scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction after Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection for Cervical Radiculopathy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Hashemi ◽  
Payman Dadkhah ◽  
Mehrdad Taheri ◽  
Mahshid Ghasemi ◽  
Ali Hosseinpoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injection ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Epidural Steroid

Background: Cervical radiculopathy caused by disc herniation is a frequent public health issue with economical and socio-professional impacts. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction from cervical epidural steroid injection during a 2-year follow-up. Materials and Methods: Results based on patients’ reports from a previously performed intervention of cervical epidural steroid injection on patients with cervical radiculopathy due to cervical disc herniation are prospectively collected. Outcome measures are Neck Disability Index (NDI), numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain assessment, and 5-scale patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) plus opioid medication for pain relief, additional injections, and progression to surgery. Results: Of total 37 cases, 34 were available for follow-up after 2-year postoperatively. The mean preoperative NDI was 21.17 and improved to 17.38, and the mean NRS was 7.7 and improved to 5.00; both were statistically significant. Mean patient satisfaction after 2 years was 3.17 out of 5. 11 cases needed additional injections, and 4 of patients proceeded to surgery. Conclusion: We showed that transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injection for cervical radiculopathy is an effective non-surgical treatment option, providing significant pain relief and functional improvement during 2-years follow-up along with higher-than-average patient satisfaction in most of our patients. [GMJ.2019;8:e1478]

scholarly journals Concordant Pain Provocation During Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: Effect on Pain Outcome and Predictive Factors

2015 ◽  
Vol 18;1 (1;1) ◽  
pp. E19-E26
Author(s):  
Zack McCormick
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injection ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Pain Provocation ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
Epidural Steroid

Background: Anecdotal report suggests that provocation of pain during epidural steroid injection (ESI) that is concordant with typical radicular symptoms predicts pain outcome following injection. However, limited evidence exists that substantiates this theory. Additionally, there is a paucity of literature investigating factors associated with the provocation of pain during ESI. Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether provocation of concordant radicular pain during transforaminal ESI predicts pain relief immediately after injection and at short-term follow-up. Demographic, radiologic, and procedural factors associated with the pain provocation and pain outcomes at immediate and short-term follow-up were also investigated. Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Urban academic outpatient interventional spine clinics. Methods: Adults who underwent a fluoroscopically guided transforaminal ESI without sedation between January 1, 2006, and October 29, 2007, for the treatment of lumbosacral radicular pain were included in this study. The relationships between provocation of concordant pain, immediate post-injection, and follow-up visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, as well as with demographic, radiologic, and procedural factors were determined using chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests or ANOVA for numerical variables. Results: One thousand twenty one patients, 42.4% (433) male/57.6% (588) female, with a mean (SD) age of 54.1 (16.7) years were included in the study. Concordant pain provocation did not predict the magnitude of pain reduction (P = 0.9255) or the frequency of achieving > 50% pain relief (P = 0.7449) at short-term follow-up. Radiologic evidence of foraminal stenosis or nerve root impingement (P < 0.0001) and the lack of a medial-superior contrast flow pattern (P = 0.0199) were associated with a greater frequency of pain provocation during transforaminal ESI. Limitations: This study is primarily limited by possible selection bias given that patients who did not follow-up in the clinic could not be studied, and an incomplete follow-up rate (66%). Conclusions regarding subacute and long-term pain outcomes cannot be determined from this study as only short-term data were available. Conclusions: Provocation of concordant radicular pain does not predict pain relief at short-term follow-up after a transforaminal ESI. Foraminal stenosis, nerve root impingement, and lack of a medial-superior contrast flow pattern are associated with pain during the transforaminal ESI. Thus, clinicians should be aware of these radiologic and procedural risk factors for inciting pain during transforaminal ESI. Key words: Epidural steroid injection, lumbar, radicular pain, outcomes, prognostic

Effect of Depression on Patient Reported Outcomes following Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection for Degenerative Spine Disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S289-S290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott Kim ◽  
Silky Chotai ◽  
Byron J. Schneider ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Matthew J. McGirt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injection ◽  
Degenerative Spine ◽  
Degenerative Spine Disease ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Epidural Steroid ◽  
Spine Disease

P55. Do patients accurately recall symptoms pre and post lumbar epidural steroid injection: A cohort study of recall bias in patient reported outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S166-S167
Author(s):  
Bilal B. Butt ◽  
David Kagan ◽  
Joel Gagnier ◽  
Rakesh (Rock) D. Patel ◽  
Ronald Wasserman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injection ◽  
Recall Bias ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Epidural Steroid

