scholarly journals Letter to the Editor. Cost-effectiveness of sodium fluorescein in high-grade gliomas

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (5) ◽  
pp. 1626-1627
Author(s):  
Oriela Rustemi ◽  
Fabio Raneri ◽  
Giacomo Beggio ◽  
Lorenzo Volpin
Radiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 291 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Abraham ◽  
Reith Sarkar ◽  
Michael G. Brandel ◽  
Arvin R. Wali ◽  
Robert C. Rennert ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. E20
Author(s):  
Kyle A. Smith ◽  
Michael Salacz ◽  
Paul J. Camarata

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (5) ◽  
pp. 1324-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus W. Hansen ◽  
Christian B. Pedersen ◽  
Bo Halle ◽  
Anders R. Korshoej ◽  
Mette K. Schulz ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEMaximal safe resection is an important surgical goal in the treatment for high-grade gliomas. Fluorescent dyes help the surgeon to distinguish malignant tissue from healthy. The aims of this study were 1) to compare the 2 fluorescent dyes 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and sodium fluorescein (fluorescein) regarding extent of resection, progression-free survival, and overall survival; and 2) to assess the influence of other risk factors on clinical outcome and screen for potential disadvantages of the dyes.METHODSA total of 209 patients with high-grade gliomas were included in this retrospective study. Resections were performed in the period from 2012 to 2017 using 5-ALA or fluorescein. Extent of resection was assessed as the difference in tumor volume between early postoperative and preoperative MRI studies. Tumor progression–free survival and overall survival were analyzed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.RESULTSOne hundred fifty-eight patients were operated on with 5-ALA and 51 with fluorescein. The median duration of follow-up was 46.7 and 21.2 months, respectively. Covariables were evenly distributed. There was no statistically significant difference in volumetrically assessed median extent of resection (96.9% for 5-ALA vs 97.4% for fluorescein, p = 0.46) or the percentage of patients with residual tumor volume less than 0.175 cm3 (29.5% for 5-ALA vs 36.2% for fluorescein, p = 0.39). The median overall survival was 14.8 months for the 5-ALA group and 19.7 months for the fluorescein group (p = 0.06). The median adjusted progression-free survival was 8.7 months for the 5-ALA group and 9.2 months for the fluorescein group (p = 0.03).CONCLUSIONSFluorescein can be used as a viable alternative to 5-ALA for intraoperative fluorescent guidance in brain tumor surgery. Comparative, prospective, and randomized studies are much needed.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Esteves ◽  
Marta Alves ◽  
Marta Castel-Branco ◽  
Walter Stummer

Abstract BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas are aggressive, incurable tumors characterized by extensive diffuse invasion of the normal brain parenchyma. Novel therapies at best prolong survival; their costs are formidable and benefit is marginal. Economic restrictions thus require knowledge of the cost-effectiveness of treatments. Here, we show the cost-effectiveness of enhanced resections in malignant glioma surgery using a well-characterized tool for intraoperative tumor visualization, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 5-ALA fluorescence-guided neurosurgery compared with white-light surgery in adult patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma, adopting the perspective of the Portuguese National Health Service. METHODS: We used a Markov model (cohort simulation). Transition probabilities were estimated with the use of data from 1 randomized clinical trial and 1 noninterventional prospective study. Utility values and resource use were obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Unit costs were taken from official Portuguese reimbursement lists (2012 values). The health outcomes considered were quality-adjusted life-years, life-years, and progression-free life-years. Extensive 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are below &OV0556;10 000 in all evaluated outcomes, being around &OV0556;9100 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, &OV0556;6700 per life-year gained, and &OV0556;8800 per progression-free life-year gained. The probability of 5-ALA fluorescence-guided surgery cost-effectiveness at a threshold of &OV0556;20000 is 96.0% for quality-adjusted life-year, 99.6% for life-year, and 98.8% for progression-free life-year. CONCLUSION: 5-ALA fluorescence-guided surgery appears to be cost-effective in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas compared with white-light surgery. This example demonstrates cost-effectiveness analyses for malignant glioma surgery to be feasible on the basis of existing data.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi146-vi146
Author(s):  
Peter Abraham ◽  
Reith Sarkar ◽  
Michael Brandel ◽  
Arvin Wali ◽  
Robert Rennert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document