scholarly journals Dural Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (244) ◽  
pp. 1316-1319
Author(s):  
Dhiraj Chaurasia ◽  
Bikash Yadav ◽  
Krishna Dhungana

Dural Venous Sinus Thrombosis is the formation of blood clot within the cerebral sinus. It is very rare case with varying clinical presentation. It has non-specific signs and symptoms ranging from headache, papilledema, seizures, focal neurological deficits and mental state changes which is caused by genetic and acquired prothrombotic states, infections, inflammatory disease and trauma. Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Magnetic Resonance Venography is the specific imaging technique for the diagnosis. We have described a case of a patient who presented with headache over the temporal and occipital region and was disoriented. The Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Venography report revealed presence of thrombus in the transverse and sigmoid sinus with hemorrhagic infarcts. He was then treated with anticoagulants Low Molecular Weight Heparin which was further substituted by Warfarin.

2017 ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Mariusz Wachowski

Tło. Zakrzepica zatok żylnych (dural venous sinus thrombosis – DVST) stanowi istotny i trudny problem diagnostyczny ze względu na mało specyfi czny obraz kliniczny oraz zróżnicowaną dynamikę objawów. Celem niniejszego opisu przypadku jest uzasadnieniemożliwości wykorzystania sekwencji zależnej od podatności magnetycznej (susceptibility-weighted imaging – SWI) w skutecznym rozpoznawaniu DVST oraz w różnicowaniu jej potencjalnych powikłań. Opis przypadku. 38-letnia pacjentka została przyjęta do kliniki neurologii z powodu silnego bólu głowy z następczą utratą przytomności. Przy przyjęciu wykonano przeglądową tomografi ę komputerową (TK) głowy. Uzyskane obrazy oceniono jako prawidłowe. W 6. dobie hospitalizacji ze względu na nagłe pogorszenie stanu klinicznego oraz podwyższone wartości D-dimerów przeprowadzono jednofazowe badanie metodą rezonansu magnetycznego (magnetic resonance imaging – MRI). Stwierdzono poszerzenie zatoki strzałkowej górnej oraz obecność skrzepliny na odcinku około 55 mm. Ponadto w sekwencji FLAIR oraz T2-zależnej stwierdzonoobszary patologiczne w zakręcie zaśrodkowym. W związku z podejrzeniem wystąpienia zawału żylnego przeprowadzono sekwencję SWI, co pozwoliło na jego wykluczenie. Ustalono rozpoznanie przekrwienia żylnego. Wnioski. Analiza obrazu w sekwencji SWI pozwoliła na jednoznaczne wykluczenie udaru krwotocznego i umożliwiła kontynuowanie terapii przeciwzakrzepowej.


Author(s):  
Ji Y. Chong ◽  
Michael P. Lerario

Headache and hemorrhagic infarcts in patients who are hypercoagulable (including pregnancy and puerperium) should prompt an evaluation for dural venous sinus thrombosis. Intracranial venous thrombosis is a rare cause of stroke. Diagnosis is made with venous imaging such as magnetic resonance venography. Investigation for underlying prothrombotic state is needed. Treatment is typically with anticoagulation, despite hemorrhage on imaging.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Hartel ◽  
Ewa Kluczewska ◽  
Eliza Gancarczyk-Urlik ◽  
Krystyna Pierzchała ◽  
Karolina Bień ◽  
...  

Diagnostic imaging in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis poses difficulties due to the relatively rare incidence of this pathology and its usually inconclusive clinical and radiological symptoms. The preliminary examination is usually performed using computed tomography, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides better visualisation of the lesion. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging angiography enable the characterisation of the blood flow in the pathologically affected vessels in more detail. Familiarity with the anatomic variations of the venous system and with the advantages and limitations of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging enables faster diagnosis of the pathology. This is significant for treatment, which, in many cases, can be efficient only if introduced at a sufficiently early stage.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 730-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangwen Li ◽  
Xianwei Zeng ◽  
Mohammed Hussain ◽  
Ran Meng ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although the majority of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) obtain an optimistic clinical outcome after heparin or warfarin treatment, there remains a subgroup of patients who do not respond to conventional anticoagulation treatment. These patients, especially younger people, as documented by hospital-based studies, have a high morbidity and mortality rate. OBJECTIVE: To verify the safety and efficacy of a dual mechanical thrombectomy with thrombolysis treatment modality option in patients with severe CVST. METHODS: Fifty-two patients diagnosed with CVST were enrolled and treated with mechanical thrombectomy combined with thrombolysis. Patients underwent urokinase 100 to 1500 × 103 IU intravenous sinus injection via a jugular catheter after confirming diagnoses of CVST by using either magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance venography or digital subtract angiography. Information obtained on the patients included recanalization status of venous sinuses as evaluated by magnetic resonance venography or digital subtract angiography at admission, during operation, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up after treatment. RESULTS: The percentage of patients that showed complete and partial recanalization were 87% and 6%, respectively, after mechanical thrombectomy combined with thrombolysis treatment; 8% of the patients showed no recanalization. The modified Rankin Scale scores were 1.0 ± 0.9, 0.85 ± 0.63, and 0.37 ± 0.53 for discharge, and 3- and 6-month follow-up, respectively. A total of 6 patients died despite receiving aggressive treatment. No cases of relapse occurred after 3 to 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Thrombectomy combined with thrombolysis is a safe and valid treatment modality to use in severe CVST cases or in intractable patients that have shown no adequate response to antithrombotic drugs.


Angiology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Pradhan ◽  
Ramakant Yadav ◽  
Himanshu Diwakar ◽  
Rajendra V. Phadke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document