Norms for Testing Visual Binding Using the Memory Associative Test (TMA-93) in Older Educationally-Diverse Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 871-878
Author(s):  
Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero ◽  
Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides ◽  
Leire Ainz-Gómez ◽  
Andrea Luque-Tirado ◽  
Eugenia Graciani-Cantisán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1591) ◽  
pp. 954-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kubovy ◽  
Minhong Yu

We present a sceptical view of multimodal multistability—drawing most of our examples from the relation between audition and vision. We begin by summarizing some of the principal ways in which audio-visual binding takes place. We review the evidence that unambiguous stimulation in one modality may affect the perception of a multistable stimulus in another modality. Cross-modal influences of one multistable stimulus on the multistability of another are different: they have occurred only in speech perception. We then argue that the strongest relation between perceptual organization in vision and perceptual organization in audition is likely to be by way of analogous Gestalt laws. We conclude with some general observations about multimodality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Michael Paul Wilbiks

When making decisions as to whether or not to bind auditory and visual information, temporal, spatial and congruency factors all contribute to the acceptance or rejection of multi-modal unity. While many of these factors have been studied in isolation, it is important to examine how they interact in a dynamic setting, in addition to evaluating ideas about the intrinsic relation between audition and the processing of time, and vision and the processing of space. Four experiments are presented, placing auditory and visual stimuli in a competitive binding scenario, to compare the effects of temporal and spatial factors both within and between modalities. Results support the dominance of auditory factors in temporal decision-making, and visual factors in spatial decision-making, with additional evidence for the presence of visual looming. With respect to audio-visual binding, the findings indicate precedence for temporal factors, with reliance on congruency factors only when the stimulus pairings are temporally ambiguous.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
R. Blake ◽  
T. Palmeri ◽  
R. Marois ◽  
W. Whetsell
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon D. Northcutt ◽  
Charles M. Higgins

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1475-1481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin N. Wood

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document