scholarly journals A Concept Analysis: Caregivers’ burden of Elderly Adults with Alzheimer’s Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 155-159
Author(s):  
Onuma Kaewkerd ◽  
Jirawan Silaudom ◽  
Benjayamas Benjayamas ◽  
Benjayamas Benjayamas ◽  
Vasinbhath Piyapongsakul ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 2370-2371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Takahashi ◽  
Ryuji Sakakibara ◽  
Jalesh Panicker ◽  
Clare J. Fowler ◽  
Fuyuki Tateno ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 2169-2170
Author(s):  
Hiroyasu Akatsu ◽  
Norihiro Ogawa ◽  
Takeshi Kanesaka ◽  
Chie Taniguchi ◽  
Maya Mimuro ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S_Part_9) ◽  
pp. P332-P334
Author(s):  
Henry Ka Fung Mak ◽  
Queenie Chan ◽  
Zhipeng Zhang ◽  
Deqiang Qiu ◽  
Linda Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoharu Yamaguchi ◽  
Yohko Maki ◽  
Masamitsu Takatama ◽  
Haruyasu Yamaguchi

ABSTRACTBackground:Theory of Mind reasoning, which plays a pivotal role in social interaction, is required to detect deception. Empirically, those with cognitive decline are vulnerable to deception.Methods:Participants were 45 healthy elderly adults with clinical dementia rating (CDR) 0, and 76 outpatients: 25 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, CDR 0.5), 34 with mild Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD, CDR 1), and 17 with moderate ADD (CDR 2). The task consisted of two single-frame cartoons that depicted a character with an intention to deceive another character using social signs of gaze and pointing, and participants are provided clue questions to detect the character's intentions.Results:The percentage of participants who detected the character's intention decreased with ADD progression (CDR 0, 82.2%; CDR 0.5, 48.0%; CDR 1, 29.4%; and CDR 2, 0%). Total score (0–6) also decreased with ADD progression (CDR 0, 4.4 +/−1.1; CDR 0.5, 3.0 +/−1.3; CDR 1, 2.9 +/−1.5; and CDR 2, 1.6 +/−0.9).Discussion and Conclusions:The present study demonstrated that those with aMCI have difficulty in detecting other's deceiving intentions, when the intention was shown implicitly using social signs. In a previous study, we have reported that mild ADD showed difficulties in detecting intention, while aMCI succeeded in detection when the intention was depicted explicitly. These results together suggested that those with aMCI is vulnerable to deception when the intention was shown implicitly using non-verbal cues, while ADD may fail to detect the intention even when the intention was shown explicitly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document