scholarly journals Theta burst stimulation to characterize changes in brain plasticity following mild traumatic brain injury: A proof-of-principle study

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 611-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Tremblay ◽  
Marine Vernet ◽  
Shahid Bashir ◽  
Alvaro Pascual-Leone ◽  
Hugo Théoret
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 3048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feldmann ◽  
Le Prieult ◽  
Felzen ◽  
Thal ◽  
Engelhard ◽  
...  

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to impaired cognition and memory consolidation.The acute phase (24–48 h) after TBI is often characterized by neural dysfunction in the vicinity ofthe lesion, but also in remote areas like the contralateral hemisphere. Protein homeostasis is crucialfor synaptic long-term plasticity including the protein degradation systems, proteasome andautophagy. Still, little is known about the acute effects of TBI on synaptic long-term plasticity andprotein degradation. Thus, we investigated TBI in a controlled cortical impact (CCI) model in themotor and somatosensory cortex of mice ex vivo-in vitro. Late long-term potentiation (l-LTP) wasinduced by theta-burst stimulation in acute brain slices after survival times of 1–2 days. Proteinlevels for the plasticity related protein calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)was quantified by Western blots, and the protein degradation activity by enzymatical assays. Weobserved missing maintenance of l-LTP in the ipsilateral hemisphere, however not in thecontralateral hemisphere after TBI. Protein levels of CaMKII were not changed but, interestingly,the protein degradation revealed bidirectional changes with a reduced proteasome activity and anincreased autophagic flux in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Finally, LTP recordings in the presence ofpharmacologically modified protein degradation systems also led to an impaired synaptic plasticity:bath-applied MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, or rapamycin, an activator of autophagy, bothadministered during theta burst stimulation, blocked the induction of LTP. These data indicate thatalterations in protein degradation pathways likely contribute to cognitive deficits in the acute phaseafter TBI, which could be interesting for future approaches towards neuroprotective treatmentsearly after traumatic brain injury.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 2053-2056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Bonnì ◽  
Chiara Mastropasqua ◽  
Marco Bozzali ◽  
Carlo Caltagirone ◽  
Giacomo Koch

Hippocampus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1592-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Sweet ◽  
Katharine C. Eakin ◽  
Charles N. Munyon ◽  
Jonathan P. Miller

2013 ◽  
Vol 553 ◽  
pp. 148-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Di Lazzaro ◽  
John C. Rothwell ◽  
Penelope Talelli ◽  
Fioravante Capone ◽  
Federico Ranieri ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Jonathan Miller ◽  
Charles Nelson Munyon ◽  
Philip Fastenau ◽  
Christopher Bailey ◽  
Jennifer A. Sweet

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede ◽  
Catarina Freitas ◽  
Jennifer R. Cromer ◽  
Laura Safar ◽  
Dost Ongur ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Katy O'Brien ◽  
Kelly Knollman-Porter ◽  
Tracey Wallace

Purpose The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released guidelines for rehabilitation professionals regarding the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Given that mTBI impacts millions of children each year and can be particularly detrimental to children in middle and high school age groups, access to universal recommendations for management of postinjury symptoms is ideal. Method This viewpoint article examines the CDC guidelines and applies these recommendations directly to speech-language pathology practices. In particular, education, assessment, treatment, team management, and ongoing monitoring are discussed. In addition, suggested timelines regarding implementation of services by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are provided. Specific focus is placed on adolescents (i.e., middle and high school–age children). Results SLPs are critical members of the rehabilitation team working with children with mTBI and should be involved in education, symptom monitoring, and assessment early in the recovery process. SLPs can also provide unique insight into the cognitive and linguistic challenges of these students and can serve to bridge the gap among rehabilitation and school-based professionals, the adolescent with brain injury, and their parents. Conclusion The guidelines provided by the CDC, along with evidence from the field of speech pathology, can guide SLPs to advocate for involvement in the care of adolescents with mTBI. More research is needed to enhance the evidence base for direct assessment and treatment with this population; however, SLPs can use their extensive knowledge and experience working with individuals with traumatic brain injury as a starting point for post-mTBI care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document