3929
Author(s):  
Maged Rihan
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Subtotal Cholecystectomy ◽  
Port Site Hernia ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Aim of the study was to determine the differences between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy as regards bile duct injury and post-operative complications rates in patients with severe cholecystitis and obscure anatomy.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts and postoperative outcomes of 293 patients with severe cholecystitis who underwent either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy between September 2011 and January 2020. Patients with intraoperative altered anatomy which leaded to difficult dissection were defined as having severe cholecystitis.Results: There were 304 cholecystectomies done for patients with severe cholecystitis. Of those, 203 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC group), 90 underwent laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC group). There was no significant difference in male to female ratio, age, cases performed on an elective or emergency basis, hospital length of stay or initial operative findings. There were 5 patients with detected intraoperative biliary injury in LC group only. Postoperative bile leaks were significantly higher in the LSC (11.1%) than in the LC group (3.9%). Postoperative collections which needed percutaneous aspiration were also significantly higher in the LSC group (18.9%) than in the LC group (7.4%). Reoperation for collection was required in 8 patients in LC group and in 5 patients in LSC group. The rates of retained common bile duct stones, port site hernia, wound infections, and total complications were not significantly different between the two groups (28.1% v. 45.6%).Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe procedure which reduces the risk of bile duct injury and is comparable to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with severe cholecystitis with unclear anatomy.

scholarly journals Surgical management and follow up of patients with bile duct injuries in tertiary health care institute

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 954
Author(s):  
Shahnawaz Akram ◽  
Sadaf Ali ◽  
Omer Javid Shah ◽  
Anzar Santosh
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Type D ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Definitive Repair ◽  
Type C ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Surgical Unit

Background: Bile duct injury is an iatrogenic catastrophe associated with significant mortality, morbidity, decrease quality of life and higher rates of subsequent litigation. We conducted a study to analyse the presentation and pattern of bile duct injury managed at our surgical unit. Operative details, type of surgery, complications associated with the repair and Follow up in terms of liver function tests.Methods: The study included evaluation of 56 patients who had suffered bile duct injuries and then were subsequently being managed surgically at our institute retrospectively from October-2009 to 2012 and prospectively onwards till October- 2014. The mean follow up period in case of our study was 26.8 months. The follow up LFTs were performed at regular intervals. MRCP was used as a gold standard investigation.Results: jaundice (64.2%) was the most common presentation. Injuries noted were, type E1 in 16 (28.5%),type E2 in 11(19.6%), type E3 in 1 (1.8%), type A in 2 (3.6%), type B in 3 (5.4%), type C in 5 (9%) and type D in 18 (32.1%) of patients. Roux-en-y Hepatico-jejunostomy was the common definitive repair performed (85.7%) with various modifications. The mean bilirubin levels and ALP levels showed a downward trend in follow up .5 patients were readmitted with features of cholangitis in which 2 patients were reoperated and 3 patients were managed conservatively, 2 patients died.Conclusions: The management of patients with BDI is a challenge for a surgeon and often requires the skills of experienced hepatobiliary surgeons at tertiary referral canters.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document