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad M. Khalifeh ◽  
Christopher F. Dibble ◽  
Ammar H. Hawasli ◽  
Wilson Z. Ray
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Perceived Health Status ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is an adaptive, self-reported outcomes assessment tool that utilizes item response theory and computer adaptive testing to efficiently and precisely evaluate symptoms and perceived health status. Efforts to implement and report PROMIS outcomes in spine clinical practice remain limited. The objective of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the performance and psychometric properties of PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) among patients undergoing spine surgery.METHODSThe authors identified all patients who underwent spine surgery at their institution between 2016 and 2018, and for whom there was retrievable PROMIS data. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize demographics, operative characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes. Assessments were evaluated preoperatively, and postoperatively within 2 months (early), 6 months (intermediate), and up to 2 years (late). Pairwise change scores were calculated to evaluate within-subjects differences and construct responsiveness over time. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between PROMIS PF and PI domains. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the primary diagnoses of cervical radiculopathy, cervical myelopathy, or lumbar degenerative disease.RESULTSA total of 2770 patients (1395 males, 50.4%) were included in the analysis. The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.3 ± 14.4 years. Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 7.6 ± 6.2 months. Preoperatively, patients scored an average 15.1 ± 7.4 points below the normative population (mean 50 ± 10 points) in PF, and 15.8 ± 6.8 points above the mean in PI. PROMIS PF required a mean of 4.1 ± 0.6 questions and median 40 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 29–58 seconds) to be completed, which was similar to PI (median 4.3 ± 1.1 questions and 38 seconds [IQR 27–59 seconds]). Patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in PF and PI, which were sustained throughout the postoperative course. PROMIS instruments were able to capture anticipated changes in PF and PI, although to a lesser degree in PF early postoperatively. There was a strong negative correlation between PROMIS PF and PI scores at baseline (Pearson’s r = −0.72) and during follow-up appointments (early, intermediate, and late |r| > 0.6, each). Subgroup analysis demonstrated similar results within diagnostic groups compared to the overall cohort. However, the burden of PF limitations and PI was greater within the lumbar spine disease subgroup, compared to patients with cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy.CONCLUSIONSPatients receiving care at a tertiary spine surgery outpatient clinic experience significant overall disability and PI, as measured by PROMIS PF and PI computer adaptive tests. PROMIS PF and PI health domains are strongly correlated, responsive to changes over time, and facilitate time-efficient evaluations of perceived health status outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery.

scholarly journals Effect of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection for Degenerative Spine Disease

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2371-2376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott J Kim ◽  
Silky Chotai ◽  
Byron J Schneider ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Matthew J McGirt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injection ◽  
Degenerative Spine ◽  
Degenerative Spine Disease ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Epidural Steroid ◽  
Spine Disease

No Difference in Outcomes Following Osteochondral Allograft with Fresh Precut Cores Compared to Hemi-Condylar Allografts

Cartilage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 194760352110219
Author(s):  
Danielle H. Markus ◽  
Anna M. Blaeser ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Brian J. Mannino ◽  
Kirk A. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Objective The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes at early to midterm follow-up between fresh precut cores versus hemi-condylar osteochondral allograft (OCAs) in the treatment of symptomatic osteochondral lesions. Design A retrospective review of patients who underwent an OCA was performed. Patient matching between those with OCA harvested from an allograft condyle/patella or a fresh precut allograft core was performed to generate 2 comparable groups. The cartilage at the graft site was assessed with use of a modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Results Overall, 52 total patients who underwent OCA with either fresh precut OCA cores ( n = 26) and hemi-condylar OCA ( n = 26) were pair matched at a mean follow-up of 34.0 months (range 12 months to 99 months). The mean ages were 31.5 ± 10.7 for fresh precut cores and 30.9 ± 9.8 for hemi-condylar ( P = 0.673). Males accounted for 36.4% of the overall cohort, and the mean lesion size for fresh precut OCA core was 19.6 mm2 compared to 21.2 mm2 for whole condyle ( P = 0.178). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes including Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and Tegner ( P > 0.5 for each), or in MOCART score (69.2 vs. 68.3, P = 0.93). Conclusions This study found that there was no difference in patient-reported clinical outcomes or MOCART scores following OCA implantation using fresh precut OCA cores or size matched condylar grafts at early to midterm follow-up.

EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN.

2021 ◽  
pp. 52-54
Author(s):  
Ravi Ranjan Singh ◽  
Bharat Singh
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injection ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Herniated Lumbar Disc ◽  
Epidural Steroid

INTRODUCTION: Low-back pain is a common clinical presentation of herniated lumbar disc. The incidence of low back pain is high in our country due to difcult working and living environment. The initial treatment of low back pain is conservative. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is being slowly established as a simple, effective and minimally invasive treatment modality. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of epidural steroid injection for low back and radicular pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS :This is a Prospective observational study. It was carried out on the patients presenting with low back pain due to herniated lumbar disc not responding to conservational management and had Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) proven lumbar disc prolapsed at different level. Injection Methyl prednisolone 80 mg and 2 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was diluted in 8 ml of normal saline and injected into the affected lumbar epidural space. The functional status of the patient and the severity of pain were evaluated before injection and after injection during the follow-up period by using Ostrewy disability index and visual analogue score. RESULTS: Fifty six patients received the epidural steroid injections, among them three patients did not came for regular follow up till six months and six patients required surgery . remaining forty seven were analyzed , among them 27(55.44%) were male and 20(42.55%) were female. The functional status and pain response of the patients were improved signicantly during all the follow-up periods (p < 0.001). The success rate of this study was 83.92%. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION:The ESI is a simple, safe, effective and minimally invasive modality for the management of lumbar radicular pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document