scholarly journals Livedo of the Forearm in the Aftermath of Forearm Erysipelas

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-03
Author(s):  
Jochanan E. Naschitz

Livedo is an ischemic dermopathy caused by vasculopathies or prothrombotic states, and characterized by the violaceous lace-like mottling of the skin. We report on a patient who developed livedo reticularis – livedo racemosa overlap syndrome as a late sequel of erysipelas, the livedo being restricted to the limb segment affected earlier by erysipelas and devoid of systemic vasculopathy. Though erysipelas and livedo are common disorders, we could not find in the literature reports of an occurrence like that observed in this patient. In this case a favorable prognosis of livedo could be predicted. In a different context, livedo may be the alarming signal of an undiagnosed systemic disease.

Author(s):  
Min Kwang Byun ◽  
Hye Jung Park ◽  
Hyung Jung Kim ◽  
Chul Min Ahn ◽  
Kwang Ha Yoo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 414.2-414
Author(s):  
M. Scherlinger ◽  
J. Lutz ◽  
J. Sibilia ◽  
J. E. Gottenberg ◽  
T. Schaeverbeke ◽  
...  

Background:Overlap between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and another auto-immune systemic disease (AISD) in the same patient seems to be more frequent than each disease’s prevalence would explain.Objectives:Our aim was to investigate for overlap syndrome from 2 French cohorts of SSc patients and to compare their characteristics with non-overlap SSc.Methods:Our study was retrospective observational and bicentric. Patients responding to the 2013 ACR-EULAR scleroderma classification criteria for SSc were screened for concomitant AISD. Patients satisfying 2010 ACR-EULAR diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and/or 2016 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome (SgS) and/or 2012 SLICC systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria were included in our study. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were retrospectively retrieved from medical records and were compared to a SSc cohort.Results:A population of 534 SSc patients was studied. Thirty-four (6.4%) patients were identified as having overlap syndrome. There was 21 (3.9%) patients with RA, 14 (2.6%) with GSS and 4 (0.7%) with SLE (5 patients had 2 AISD). Diagnosis of RA, SLE or SgS was made after diagnosis of SSc for 22 (65%) patients, concomitantly for 10 patients (29%), and before for 2 (6%) patients. Interestingly, two patients with SSc/RA overlap were tested ACPA-positive 2 and 5 years before the first arthritis, respectively. Patients with SSc/RA were severe with 81% of them having erosive disease and despite treatment, only 48% (10/21) patients achieved RA remission (DAS28-CRP < 2.6) at the time of their last visit. Disease duration was longer in patients with SSc overlap syndrome compared to non-overlap patients (15.5 ± 10.6 yearsvs.9.5 ± 8, p < 0.001). Proportion of limited cutaneous SSc was similar in overlap and non-overlap groups (70.6%vs.75.5%, respectively, p = NS), as was the positivity for anti-centromeres antibodies (50%vs.43.2%, respectively, p = NS). The disease phenotype of SSc overlap syndrome was similar to the one of non-overlap SSc in terms of prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension, interstitial lung disease, digital ulcer and mortality. With respect to treatments, patients with overlap were more likely to receive glucocorticoids (85.3%vs.45%, p < 0.001), immunosuppressive drugs (82.4%vs.49.2%, p < 0.001) and biologic DMARD (bDMARD, 52.9 %vs.3.8%, p < 0.001). The most prescribed bDMARDs in the overlap population was tocilizumab (40.6%), TNF-alpha inhibitor (29.4%) and rituximab (26.5%) (p < 0.001 for all comparisonvs.non-overlap SSc).Conclusion:We found a prevalence of overlap syndrome higher than 5% among SSc patients. While SSc overlap and non-overlap share common characteristics, overlap patients are more likely to receive glucocorticoids and biologics such as anti-TNF. These overlap should be searched actively (eg, screening for ACPA) since some treatment used for other autoimmune diseases such as glucocorticoids or TNF-alpha inhibitor may be harmful in SSc.Disclosure of Interests:Marc SCHERLINGER Consultant of: Amgen, Mylan, Fresenius Kabi, Johanna Lutz: None declared, Jean Sibilia: None declared, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Consultant of: BMS, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Co., Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Christophe Richez Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB., Emmanuel Chatelus: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Lekich ◽  
Kurosh Parsi

Objectives Livedo racemosa is a reticulate eruption that presents with branched and partially blanchable incomplete rings. Livedo racemosa is distinct from livedo reticularis, a similar condition that presents with a diffuse and symmetrical blanchable eruption. In contrast to livedo reticularis which may be physiological, livedo racemosa is always associated with an underlying pathology. To our knowledge, this is the first report of panniculitis ossificans and heterotopic ossification of small saphenous vein (SSV) presenting with livedo racemosa. Methods We present a 70-year-old male referred for investigation and management of progressive pigmentation and ‘lipodermatosclerosis’ of lower limbs. There was no history of deep venous thrombosis but an earlier ultrasound had detected a non-occlusive thrombus in the left SSV. Examination and investigations revealed the skin eruption to be livedo racemosa and the associated subcutaneous induration and nodularity to be due to panniculitis ossificans. Biopsy of the SSV demonstrated segmental heterotopic ossification. Duplex ultrasound demonstrated bilateral superficial and deep venous incompetence but no evidence of an acute or chronic venous thrombosis. The patient was diagnosed with heterotopic ossification secondary to venous insufficiency and managed conservatively. Conclusion Livedo racemosa may be an early sign of panniculitis ossificans and its presence should trigger further diagnostic investigations.


Author(s):  
Meral EKİM ◽  
Hasan EKİM

Livedo reticularis (LR) is a hyperpigmented discoloration of the skin characterized by a violet, reticulated cyanotic pattern, and is more common on the extremities and trunk. LR is in the form of intact circular networks. If the circular reticulated appearance is distorted and shows an irregular fracture pattern, it is defined as livedo racemosa (LRC). LR is a benign, primary disease that affects young and middle-aged women. LRC, on the other hand, is a secondary disease, pathological and permanent. In LR, the vivid cone discoloration is symmetrical, reversible, and uniform. In LRC, the vivid cone discoloration is irreversible, and fractured. Although it has been stated as a concept that the pathological livedoid form is LCR, there is no clear distinction between LR and LRC in clinical studies and generally 'livedo reticularis' is used to describe both. Our study includes eight patients diagnosed with livedo reticularis between January 2013 and May 2021. One of our patients was male and the other was female. Their ages ranged from 25 to 70 years and the mean age was 45.5±16.7 years. Although the main complaints were coldness, numbness and pain, aesthetic anxiety was prominent in all patients. On physical examination, violet-colored fishing net-like appearances were noted on the lower extremities of all patients. It was accompanied by venous insufficiency in six of the patients. As a result of the treatment we applied, there was improvement in venous insufficiency. However, as a result of the vasodilator treatment we applied for cosmological purposes, there was no obvious improvement in the reticulated appearances. Because of the risk of developing neurovascular and cardiovascular complications several years after the onset of livedoid vasculopathy, it is important to monitor these patients. Considering that LR may be seen before pulmonary symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic period, necessary tests should be performed to rule out the diagnosis of COVID-19 in these cases.


1973 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Marion
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document