A Multifaceted Approach to Semantic, Statistical, and Psycholinguistic Analysis of Lexical Polysemy

2019 ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
V. Apresjan ◽  
◽  
Yu. Apresyan ◽  
O. Dragoy ◽  
B. Yomdin ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
ROBERT FINN

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn R. Oka ◽  
Amanda Hall ◽  
Ruth Del Salto ◽  
Todd R. Stevens ◽  
Laura Benson

Planta Medica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
DA Colosimo ◽  
F Cai ◽  
Y Hu ◽  
MB Potts ◽  
MA White ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaud Soucy La Roche ◽  
◽  
Laurent Godin ◽  
Laurent Godin ◽  
John M. Cottle ◽  
...  

Flora ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 256 ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Ottaviani ◽  
Lars Götzenberger ◽  
Giovanni Bacaro ◽  
Alessandro Chiarucci ◽  
Francesco de Bello ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Moska Sial ◽  
Manavi Purohit ◽  
Matan Bone

Abstract The coronavirus 2019 (SARS-Cov-2) pandemic has proven to be a disaster in need of controlling. The disease has taken its toll on universities; as a consequence, universities must prepare their campuses in such a way that will reduce SARS-Cov-2 cases and ensure the safety of their students. This is why it is necessary to critically assess the risks involved in reopening university campuses. This letter to the editor highlights the importance of the social side of student life on campus, and how it might affect the precautions put in place to reduce SARS-Cov-2 transmission. Furthermore, this letter is proposing potential courses of action for universities to take during the pandemic, this forthcoming academic year. The ability of universities to contain the spread of the virus is limited, as they lack control over social interactions outside of campus. We discuss the multifaceted approach needed to educate students about off-campus transmission allowing the prevention of SARS-Cov-2 transmission.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s162-s162
Author(s):  
Jane Adams ◽  
Thomas File ◽  
Matthew England ◽  
Nancy Reynolds ◽  
Patricia Wells ◽  
...  

Background: Inappropriate ordering of urine cultures and the resulting unnecessary use of antibiotics can lead to complications of antimicrobial therapy including resistance, adverse effects (eg, disruption of microbiome and C. difficile infection), and increased healthcare costs, as well as the erroneous determination of CAUTI in patients with Foley catheters. A retrospective analysis of patients with CAUTI revealed frequent ordering of urine cultures for conditions and symptoms not supported by current IDSA guidelines. As a result, we created an action plan to reverse the trend of inappropriate urine culture ordering. Methods: Our urine culture reduction campaign was developed with input from the infectious disease service, antibiotic stewardship team (AST), infection prevention, pharmacy, and the microbiology service. The following educational efforts were included: (1) distribution of outpatient pocket cards with communication to providers about appropriate ordering of urine cultures; (2) creation of an evidence-based order set for urinalysis and urine cultures distributed electronically as emails and screensavers on computer stations and in person via didactic sessions with physicians and nursing staff; (3) a practice pointer for staff nurses that included recommended changes to urine culture ordering and encouraged open dialogue with physicians regarding the appropriateness of urine cultures; (4) didactic and personal communications to counter long-standing myths, such as “Urine cultures always for change in mental status”; (5) a peer-review process to evaluate and justify deviations from the testing algorithm.Results: The first and second months after the introduction of the campaign, the microbiology laboratory reported 23% and 37% reductions in urine cultures ordered, respectively. During the same period, a 48% reduction in CAUTIs was reported for the entire health system. Conclusions: Reducing the number of inappropriate urine cultures is achievable with intense communication utilizing a multifaceted approach. With continued educational activities, we expect to sustain and even improve our successful reduction of inappropriate urine culture orders, ultimately improving patient outcomes.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110014
Author(s):  
Nicola Henry ◽  
Stefani Vasil ◽  
Asher Flynn ◽  
Karen Kellard ◽  
Colette Mortreux

Digital technologies are increasingly being used as tools for the perpetration of domestic violence. Little empirical research to date has explored the nature and impacts of technology-facilitated domestic violence (TFDV), and even less attention has been paid to the experiences of immigrant and refugee women. This article examines the nature and impacts of TFDV as experienced by immigrant and refugee women. Drawing on interviews with 29 victim-survivors and 20 stakeholders, we argue that although immigrant and refugee women may experience TFDV in similar ways to non-immigrant and refugee women, they face unique challenges, such as language barriers, cultural bias from support services, lack of financial resources, lack of trust in state institutions, and additional challenges with justice and migration systems. Immigrant and refugee women also face multiple structural layers of oppression and social inequality. Accordingly, we argue that a multifaceted approach is required to address TFDV that includes culturally sensitive and specific law reform, education, and training.


1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Hughes ◽  
Steven W. Graham ◽  
Michael W. Galbraith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document