Mapping the Proxies of Memory and Learning Function in Senior Adults with High-performing, Normal Aging and Neurocognitive Disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 815-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Lu ◽  
Xi Ni ◽  
Ada W.T. Fung ◽  
Linda C.W. Lam
1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 761-762
Author(s):  
T.B. Danforth ◽  
D.A. Gansler ◽  
R.A. McMackin

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Woo Jeong ◽  
Kwang Taek Kim ◽  
Jin Gyu Oh ◽  
Kyung Jin Chung ◽  
Tae Beom Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Arkady Uryash ◽  
Valentina Flores ◽  
Jose A. Adams ◽  
Paul D. Allen ◽  
Jose R. Lopez

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar Heubrock

Performance on a German version of the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) was investigated for 64 juvenile patients who were subdivided in 6 clinical groups. In addition to standard evaluation of AVLT protocols which is usually confined to items recalled correctly, an error analysis was performed. Differentiating between total errors (TE), repetition errors (RE), and misnamings (ME), substantial differences between clinical groups could be demonstrated. It is argued that error analysis of verbal memory and learning enriches the understanding of neuropsychological syndromes, and provides additional information for diagnostic and clinical use. Thus, it is possible to gain a more accurate picture so that patients can be appropriately retrained, and research into the functional causes of memory and learning disorders can be intensified.


Author(s):  
Bettina von Helversen ◽  
Stefan M. Herzog ◽  
Jörg Rieskamp

Judging other people is a common and important task. Every day professionals make decisions that affect the lives of other people when they diagnose medical conditions, grant parole, or hire new employees. To prevent discrimination, professional standards require that decision makers render accurate and unbiased judgments solely based on relevant information. Facial similarity to previously encountered persons can be a potential source of bias. Psychological research suggests that people only rely on similarity-based judgment strategies if the provided information does not allow them to make accurate rule-based judgments. Our study shows, however, that facial similarity to previously encountered persons influences judgment even in situations in which relevant information is available for making accurate rule-based judgments and where similarity is irrelevant for the task and relying on similarity is detrimental. In two experiments in an employment context we show that applicants who looked similar to high-performing former employees were judged as more suitable than applicants who looked similar to low-performing former employees. This similarity effect was found despite the fact that the participants used the relevant résumé information about the applicants by following a rule-based judgment strategy. These findings suggest that similarity-based and rule-based processes simultaneously underlie human judgment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document