scholarly journals Host range and forma specialis of cocksfoot powdery mildew fungus (Erysiphe graminis DC.) found in Japan.

1985 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi OKU ◽  
Shuichi YAMASHITA ◽  
Yoji DOI ◽  
Natsuki NISHIHARA
Genome ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tosa ◽  
K. Sakai

The avirulence of Erysiphe graminis f.sp. agropyri, Ak-1, on Triticum aestivum 'Norin 4' and 'Norin 10' and T. compactum 'No.44' is conditioned by four genes; three operate singly against each cultivar and one operates against all three cultivars. If the forma specialis – genus specificity follows the gene-for-gene relationship, four major genes should be involved in the resistance of the three cultivars to Ak-1, one carried only by 'Norin 4', one carried only by 'No.44', one carried only by 'Norin 10', and one carried by all three cultivars. The first and second genes were considered to be the previously reported genes Pm10 and Pm11, respectively. The third and fourth genes were successfully detected using F1 hybrid cultures between Ak-1 and E. graminis f.sp. tritici, Tk-1. They were located on chromosomes 6B and 7D and designated Pm14 and Pm15, respectively. These results strongly support the assumption that the forma specialis – genus specificity follows the gene-for-gene relationship. It is, therefore, concluded that this type of specificity belongs to cultivar specificity rather than plant-species specificity and that the resistance to inappropriate formae speciales is essentially cultivar resistance and not nonhost resistance.Key words: powdery mildew, Erysiphe graminis, wheat, wheatgrass, resistance.


1995 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Schweizer ◽  
Laurence Vallélian-Bindschedler ◽  
Egon Mösinger

1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 2114-2117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tosa ◽  
J. Shishiyama

Cellular defense reactions in five barley cultivars against Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici were examined in the course of primary and secondary penetrations. In cv. Kairyobozu-mugi, 35% of infection attempts were stopped at fluorescent papillae, and the others (65%) induced fluorescing of epidermal cells, resulting in the failure of the formation of primary haustoria. In the other cultivars ('H.E.S.4', 'Russian No. 12', 'Goseshikoku', and 'Turkey 290') the penetration failures associated with fluorescent papillae reached 50–75%, but the infection attempts that induced the fluorescing of epidermal cells were fewer than 20%. Consequently 10–30% of the germlings that attempted penetration successfully formed normal primary haustoria 48 h after inoculation. In cv. Goseshikoku, cv. Russian No. 12, and cv. H.E.S.4, 50–75% of the epidermal cells that contained the primary haustoria were fluorescent 7 days after inoculation, and colony growth was severely restricted. In cv. Turkey 290 such fluorescent cells scarcely occurred and colonies developed comparatively well. On this cultivar conidia were produced 5–6 days after inoculation, but only in small quantities. This restriction of colony development was mainly attributable to the inhibition of the formation of secondary haustoria by fluorescent papillae. These results indicate that there are differences among barley cultivars in cellular defense reactions against the wheat powdery mildew fungus and suggest that the formation of papillae during the course of primary penetration is not necessarily an essential factor in the resistance of barley to this inappropriate forma specialis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document