Smoothing the High Seas. A Deleuzoguattarian Analysis of the Somali Pirates

Author(s):  
Peter Heft
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica F. Green ◽  
Bryce Rudyk
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
JULIO PEÑA-TORRES ◽  
RODOLFO SERRA ◽  
MICHAEL BASCH
Keyword(s):  

Marine Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 104377
Author(s):  
Daniel Wagner ◽  
Liesbeth van der Meer ◽  
Matthias Gorny ◽  
Javier Sellanes ◽  
Carlos F. Gaymer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. eabe3470
Author(s):  
Jorge P. Rodríguez ◽  
Juan Fernández-Gracia ◽  
Carlos M. Duarte ◽  
Xabier Irigoien ◽  
Víctor M. Eguíluz

Fisheries in waters beyond national jurisdiction (“high seas”) are difficult to monitor and manage. Their regulation for sustainability requires critical information on how fishing effort is distributed across fishing and landing areas, including possible border effects at the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) limits. We infer the global network linking harbors supporting fishing vessels to fishing areas in high seas from automatic identification system tracking data in 2014, observing a modular structure, with vessels departing from a given harbor fishing mostly in a single province. The top 16% of these harbors support 84% of fishing effort in high seas, with harbors in low- and middle-income countries ranked among the top supporters. Fishing effort concentrates along narrow strips attached to the boundaries of EEZs with productive fisheries, identifying a free-riding behavior that jeopardizes efforts by nations to sustainably manage their fisheries, perpetuating the tragedy of the commons affecting global fishery resources.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Festus O Ukwueze ◽  
Herbert A Umezuruike ◽  
Dike J Ibegbulem

Abstract This article critically examines the admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal High Court of Nigeria in relation to claims arising from combined transport shipping. It questions the rationale for the continued circumscription of the court's admiralty jurisdiction to activities on navigable waters based on English law pedigree. It argues that, in the present era of containerization and combined transport shipping, it has become imperative to unshackle Nigerian courts from English antecedents that limit the admiralty jurisdiction of the court to activities on the high seas. The article identifies extant national legislation, a continental instrument and recent judicial authorities that provide the basis for expanding the Federal High Court's admiralty jurisdiction to accommodate the adjudication of claims derived from combined transport shipping beyond the locale of the high seas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document